Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iceland Considers Pornography Ban (first Western democracy to block online porn?)
Telegraph UK ^ | 13 Feb 2013 | Staff

Posted on 02/14/2013 6:08:31 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o

The government is considering introducing internet filters, such as those used in China, in order to stop Icelanders downloading or viewing pornography on the internet.

The unprecedented censorship is justified by fears about damaging effects of the internet on children and women.

Ogmundur Jonasson, Iceland's interior minister, is drafting legislation to stop the access of online pornographic images and videos by young people through computers, games consoles and smartphones.

"We have to be able to discuss a ban on violent pornography, which we all agree has a very harmful effects on young people and can have a clear link to incidences of violent crime," he said.

Methods under consideration include blocking access to pornographic website addresses and making it illegal to use Icelandic credit cards to access pay-per-view pornography.

A law forbidding the printing and distribution of pornography is already in force in Iceland but it has yet to be updated to cover the internet.

The proposals are expected to become law this year despite a general election in April.

"There is a strong consensus building in Iceland. We have so many experts from educationalists to the police and those who work with children behind this, that this has become much broader than party politics," Halla Gunnarsdottir, a political adviser to Mr Jonasson told the Daily Mail.

The proposed control over online access...is justified as a defence of vulnerable women and children.

"Iceland is taking a very progressive approach that no other democratic country has tried," said Professor Gail Dines, an expert on pornography and at a recent conference at Reykjavik University. "It is looking a pornography from a new position - from the perspective of the harm it does to the women who appear in it and as a violation of their civil rights."

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: assault; child; internet; littlewomen; moralabsolutes; porn; sm; woman; womenmeannothing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last
Porn opponents say they are taking it from a "new" perspective, "from the perspective of the harm it does to the women who appear in it and as a violation of their civil rights."

As far as I know, that's not new: societies have long been concerned about protecting women and children (and young males, for that matter), because of the links between "transgressive" sexual entertainment, and, well: transgression.

It will be argued that arousal/stimulation doesn't impact attitudes and behavior.

Really?

Advertizing doesn't ramp up demand?

Arousal patttern training doesn't affect arousal pattern?

All those billions of dollars to Madison Avenue are for nothing, because exciting visual stuff doesn't fuel what people consider exciting or desirable? It has no impact on what people want to have or get, or how they want to have it or get it?

A conversation-starter.

1 posted on 02/14/2013 6:08:41 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; Dr. Brian Kopp

LJ, you have mail.


2 posted on 02/14/2013 6:10:18 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I am glad we have a 1st Amendment to protect us against this silliness.


3 posted on 02/14/2013 6:16:07 AM PST by Perdogg (Mark Levin - It's called the Bill of Rights not Bill of Needs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

A ban on not attending church would be more helpful.


4 posted on 02/14/2013 6:17:43 AM PST by Rennes Templar (Business owners work harder! You have to support millions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Sounds like an idea worth considering


5 posted on 02/14/2013 6:19:18 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

It’s in the dead of winter up there...lack of sunshine makes people do screwy things.


6 posted on 02/14/2013 6:21:00 AM PST by mkboyce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; Lazamataz
Obviously the Icelanders didn't see this...
7 posted on 02/14/2013 6:26:51 AM PST by JRios1968 (I'm guttery and trashy, with a hint of lemon. - Laz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Do you really want the Govt controlling an Internet filter?


8 posted on 02/14/2013 6:27:21 AM PST by Perdogg (Mark Levin - It's called the Bill of Rights not Bill of Needs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I definitely don’t think we should go the other way and legalize kiddie porn like pervertland Japan


9 posted on 02/14/2013 6:29:57 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

In before the, “This thread is useless without pics!” comment.

Seriously, advertising works. So does porn. It serves a purpose, to entertain and stimulate. That raises several questions: Is the stimulation from porn good or bad?

If it’s bad, does government have the right to ban or control it? What if a community wants to permit it?

If government has a right to ban or control porn, how does one effectively do that without affecting other harmless information. For example, would filtering stop the picture of a nude woman? What about medical journals? Art?


10 posted on 02/14/2013 6:30:51 AM PST by CitizenUSA (Why celebrate evil? Evil is easy. Good is the goal worth striving for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

Please answer my question, do you want a US Gov agency to control what we view on the internet? Kiddie porn is already illegal and should remain so.


11 posted on 02/14/2013 6:35:21 AM PST by Perdogg (Mark Levin - It's called the Bill of Rights not Bill of Needs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA

While it is a nice thought, all it would achieve would be to create a new, profitable, black market.


12 posted on 02/14/2013 6:36:50 AM PST by Little Ray (Waiting for the return of the Gods of the Copybook Headings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o; don-o
Porn made me the man I am today. I have a heaping helping of porn for breakfast, a light porn snack, then a healthy porn lunch, a midday porn pick-me-up, then some serious close up hard-core porn for supper.

Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn Porn

13 posted on 02/14/2013 6:37:53 AM PST by Lazamataz (Republicans have the same policies as the Democrats, except for the part where they win elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

I dont think it’s silly.


14 posted on 02/14/2013 6:41:07 AM PST by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CitizenUSA
If it’s bad, does government have the right to ban or control it?

An irrelevant debate, since it will be impossible to control access to internet pornography regardless of what laws are passed.

15 posted on 02/14/2013 6:44:12 AM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Mrs. Don-o
Observe and Serve: RESOLVE to SAVE the U.S.A. Free Republic Original Content | Jan 8, 2012 | By Laz A. Mataz
16 posted on 02/14/2013 6:44:21 AM PST by don-o (He will not share His glory and He will NOT be mocked! Blessed be the name of the Lord forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Kiddie porn is already illegal and should remain so

You must have missed that thread last week. Libertarians are all in favor of it.

The government should make laws, not carry it out. The President already has a "kill switch", so I guess this is all academic anyways.

17 posted on 02/14/2013 6:48:12 AM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Silly? Desperate times call for desperate measures?

I do take issue with the “poor women” tack taken with pornography by cultures that want to have their cake and eat it, too. How are the men acting in porn or the men watching it not degraded also? And how do all those poor lil’ ladies end up as adult performers? Greed couldn’t have anything to do with it...

The Bible—the most honest book on sex in the world—hardly portrays women as sexual innocents. Quite often they are the predators.


18 posted on 02/14/2013 6:49:22 AM PST by avenir (I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

>>”Iceland is taking a very progressive approach that no other democratic country has tried,” said Professor Gail Dines, an expert on pornography

I thought it was the progressives that wanted porn in every classroom?


19 posted on 02/14/2013 6:54:20 AM PST by Betis70 ("Leading from Behind" gets your Ambassador killed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I’m for blocking Porn on all ISP’s, how’s that for a thought starter.


20 posted on 02/14/2013 6:55:31 AM PST by Rappini (Veritas vos Liberabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson