It’s a wonderful parting gift from Comrade Panetta. 8>)
1. Take one healthy US military and slice along hamstring. Trim with blunt cleaver, taking $500 Billion, sprinkle with Homosexuality. Remove War on Terror and set aside never to be used again.
2. Roast over slow flame, trimming bone and muscle as it rotates. Baste with mission to aid Muslim Brotherhood.
3. Smother Christian chaplains and Jewish rabbis, while liberally adding in paganism, Islam, and witchcraft. Add "Repeal of Don't Ask Don't Tell" training to entire military, and intimidate into submission.
4. Cover with America's wives and daughters, and roast under hot broiler.
5. Trim away remaining $600 Billion using Sequestration Ax (must be blunt).
6. Serve cold on large platter.
Wonder how long it’ll take women to realize reality doesn’t care about their gender.
If this policy is approved, there should be a caveat ...
Any woman in front-line combat unit who gets pregnant while assigned in a combat zone, along with the father of the baby [if also military], should be cashiered with dishonorable discharges.
Combat units in a combat zone have their number of personnel assigned for a reason - they are NEEDED on a 24/7 basis. Current military policy is to remove female support personnel from a combat zone when found to be pregnant.
If a woman assigned to a combat unit in a combat zone gets pregnant, she may not be able to be easily replaced in a timely fashion. This reduces the combat strength of the unit and potentially places the other members of the unit in mortal jeopardy.
It is no different than desertion in a combat zone ...
NOw I know the term Warrior Queen come from LOL!
Ambiguous, I suppose my old line( probably garnished or stolen from someone else) is the pink bayonet squad is now a reality. Ann Barnhart aside, there are few men that make it in those spec ops and front line units so I suppose divide by ten or fifty and you have one bad a## woman. I know there were/are Ruskie, Chicom, NVA and Israeli womens teams/units but, I dunno, someone else probably has a better anser than my non-answer.
I can see this going really well.
Women suing because of sexual harassment.
Women suing because of emotional distress.
Women suing because of job discrimination.
Women suing because they don’t have their own bathrooms.
And on and on and on...
This is a recipe for disaster. But then again, this is what our government does. CREATES PROBLEMS!
The engineered deconstrution of the United States continues.
Good. Just think of it as more lib women getting their a$$es blown away.
I’m sure the men in their unit have decided amongst themselves the girls cannot be relied upon.
Perhaps they’ll leave the girls to “their own devices” to prove themselves as men....and get rid of them
Sorry to be so harsh...actually I’m not sorry. A girl wants to pretend to be a man...face the consequences.
Sometimes I am actually happy to be the age I am—an age when over half my life is over. I’d hate to have to grow up in this country now.
Sorry, ladies, but you don’t belong in the front lines. Never, ever, never.
The new Confederate Army and Marines, that forms in response to CWII, won’t have queers and split tails in the ranks....
Yeah.. Wait until AFTER the election to announce this, 0bama. Wouldn’t want to lose the female vote! FUBO! This is 0bama’s insurgent government’s ploy to DRIVE DOWN ENLISTMENTS.. Blue Helmets will bridge the gap. Ready folks?
We are living in an age of pure insanity
Well, throw in a bunch of homos along with feminazis and institute a human wave ROE.
Let women pay their share of the butchers bill. They will have had enough after the first few.
But we will no longer be a world power in the meantime.
So how many qualified men will be replaced by women to fill a quota? I know feminists and the politically correct will deny it, but men are stronger, faster, and can carry heavier loads. Thems the facts, Jack. Physical fitness standards for men in the military have already been lowered because they were too high for women. Now this?