To: netmilsmom; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; an amused spectator; Diogenesis; MEG33; PGalt; ...
Even to a jaded old MSM watcher like me, this degree of open support by Andrea Mitchell for the Obama line is shocking/sickening. Ping to Today show list.
2 posted on
02/15/2013 11:38:04 AM PST by
governsleastgovernsbest
(FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
So what Andrea Mitchell is saying is that his struggle is my struggle.
3 posted on
02/15/2013 11:39:03 AM PST by
SpaceBar
To: governsleastgovernsbest
It’s astonishing that Mrs. Alan Greenspan is so blatant in her bias, but that’s what NBC pays her for. And she needs the cash for her monthly face lift.
5 posted on
02/15/2013 11:40:44 AM PST by
txrefugee
To: governsleastgovernsbest
In an stunningly blatant display of solidarity with the Obama line, Andrea Mitchell declared ...
How could anyone be stunned by this? The Obama media in general, and Andrea Greenspan in particular, have dropped any pretense of objectivity. Even some of the brighter of the low information voters get that.
The Obama administration has their own, completely controlled, media arm. If Democrats had any intelligence, or any shred of morals, they'd be horrified at what the lack of media scrutiny of the current president is doing to the republic.
For that reason, I hate media members with an uncommon passion.
7 posted on
02/15/2013 11:43:06 AM PST by
brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
If Republicans had any spine, they’d tell Dingbat Harry that he’ll get a vote on Hagel as soon as he allows a vote on a budget.
8 posted on
02/15/2013 11:45:20 AM PST by
chrisser
(Senseless legislation does nothing to solve senseless violence.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
To: governsleastgovernsbest
12 posted on
02/15/2013 12:18:30 PM PST by
pabianice
(washington, dc ..)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Andrea Mitchell declared on today's Morning Joe that she shared the same "concern" with the White House: that poor Chuck Hagel Robert Bork wouldn't get a final vote on his nomination. Mitchell prefaced her "concern" by roundly condemning Republicans in general--and Senator Ted Cruz Kennedy in particular--for supposedly attacking Hagel Bork with allegations "completely unsupported by fact."(Imagine there are media).
13 posted on
02/15/2013 12:27:22 PM PST by
rfp1234
(Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Ye gads...this woman is 66. Go away. Retire. Please.
16 posted on
02/15/2013 1:26:17 PM PST by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Because she won’t or can’t think for herself.
She sold her soul to the devil.
17 posted on
02/15/2013 1:30:37 PM PST by
ADSUM
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Mitchell prefaced her "concern" by roundly condemning Republicans in general--for supposedly attacking Hagel with allegations "completely unsupported by fact.I don't know why she is acting so shocked. 99% of her news stories are the same way.
18 posted on
02/15/2013 2:06:00 PM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(Obama's vision - No Job is a Good Job)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
Why should she care?
Just report the news, B####!
20 posted on
02/15/2013 3:44:53 PM PST by
hattend
(Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
BOTH of them are Sad Sacks.
21 posted on
02/15/2013 3:48:23 PM PST by
Ann Archy
(ABORTION........the HUMAN sacrifice to the god of CONVENIENCE.)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
24 posted on
02/15/2013 4:12:10 PM PST by
timestax
(AMERICAN MEDIA= DOMESTIC ENEMY)
To: governsleastgovernsbest
89-10.
This whole thing is a goon show, and that’s all it is. There is no resistance to “Obama” in the Senate.
26 posted on
02/18/2013 10:10:08 AM PST by
Jim Noble
(When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
