Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Evolution, where's the Link? (Saturbray)
www.brayincandy.com ^ | 1/26/12 | bray

Posted on 01/26/2013 8:46:52 AM PST by bray

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: James C. Bennett; bray

Thanks for that article. I notice that it refers to the Arch. skeptics simply by their last names, without reference to their characters or motives. That’s typical for scientific articles, and in stark contrast to the link provided by the original poster, which constantly refers to scientists who disagree as “certified believers” and “the faithful.” Talk about your thug tactics!


61 posted on 01/26/2013 12:16:15 PM PST by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: bray
So give us some proof if it is so obvious and been so well documented.

There isn't "proof," there's just lots and lots and lots of evidence. But you're not really interested in evidence, are you?

62 posted on 01/26/2013 12:22:11 PM PST by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: James C. Bennett

Thank you, that was quite interesting. It is unfortunate that there are so many who will not accept the article’s conclusions.


63 posted on 01/26/2013 12:23:53 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: abclily

Sorry. I have a low tolerance for willful ignorance.


64 posted on 01/26/2013 12:37:46 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

I don’t know how old the earth is and it doesn’t matter what I believe. This is about what proof there is about evolution.


65 posted on 01/26/2013 12:56:33 PM PST by bray (Welcome to Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

When you don’t have proof or evidence it is easier to name call which is all you have.

Pray for America


66 posted on 01/26/2013 12:58:38 PM PST by bray (Welcome to Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: stormer

You have nothing but name calling to protect your precious belief. Talk about Pot/Kettle.

Pray for America


67 posted on 01/26/2013 1:00:15 PM PST by bray (Welcome to Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

Because it’s SCIENCE!?

A Bombs, H Bombs, ICBMs, The EMP Bomb, Scientist!


68 posted on 01/26/2013 1:11:59 PM PST by Rock N Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

I know. I had to laugh at myself when I saw that. Damn thing is, I previewed several times before posting...


69 posted on 01/26/2013 2:20:21 PM PST by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bray
When you don’t have proof or evidence it is easier to name call which is all you have.

I didn't call you a name. I said you weren't interested in evidence. Your original post makes it clear that you're ignorant of how much evidence there is and don't understand what you do know about. And you seem to like it that way.

If you gave any sign of having read #49 and comprehended it, and tried to rebut it in a serious way, it might be worth presenting you with other evidence. Somehow I don't think that's gonna happen.

70 posted on 01/26/2013 4:34:04 PM PST by Ha Ha Thats Very Logical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: bray
On the top of mountains, miles in the sky, we find sea fossils, fossils of creatures that no longer exist. It not only tells of vast lengths of time where the land was slowly pushed to the top but of change to life itself. When you date the layers using the natural decay of radioactive elements the answers paint a consistent story the world over. They use to date layers by the fossils in them and radioactive dating only confirms their conclusions. I could go through your claims step by step and counter your points but I would not hit upon the real reason you stick by them. You believe you do Glory to God by absolutely following the Bible. I understand your desire to be righteous and how the Bible forms the very base of what you believe is right and wrong.

Would you give a 5 year child the keys to your car, a credit card and a shopping list expecting the supplies to dinner would soon arrive? Of course not! God reveals truths to men only when mankind is ready for them. God is the most reasonable Being in the universe but men where not ready for the full story until they had experienced the fruits of reason over many centuries. They would have resisted much as you do today. Now you do a disservice to God by insisting on staying in childhood when the rest of the world has grown up. Your insistence on a certain story only makes others think belief in God is childish . I know you want to do right by God, but the world will not accept him if it means being blind to truths revealed about his universe and God knows this country needs God more than ever today!

71 posted on 01/26/2013 7:05:31 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

So we should just accept atheism because it may offend the world? How’s that worked out?

Pray for America


72 posted on 01/26/2013 7:31:04 PM PST by bray (Welcome to Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: bray
Another fake statistic from the Darwinists

So the difference is 95% rather than 99%. The point is that we are similar to these creatures because they are the close to the point where Evolution branched. The Theory predicts all life is related , that it all starts from the same root. It is confirmed by DNA similarity as well as similarities among characteristics.

Here is a site with lots of info and debate but the debate was settled over a century ago, I only argue the subject at all because I want it to stop getting in the way of a belief in God. A strong belief in a righteous and reasonable God would stop this slide into socialist hell we are falling into. You won't convince many to join with the Lord if you require blind adherence to an ancient tale. A reasonable and loving God is strongest force for good any society can have!

73 posted on 01/26/2013 7:42:53 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bray
So we should just accept atheism because it may offend the world? How’s that worked out?

It's worked out TERRIBLE. That is why I argue with you, because I want people to get back to God, but they won't do that if they think it is the realm of stubborn people who are incapable of reasonable argument. Leading by example is the best way to convince others to join your cause.

74 posted on 01/26/2013 7:52:32 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

“bigger than any book Man has written about him” ?

Ye do err not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God.


75 posted on 01/26/2013 7:56:46 PM PST by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Doulos1
Ye do err not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God.

Do you believe in Zeus? Allah? There is no shortage of those who claim to speak for God. The real scripture of God is written in the fabric of the Universe itself. God has given us eyes to see and a mind with which to THINK. Truth is eternal but that does not mean man is ready for it yet. Can you imagine Genghis Khan with atom bombs? Our views of God have to change with time . Life is a test and like any good test tempting answers that are WRONG will be among the choices.It is the function of our mind to decide what to keep and what to reject.

76 posted on 01/26/2013 8:17:35 PM PST by Nateman (If liberals are not screaming you are doing it wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

God’s Word is truth, whether we believe it or not.
God magnified His Word above His name.
Does the word “jot and tittle” mean anything?
Study to show yourself approved.
I can recommend an E.W. Bullinger Study Bible as a start.
Good luck on your quest.


77 posted on 01/26/2013 8:40:16 PM PST by Doulos1 (Bitter Clinger Forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Nateman

http://books.google.com/books/about/The_Seashell_Mountaintop.html?id=FCKgXiomACAC


78 posted on 01/26/2013 11:06:10 PM PST by stormer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Nateman
Blind adherence to an ancient tale? I call it faith not blindness. Perhaps it is you that is blindly adherent?

Ever consider that? Pray for America

79 posted on 01/27/2013 7:57:52 AM PST by bray (Welcome to Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Ha Ha Thats Very Logical

More name calling, well done. I read 49 and quoted from it. It is a bunch of evolutionists who were lukewarm that they couldn’t prove it true but would not confirm the fraud. Even they admitted the skeptics could be right about the fraud, that’s the best you have is a paper by Darwinists agreeing a fraud was not a fraud?

You are worshiping a religion called atheism and won’t admit it for pride.

Pray for America


80 posted on 01/27/2013 8:01:50 AM PST by bray (Welcome to Obamaville)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson