Posted on 02/11/2013 5:05:53 AM PST by libstripper
Many of us have questioned what caused Roberts to switch his vote on ObamaCare at the last minute, as reported by CBS, and doing so, so late that the Conservative Justices were forced to rewrite their majority opinion to be minority dissent. These facts may answer that question.
In 2000 Justice Roberts and his wife Jane adopted two children. Initially it was apparent that the adoptions were "from a Latin American country", but over time it has become apparent that the adopted children were not Latin American, but were Irish. Why this matters will become evident.
In 2005 the NY Times began investigating Roberts life as a matter of his nomination to the Supreme Court by George Bush. The Times was shortly accused of trying to unseal the adoption papers and intending to violate the anonymity of the adoption process... however there is more to the story.
(Excerpt) Read more at libertycaucus.net ...
Like a naturalized White person born in Capetown calling themselves "African-American"
I came across it because Patriot Action Network emailed me a link to the article yesterday. Hence, my posting of this January 29 article about two weeks after it was published.
About half the Congress--the rest go along willingly.
Truth29: “And if there is a shred of truth in this description, conservatives need to finish the investigation and expose Roberts.”
Agreed, but they might want to take their time about it. If Roberts is indeed the left’s puppet, the senate would probably not vote to impeach him. Even if they did, President Obama would simply appoint another puppet. He’s already nominated two of them!
There’s no way to fix this mess easily or quickly. The one thing we have going for us? Even though the US Constitution apparently means Congress can do almost anything it wants, Congress can also undo everything if we someday have conservative majorities and a conservative president. That seems impossible, but short of collapse or revolution—events that would likely have worse outcomes—there’s zero hope of undoing any of this.
We’ve got to keep trying, politically...peacefully.
No matter the cause. !!!!!
If you can not interpret LAW according to the Constitution as intented, you do not deserve to be a judge/justice, let alone a supreme court justice and chief justice.
But, that would include more than half on the SC right now.
That's my great fear. He pulled the legally nonsensical argument for Obamacare's constitutionality out of his fundament at the last moment. Blackmail is the most logical explanation for what he did. He certainly didn't improve the reputation of the Court or prove himself to be an intellectual giant by doing it. Hence, the process of elimination leads to that one, horrible conclusion. The First and Second Amendments are both at mortal risk.
Combine the ideology of a hard leftist with the horsepower of the Chicago political mob and you have a dangerous force.
Wise FReepers pointed out in 08 that the Baraqqis had intimidated the Clintons over Arkancide and BJ & Hill couldn’t use their vaunted private detective squad to reveal Baraq’s true history.
That’s my daily prayer.
If this is true, then John Roberts is a bastard beyond belief. To put yourself before your country’s welfare is beyond reprehensible.
If these adoptions were planned out well in advance, would the [Irish] adoption laws have been legally skirted if the Irish mothers gave birth in the unnamed Latin American country?
What kind of interesting deals would have been arranged in order to set that up? Heck as long as I am wondering, maybe the mothers didn’t even become pregnant in Ireland. They could have been used as brood mares to produce Irish children outside of Ireland and its laws.
I suppose it would really peg the weird-o-meter if the kids resemble Roberts. Hard to say from the few pics on the internet.
Perhaps the Irish adoption laws angle is a red herring. Are there Bambino farms in Brazil? Is any theory too far out there for this lawless bunch?
Ugh. Time for the brain bleach.
To me it looks like he did just that. The most galling part of his opinion was the statement that Obamacare was duly passed by Congress. To make that howler he had to overlook all the force and fraud that was applied to get it passed and how two Senate elections were out and out stolen. The first was the MN one where the DemonRats stuffed the ballot boxes to elect Franken and the second was the Alaska election where DemonRats in the “Justice” department framed Ted Stevens.
Brain bleach? Just think about the dirt Obama has on Sotomeyer or Kagin. Yikes.
Ack! “Thanks!”
(Do they sell 5 gallon value bottles?)
All of those FBI files the Clinton’s absconded with had to go somewhere.
“John Roberts a bastard”.
As you say ...... if true it means he is a typical unethical - corrupt politician who puts self interest in front of country, and that makes them highly vulnerable to blackmail.
Evidently Roberts arranged...this adoption through some ...trafficking agency, that got the children out of Ireland and into that Latin American country...thereby circumventing two Irish laws -- entirely illegal, but perhaps quasi-legitimized by the birth mothers (two) transporting the children out of Ireland...
The writer seems to equate this with slavery. In fact it was a largely self-less agreement between four adults to the benefit of two children.
No government has any business restricting such personal transactions, IMO.
If Roberts caved, he did far worse than the obamacare ruling.
I think that after the information in them were copied, they went back to the fbi. The information went into various Democrat data banks.
Even if he is gay, that’s not the issue Obama would use to blackmail him. Hits too close to home. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.