Getting stomped on is one of the “fun” things here on FR. =)
God forbid you try to be rational, no can do!
Another question I had is are they investigating ANY of his claims? Of course not. I’m sure he would be proven correct.
He named names, places, situations. What about the ex cop he dated and broke it off with. She then tried to hack into his account, had the proof it was her and yet denied him....once again.
Seems like his 1st “offense” was trying to rectify the abuse his partner inflicted on a mentally ill “perp”, whom was kicked twice in the stomach and once in the face, AFTER he was in cuffs.
In regards to the officers that were “ambushed”. They lay blame on him. Have you heard of any evidence that came out confirming it was indeed him? Perhaps I missed it.
Someone in another thread stated now that this story is all over the place, real criminals can use it to “take out the fuzz”, and of course the blame would be put squarely on him.
“In regards to the officers that were “ambushed”. They lay blame on him. Have you heard of any evidence that came out confirming it was indeed him? Perhaps I missed it.”
One of the officers survived and said it was him and I don’t see why he would lie about that. They were at a stop light and Dorner appeared and shot them. This attack was at the beginning of this thing and I don’t think a copy cat would have started this fast, plus a copy cat wouldn’t have known where these cops were going. Granted, a copy cat could have just walked out and shot them, not knowing where they were going, but why would the one not killed lie about who it was? No matter who it was, it wasn’t going to get him in trouble.