Skip to comments.
The Voter Fraud That ‘Never Happens’ Keeps Coming Back
National Review ^
| 2/8/2013
| John Fund
Posted on 02/08/2013 9:56:43 AM PST by Nachum
Critics of voter ID and other laws cracking down on voter fraud claim theyre unnecessary because fraud is nonexistent. For instance, Brennan Center attorneys Michael Waldman and Justin Levitt claimed last year: A person casting two votes risks jail time and a fine for minimal gain. Proven voter fraud, statistically, happens about as often as death by lightning strike.
Well, lightning is suddenly all over Cincinnati, Ohio. The Hamilton County Board of Elections is investigating 19 possible cases of alleged voter fraud that occurred when Ohio was a focal point of the 2012 presidential election. A total of 19 voters and nine witnesses are part of the probe.
Democrat Melowese Richardson has been an official poll worker for the last quarter century and registered thousands of people to vote last year. She candidly admitted to Cincinnatis Channel 9 this week that she voted twice in the last election.
This is how Channel 9′s website summarized the case:
According to county documents, Richardsons absentee ballot was accepted on Nov. 1, 2012 along with her signature. On Nov. 11, she told an official she also voted at a precinct because she was afraid her absentee ballot would not be counted in time.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: election; electionfraud; official; ohio; voted; votefraud; voterfraud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: manc
I agree.
Someone once wrote:
"Stolen?
Then you should get right on this and prove it."
First watch 8 minutes 16 seconds of video titled
Romney defeated Obama - if not for voter fraud.
Then ...
read and think about this. Someone
wrote:
"I believe there was voting fraud,but that it was not the reason Romney lost.
Even without fraud he would still have lost. "
I don't completely agree.
Someone said,
"Were not victims or battered wives as someone else suggested" Playing the victim? Really?
Yes we had a weak field.
Only about 38 percent of the Republicans supported Romney in the Primary.
So 62 percent voted AGAINST
"Establishment Republican" Romney.
Who was it that dumped all those negative adds on Conservative Candidates in the primary?
Who was it that constantly battered each leading Conservative in the primary with an average of three to one negative ads against our real candidates?
Who's money was dumped against the conservative choices?
Victim? Do you really believe that Romney got ZERO votes in 68 Precincts?
Do you really believe it was an accident that when some people voted for Republican candidate Mitt Romney, the machine appeared to change it to the Democrat candidate Barack Obama?
I believe there WAS ENOUGH Voter Fraud to throw the 80 Electoral College Votes from Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, and Florida.
I also believe that had Romney SAVAGED Obama, like he SAVAGED the Conservatives that ran against him in the Primary, Romney would have gotten more votes in the General election.
So yes, it's Romney's fault, but there WAS ENOUGH VOTER FRAUD to steal the election for Obama.
Do you really believe that Democrats didn't intentionally vote more than once for Obama?
Denying being a victim of voter fraud doesn't help.
But getting the
criminal enterprise of the Obama Judicial System to prosecute the guilty who stole this election, is a lost cause.
Remember, it doesn't matter who has the votes,
it matters who COUNTS the votes.
Romney might have won, but with Obama's Criminals running the "Justice Department", they'll never admit Romney won.
Black States = States Obama won by Voter Fraud. Click the state for more information.
Photo Credit: Barackofraudo.com
21
posted on
02/09/2013 2:34:46 AM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Nachum
May I be put on ping list, please?
Funny how those of us “conspiracy nuts” here on FR keep finding more confirmation of possible fraud...
Yet we’re still crazy!!!
To: Nachum
May I be put on ping list, please?
Funny how those of us “conspiracy nuts” here on FR keep finding more confirmation of possible fraud...
Yet we’re still crazy!!!
To: ricmc2175
We the People can't begin to think about a Presidential win in 2016 UNTIL WE SETTLE THE ISSUE OF THE LEFT'S CONTROL OF THE VOTE BY WAY OF PROGRAMMING A CODE INTO THE VARIOUS MACHINES THAT WILL AUTOMATICALLY CHANGE THE NAME OF THE REPUBLICAN/CONSERVATIVE CANDIDATE TO THAT OF OBOMA. Look up the testimony of a senior programmer who testified at a hearing in either Ohio, Michigan, can't remember which state it was, in which he said that the left had inserted a code into the voting machines in certain areas that would change the name of Romney into Oboma, as soon as the first letter, R, was punched in. Most people had no idea that this was happening, although I read that a few did find out. I know of a Republican judge in Chicago who related the story that her voting place was made up of mostly seniors. She heard from people waiting in line to vote that they were disgusted with oboma, many of them were from Eastern Europe and knew he was a socialist, and they weren’t going to vote for him. Well, lo and behold when the judges learned the results of the vote for their precinct, they were shocked to learn that it was a landslide win for oboma! And how do you explain that but to say that the machines were rigged/coded to change the Romney to Oboma.
We are not going to win any elections as long as oboma is in power, unless WE get control of the voting process and make it a paper ballot, and that we flood the voting places with Conservatives judges who will stand up and speak out against voter fraud. Also, we must insist that each voter present a photo ID...comparing signatures is hit and miss and crooked when you have the left doing the comparing.
The Republicans/Conservatives must learn from the left on how to conduct a voting campaign. And they had better learn it fast. Bottom line, oboma must be removed from OUR White House by any means available.
24
posted on
02/09/2013 3:45:56 PM PST
by
itssme
To: itssme
And I’d bet BHO is already laying the ground work for voter fraud in 2014 with the goal of flipping the House and holding the Senate.
BHO’s 2012 campaign committee has morphed into a non-profit PAC, instead of dissolving. Link: http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/Obama-campaign-PAC-support/2013/01/18/id/472145
So while most of America is debating gun rights, sequestration of the military, Obamacare, runaway spending etc.... BHO’s “new” non-profit is quietly laying the groundwork to repeat the 2012 elections in 2014, at the state and local level. While at the same time putting road blocks to Voter ID laws, which would destroy the demorats efforts at stealing another election.
To: Yosemitest
great post.
For 4 years this machine from Chicago had the DOJ etc and had 4 years to look at where they could do their fraud to get back into power.
All those Dem counties came out to vote and yet they lost more votes from swing voters and lost more counties and even states.
My state obama lost more counties, more came out to votwe again him in the other counties and yet all of a sudden in a bad economy the rat voters in those Dem controlled counties came out in WI, VA, FL OH AND yet polls, people seeing stickers and signs said that he was too lose.
the GOP and the other RINOs in our party stay silent or say I’m as bad as those Gore voters in 2000 and it makes us look bad.
So it seems we ignore fraud on a massive scale in the Dem controlled counties because we don;t want to upset the apple cart
26
posted on
02/09/2013 5:03:27 PM PST
by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: manc
Your enemy sets the rules, so you have to descend to his level of civility, to fight him.
Unless you're willing to move to the cartridge box, especially after he's filled the so called "justice department" with Fabian Socialists crook, who think they're above the law.
"Justice delayed" and "Justice denied" IS CRUELTY to the righteous.
27
posted on
02/10/2013 4:28:54 AM PST
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Nachum
Electoral democracy rarely defeats or displaces full-bore Marxist governments—and almost NEVER on a national level.
Communists will NOT let themselves be “voted out” of office. They don’t go gently into that good night. You can look it up.
28
posted on
02/10/2013 4:56:21 AM PST
by
PaleoBob
To: pterional
Voter fraud is violence, it can decide who has authority to use force on the population.
29
posted on
02/10/2013 11:33:40 AM PST
by
correctthought
("Obamunism is a temporary setback on the road to freedom" - Liberty Prime)
To: Nachum
After _______ is out of the white house lots of people will be laughing about how much they cheated in the 2012 election.
30
posted on
02/10/2013 12:52:22 PM PST
by
Terry Mross
(Who long before America is no more?)
To: Nachum
You can’t pick up your vacation-hold mail at the P.O. without presenting a picture ID... racist Post Office.
31
posted on
02/10/2013 5:14:48 PM PST
by
4Liberty
(Some on our "Roads & Bridges" head to the beach. Others head to their offices, farms, libraries....)
To: Nachum
Don’t forget the ever present stuffing of the ballot boxes on college campuses, as well as the obvious supression of the military vote.
IMO, if the military can’t vote by way of ballot boxes on military bases, then these 0bama drones on college campuses shouldn’t be able to use them either.
32
posted on
02/10/2013 6:31:52 PM PST
by
2CAVTrooper
(Slaving away so obama supporting deadbeats can play)
To: 1010RD
After Daley delivered the White House to JFK via vote fraud and the GOP did nothing that greenlighted this for Dems nationally. I suspect its mostly used in Dem on Dem crimes. Even if Nixon had taken Illinois' electoral votes in the election of 1960, it would not have changed the election results. The tab was Kennedy 303, Nixon 219, with 15 unpledged democratic electors.
I have no doubt that there was massive voter fraud in Chicago but it did not elect Kennedy. Illinois had 26 electoral votes at the time.
33
posted on
02/11/2013 3:27:48 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
(_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
To: Graybeard58
You’re right, but you can’t leave out the fraud in Texas. LBJ did his part. I don’t recall the numbers exactly, but I think Nixon would have been about 267 or so. He lost Hawaii on a recount. With Illinois and Texas Nixon would have won. Double check it, but I believe Nixon should have been President.
34
posted on
02/11/2013 12:37:54 PM PST
by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: 1010RD
but I believe Nixon should have been President. I did not vote for Nixon in 1960 but I agree with you.
(I was only 15 years old at the time and not being a democrat, I wasn't allowed to vote at that age.)
35
posted on
02/11/2013 12:49:35 PM PST
by
Graybeard58
(_.. ._. .. _. _._ __ ___ ._. . ___ ..._ ._ ._.. _ .. _. .)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson