Posted on 03/08/2013 5:22:06 PM PST by Kaslin
Well, it took longer than I thought, but a government has finally out-greened itself. In the great state of Washington, the legislature wants to tax… wait for it …breathing.
“Holy exhalations!” you say, “Is it true?”
Yes old chum, I’m afraid it is. It would appear the folks on Washington’s equivalent of a capitol hill have come up with a transportation package that tabs out at 10 billion clams, which is a lot, even for a coastal state. Okay, that was a lousy play on words. MOVING ON THEN…
Actually $10 billion is a lot of money, even in a day and age in which the national debt probably increased by that much in the time it has taken me to put the period at the end of this sentence.
So from where will all these dollars flow? Well, from a gasoline tax naturally. Anymore you can’t have a left-wing state without a gasoline tax on all of those icky carbon spewing vehicles. C’mon, you should have been able to guess that one on your own!
But according to a handy flyer provided by the Seattle Times, a gas tax is only part of the plan. There is also an increase in the commercial gross weight fee, a Motor Vehicle Excise Tax, a Hazardous Substance Tax, two bonds (“Bond” is a nice word for “taxes”, by the way.) and… drumroll please…a $25 tax on bicycles that cost more than $500. The legislators in Washington figure that should garner about a million bucks for roads.
What?
Yup, Washington State wants to tax bikes. The legislature there want to tax gas saving, non-polluting bikes powered by the human machine that emits no disgusting substances to befoul the air. You might be tempted to say “Hey, bicyclists use the road, they ought to pick up at least some of the tab.” And you would be right. But according to one legislator, it is the amount of carbon exhaled by cyclists that merit them getting hit with this tax. And imagine my chagrin when I discovered it was a Republican spouting this bit of nonsense. In an article on The Examiner website by Mikael Thalen, GOP State Representative Ed Orcutt is quoted as saying: “A cyclists [sic] has an increased heart rate and respiration. That means that the act of riding a bike results in greater emissions of carbon dioxide from the rider. Since CO2 is deemed to be a greenhouse gas and a pollutant, bicyclists are actually polluting when they ride."
Insert laugh track here.
So, a Washington Republican finally succeeded where Jacque Cousteau, Sir David Attenborough, England’s Prince Phillip, and Ted Turner could not- he has pinned climate change onHomo sapiens. And apparently also on his semi-high-end bike.
I know folks who eschew cars for bikes because of the cost and because they want to lessen their personal carbon footprint. That’s fine, do as thou wilt, oh pilgrim. They are put out by motorists who don’t give them the space they need, or call them “dirty hippies” as they drive by. Conversely, I know motorists who are annoyed by what they perceive to be an elitist attitude by cyclists, who seem intent on making themselves a nuisance on streets and roads. That’s a debate for another time. (Personally, I just wish they would not ride so close to the white line on the side of the road. I always think they are going to swing out into traffic.)
What is germane to this discussion is that bicycles have at best a barely discernible impact on roads. That, and in this case we are essentially talking about what amounts to BREATHING TAX. The problem with that is breathing is one of those things everyone does. Unless you are a fetus, a corpse or an astronaut, you are at this moment inhaling and exhaling; and apparently inflicting damage on the atmosphere.
A story goes that Mark Twain was once trapped by a bore who lectured him at length on the Great Hereafter. The man said to Twain: “Do you realize that every time I exhale some poor soul departs this world?” Twain is reported to have replied “Really? Have you tried chewing cloves?”
Apparently for the elected officials of the Evergreen State, chewing cloves will not suffice.
They feel it is time to tax people simply for existing.
I get so mad when I see bicyclists riding right through stop signs without stopping. It also ticks me off when they ride against traffic. Why do they think that traffic laws are for anyone but them?
Journalism is the lowest form of both educational majors at the college level and professional occupations.
People advance only for their ability to find sensationalism or political advantage in the stories they cover, or their personal physical attributes.
I have nothing against bicycle riders as long as they ride with the traffic and not against the traffic. Of course they should always ride on the extreme right so not to endanger themselves
Have you ever sat at an intersection and seen how few CARS stop at stop signs?
Oh I know that, and I can give you an example that I never forget. Fort Campbell BLVD which is Highway 41A is a six lane highway (3 lanes going south into Clarksville, TN and lanes going north into KY. Plus it has a turning lane for turning left. A few years ago I was driving south on the highway on the right lane and had to stop because the traffic light was red. Another car had stopped next to the turning lane. Suddenly a driver of a car drove right through the second lane, the one between the right lane where I was and the other car that had stopped on the left lane. Luckily no turning traffic came.
Watching the video, I have to ask you: Do you stop directly at a stop sign, because many times you can not even see the traffic coming if you do, so you have to move a few feet forwards until until you do. Stopping at a 4-way stop sign is no problem
“This is being pushed by a Republican in a snarky effort to humiliate Democrats.”
Mission Impossible.
Humiliation requires shame, guilt, honor.
Seen a Democrat with those attributes? I haven’t.
The only thing that works is ridicule, and you have to keep it simple.
Dale's teasing. He does that. He's a lot like al baby. He's really a nice older guy, with a beautiful wife.
Despite the nonsense, does a person riding a $500+ bicycle breathe more than a person riding a $499 or less bicycle?
Just wait until they factor in leguminous methane...
Cyclists should have to carry liability insurance to cover the damage that they do.
And yes, they DO do damage and they ARE responsible for pedestrian injuries and deaths.
Yep so they can’t ride their fancy bikes. I bet it’s already been passed as an amendment under a passed law which doesn’t remotely have anything to do with that law passed. That’s how the jerks local, state and federal do it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.