Skip to comments.
Andrea Mitchell: I Share Same 'Concern' As Obama Admin—Hagel Won't Get Vote
NewsBusters ^
| Mark Finkelstein
Posted on 02/15/2013 11:35:28 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
Andrea Mitchell/Barack Obama: same struggle! In an stunningly blatant display of solidarity with the Obama line, Andrea Mitchell declared on today's Morning Joe that she shared the same "concern" with the White House: that poor Chuck Hagel wouldn't get a final vote on his nomination.
Mitchell prefaced her "concern" by roundly condemning Republicans in general--and Senator Ted Cruz in particular--for supposedly attacking Hagel with allegations "completely unsupported by fact." Could somebody please tell me why Mitchell, supposedly a reporter, should so shamelessly be toting the White House's water this way?
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: andreamitchell; barackobama; chuckhagel; msm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...
Even to a jaded old MSM watcher like me, this degree of open support by Andrea Mitchell for the Obama line is shocking/sickening. Ping to Today show list.
2
posted on
02/15/2013 11:38:04 AM PST
by
governsleastgovernsbest
(FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
So what Andrea Mitchell is saying is that his struggle is my struggle.
3
posted on
02/15/2013 11:39:03 AM PST
by
SpaceBar
To: SpaceBar
The only struggle SHE has is with objectivity.
4
posted on
02/15/2013 11:40:11 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
It’s astonishing that Mrs. Alan Greenspan is so blatant in her bias, but that’s what NBC pays her for. And she needs the cash for her monthly face lift.
5
posted on
02/15/2013 11:40:44 AM PST
by
txrefugee
To: Pharmboy
6
posted on
02/15/2013 11:41:45 AM PST
by
al baby
(Hi Mom)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
In an stunningly blatant display of solidarity with the Obama line, Andrea Mitchell declared ...
How could anyone be stunned by this? The Obama media in general, and Andrea Greenspan in particular, have dropped any pretense of objectivity. Even some of the brighter of the low information voters get that.
The Obama administration has their own, completely controlled, media arm. If Democrats had any intelligence, or any shred of morals, they'd be horrified at what the lack of media scrutiny of the current president is doing to the republic.
For that reason, I hate media members with an uncommon passion.
7
posted on
02/15/2013 11:43:06 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Republicans had any spine, they’d tell Dingbat Harry that he’ll get a vote on Hagel as soon as he allows a vote on a budget.
8
posted on
02/15/2013 11:45:20 AM PST
by
chrisser
(Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
To: al baby
About 15 years ago, I met her and her husband (and hubby’s bodyguard) on an Amtrak to NYC. We small-talked for a few sentences, and she was pleasant, he would not look at me. Her face is terribly pock-marked; I felt sorry for her (for a moment). But, she did have a tight little bod back then, and great legs. I report, you decide.
10
posted on
02/15/2013 11:58:57 AM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must.)
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: governsleastgovernsbest
12
posted on
02/15/2013 12:18:30 PM PST
by
pabianice
(washington, dc ..)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Andrea Mitchell declared on today's Morning Joe that she shared the same "concern" with the White House: that poor Chuck Hagel Robert Bork wouldn't get a final vote on his nomination. Mitchell prefaced her "concern" by roundly condemning Republicans in general--and Senator Ted Cruz Kennedy in particular--for supposedly attacking Hagel Bork with allegations "completely unsupported by fact."(Imagine there are media).
13
posted on
02/15/2013 12:27:22 PM PST
by
rfp1234
(Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
To: rfp1234
Erratum: that should say ‘jackasses’ instead of ‘Republicans’.
14
posted on
02/15/2013 12:29:02 PM PST
by
rfp1234
(Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
To: Pharmboy
15
posted on
02/15/2013 1:21:32 PM PST
by
rlmorel
(1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Ye gads...this woman is 66. Go away. Retire. Please.
16
posted on
02/15/2013 1:26:17 PM PST
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Because she won’t or can’t think for herself.
She sold her soul to the devil.
17
posted on
02/15/2013 1:30:37 PM PST
by
ADSUM
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Mitchell prefaced her "concern" by roundly condemning Republicans in general--for supposedly attacking Hagel with allegations "completely unsupported by fact.I don't know why she is acting so shocked. 99% of her news stories are the same way.
18
posted on
02/15/2013 2:06:00 PM PST
by
VeniVidiVici
(Obama's vision - No Job is a Good Job)
To: rlmorel
19
posted on
02/15/2013 3:26:13 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Why should she care?
Just report the news, B####!
20
posted on
02/15/2013 3:44:53 PM PST
by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
