Posted on 03/30/2013 8:06:10 PM PDT by wesagain
Many cases challenging Barack Obama’s presidential eligibility have come and gone, but now an appeal has been filed with a state Supreme Court led by a newly elected chief justice who has expressed doubt about Obama’s qualification for office.
Roy Moore was elected chief justice of the Alabama Supreme Court last November, a decade after he defied a federal order to remove a Ten Commandments monument from the state Supreme Court building.
Now, 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish are asking the state’s highest court to force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.
Get Judge Roy Moore’s classic book about his battle for liberty, “So Help Me God: The Ten Commandments, Judicial Tyranny, and the Battle for Religious Freedom.”
Attorney Larry Klayman, founder of the Washington, D.C.-watch dog Judicial Watch and now head of Freedom Watch, filed the appeal Tuesday with the Alabama Supreme Court, asking for oral arguments.
“We are hopeful that Chief Justice Moore and the rest of the jurists on the Alabama Supreme Court will follow the law,” Klayman told WND.
Klayman says he and his team “have great respect for Chief Justice Moore and his integrity and legal acumen.”
“He is one courageous and brave man. There are few in this country.”
The case is an appeal of a dismissal by the Montgomery Circuit Court.
In his brief, Klayman says “credible evidence and information from an official source” was presented to Chapman before the election indicating Obama might not have been qualified for Oval Office.
The complaint argues Chapman failed her constitutional duty as secretary of state to verify the eligibility .........
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
dead when it gets above is court.
Each and every one of the most powerful people on the planet. government, civilian and military know Obama is not eligible. Thus complicit to one degree or another. Many of them legally so.
The problem is self evident.
The correct answer is “Everything”. Because no one will defy the MSM. Khrushchev was an idiot. He spent billions on nukes when all he needed was an accusation of racism and bigotry to destroy America. Because of 300million people, 299 million of us are cowards more worried about how others see us than ANYTHING.
push at those that were supposed to verify... demand their evidence and results. re-verify and demand to know why they didn’t do their job.
then file charges and put them in jail
Another one that will not work Get used to it 0 will be forever! And a Nation under seige for the next 20 years!
The entitled will make sure of that!
This is an appeal of a dismissal of a case against the Alabama Secretary of State. The suit asks for an order that the SoS not list Obama on the November 2012 ballot. Since the election is over and Obama didn’t win any electoral votes in Alabama, the case is now moot.
Cowards all. Ouch! Tis true though.
Moot perhaps but no matter. If the evidence is entered by a court, it provides cause to bring others to justice.
It also allows the House or Senate or both to appoint a special prosecutor. So it becomes an issue for the 2014 midterm elections.
A special prosecutor can also use the evidence entered in Alabama to investigate the Hawaii department of vital records of which Onaka is already implicated in fraud.
What happens in Alabama can allow all of Sheriff Arpaio’s investigational evidence to be brought into focus.
Alabama can be a stepping stone that brings Obama down.
Is Klayman trying to win this?? The key is citing the Supreme Court in Luria V. United States for showing that Minor and not Wong Kim Ark was recognized by the Supreme Court as precedent on Article II eligibility. Next, they need to cite Fairchild v. Hughes to make sure they overcome the standing hurdle as this case guarantees all citizens the right to a government that is run in accordance to law. IOW, standing is not required when ineligible candidates are involved.
In Alabama, there is no “above is court.” They are challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on Alabama’s ballot. If ruled ineligible, then another can o’ worms is opened. However, the electoral college has already voted and the vote was certified in the Congress. So, imo, this would have no effect on the current situation.
“JUSTIA.COM SURGICALLY REMOVED “MINOR v HAPPERSETT” FROM 25 SUPREME COURT OPINIONS IN RUN UP TO ’08 ELECTION.”
snip-”every American should be outraged that 25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the “Full Text of Case”.”
If the case gets to a court, then you can often win even if you lose the case. In this situation, you want to have your evidence of Obama’s ineligibility to run for President be made part of the official and openly accessible record.
You are aiming for the “court of public opinion” as much as you are aiming for the judges to side with your presentation.
I’ve given several congressional testimonies where my goal was to put into the official record certain documents and information that the major news media didn’t put in during the Vietnam War.
One result was that a professor read my testimony about the Khmer Rouge plan for genocide in Cambodia and put me in his book “Betrayal In Vietnam”, Prof. Lou Fanning, 1977. It was based on a secret document I got through the National Security Council and had declassified. It was the only document of its type to be put into a congressional hearing concerning Vietnam and Cambodia if the communists won.
I have done this with several other testimonies/studies because my hope was to not only have it presented to Congress at the time of the testimony, but also to make it available to decent journalists and scholars from then on.
Sometimes you can win by losing. You just have to know how to play the game.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.