Posted on 02/04/2013 9:48:13 AM PST by jimbo123
Sure, Nate Silver was on-point during the 2012 election, but before you place your bets behind the bespectacled number genie, remember that he predicted that this would be a Seahawks-Patriots Super Bowl and that he's gotten a little better at the politics game than anything else.
But in a column for The New York Times Magazine published online today, Silver breaks down his latest mumbo-jumbo over S.R.S. rankings and something called the Defense-adjusted Value Over Average, which is exciting if you're a statistician groupie just not if you're a Baltimore Ravens fan. In the end, Silver seems to call it for San Francisco:
(Excerpt) Read more at theatlanticwire.com ...
Predictions are always more accurate when you have inside information. :-)
Stop just one play,...108 kickoff return,...and you win. Just one play. But no.
Yes, but you can also say that about other things that went wrong for the 49’ers. I figured before the game that they would lose, because the odds of winning every Super Bowl was against them. I mean, 6 out of 6, very unlikely.
From The Atlantic.
The Atlantic....famous for fish s**t, old wrecks and crabs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.