Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Should voters have to prove citizenship to register? (SCOTUS to hear arguments Monday)
MSN ^ | March 17, 2013 | Jacques Billeaud and Jesse J. Holland

Posted on 03/17/2013 12:29:44 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana

The Supreme Court will hear arguments over the legality of Arizona's requirement that prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to register.

SNIP

The high court will hear arguments Monday over the legality of Arizona's voter-approved requirement that prospective voters document their U.S. citizenship in order to use a registration form produced under the federal "Motor Voter" voter registration law that doesn't require such documentation.

This case focuses on voter registration in Arizona, which has tangled frequently with the federal government over immigration issues involving the Mexican border. But it has broader implications because four other states — Alabama, Georgia, Kansas and Tennessee — have similar requirements, and 12 other states are contemplating similar legislation, officials say.

The Obama administration is supporting challengers to the law.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections; US: Arizona
KEYWORDS: citizenship; constitution; electionfraud; illegalaliens; motorvoter; skeeter; sukz; votefraud; voterfraud; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Dilbert San Diego
Well, voter ID has been upheld by the Supreme Court. One must be a citizen to legally vote. It seems like a logical extension of documenting identity and eligibility to vote.

The only reason this issue is before SCOTUS is that Congress passed the Motor Voter Act in 1994, which permitted people to register to vote without showing proof of citizenship. The issue is whether that Congressional statute trumps the state law.

61 posted on 03/18/2013 3:22:52 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

If they don’t uphold this, it’s all over except the crying (although I’ve already shed many tears already)

UNREAL that this is even an issue.


62 posted on 03/18/2013 4:11:49 PM PDT by SueRae (It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Personally, I think all immigrants legal or illegal should not be able to vote for 10 years after entering this country. Am I too hard?


63 posted on 03/18/2013 4:12:56 PM PDT by lwoodham (I am Andrew Breitbart. Don't doubt me on this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lwoodham
No.
No immigrant in the USA should ever be allowed to vote.

When or if, an immigrant becomes a USA citizen, they are no longer immigrants.
If, for any reason, legal immigrants refrain from seeking full citizenship, they must also refrain from voting, and certain other civic duties.

There are no “undocumented immigrants”.

There are only foreign citizens who are granted various degrees of legal temporary or long term welcome as guests, or legal immigrants pending full citizenship applications.

Any other foreign citizens are illegal aliens, and/or criminal invaders.

All adult citizens, OTOH, no matter whether they are naturally born or were formerly immigrants, should be required to vote. (IMHO)
And each ballot contest/question should include a “none of the above” option.

64 posted on 03/18/2013 5:53:10 PM PDT by sarasmom (The obvious takes longer to discover for the obtuse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: sarasmom

let me guess,... the Supeream Court will rule that undocumented voters “have a right to choose”, or some other such aliceinwonderland reasoning as they always do


65 posted on 03/18/2013 10:26:29 PM PDT by KTM rider ( Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana

Roberts will back the DOJ.


66 posted on 03/19/2013 7:06:54 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Runner

Roberts is now in the liberal camp of SCOTUS, he cannot be counted on.


67 posted on 03/19/2013 7:07:28 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Fawn
This should NOT even be questioned!!! What is wrong with this stupid country.

The answer to your question is:

Everything. We have become the laughing stock of the civilized world, and an inviting target for all of the maniacs in power everywhere.

68 posted on 03/19/2013 7:12:50 AM PDT by 4Runner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; ..

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

69 posted on 03/19/2013 11:11:34 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; All
“Fathom the arrogance and hypocrisy by our Government
that requires every citizen to prove they are insured under ∅Care™…
but not everyone,
including voters, must prove they are a citizen of the U.S.”

~ Enhanced version from Ben Stein quote


70 posted on 03/19/2013 9:30:11 PM PDT by QT3.14 (Loyalty to the country always. Loyalty to the government when it deserves it. - Mark Twain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: entropy12; P-Marlowe

This question depends entirely on whether there is a right to vote or whether there is a right for citizens to vote.

In the first case, you take anyone who shows up.

In the 2nd case, you take only citizens who show up.


71 posted on 03/20/2013 6:47:36 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: xzins
This question depends entirely on whether there is a right to vote or whether there is a right for citizens to vote.

FWIW the founders never intended for the citizens to have a direct vote for either the President or the Senate. They wanted those offices free from the political pressure of the masses in order to assure that we never had the kind of government that we now have, i.e., a Robin-Hood style democratic electorate that could vote themselves money from the treasury.

72 posted on 03/20/2013 7:36:04 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

You are exactly right about that, and we have bastardized the electoral college which was designed to pick a president and not be a superfluous extension of a popular vote.

In that sense, we are NOT a republic. And it’s been for the worse.


73 posted on 03/20/2013 7:53:14 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Here is Obama's voting base:


74 posted on 03/22/2013 5:36:30 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoctorBulldog

ping


75 posted on 03/24/2013 4:05:58 PM PDT by white trash redneck (Just one of B. Hussein Obama's "typical white people")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson