To: E. Pluribus Unum
How would you change the policy? This is one policy I do not dislike.
6 posted on
02/05/2013 2:38:27 PM PST by
chopperjc
To: chopperjc
Even the old USSR at least went to the effort of a “trial in absentia”.
10 posted on
02/05/2013 2:46:23 PM PST by
jiggyboy
(Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
To: chopperjc; Nachum; jiggyboy
Article I Section 9 Clause 3:
“No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.”
In the time honored tradition of classic despots, Hussein is unconstitutionally attainting American citizens.
13 posted on
02/05/2013 3:07:29 PM PST by
Jacquerie
("How few were left who had seen the republic!" - Tacitus, The Annals)
To: chopperjc
So you don't have a problem with a star chamber that can decide to kill anyone they deem worthy for whatever secret reasons they choose?
You better hope you don't get on their radar.
24 posted on
02/05/2013 5:40:46 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
To: chopperjc
How would you change the policy? This is one policy I do not dislike. So we can kill them without due process, but we can't waterboard them because waterboarding doesn't kill them?
Do you see the disconnect there?
25 posted on
02/05/2013 6:05:13 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson