Skip to comments.NY Assemblyman exposes real gun control CONFISCATION agenda of Democrats
Posted on 01/20/2013 7:59:54 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather
In this video, NY Assemblyman Steve McLaughlin is asked to keep quiet a proposal by Democrats to confiscate guns:
(Excerpt) Read more at therightscoop.com ...
Here it is. This is the video where I was asked to keep the Democrat proposals for the NY SAFE Act away from the public. This list was given to me by a colleague and it is not confidential.
This bill was an attack on the 2nd amendment and the Democrats clearly wanted to dismantle the work of the Founding Fathers. None of these amendments were included in the final bill thanks to us fighting back. I will not stand silent while these unpatriotic proposals are pathetically thrown at us a 11 oclock at night:
1. Confiscation of assault weapons 2. Confiscation o ten round clips 3. Statewide database for ALL Guns 4. Continue to allow pistol permit holders information to be replaced to the public 5. Label semiautomatic shotguns with more than 5 rounds or pistol grips as assault weapons 6. Limit the number of rounds in a magazine to 5 and confiscation and forfeiture of banned magazines 7. Limit possession to no more than two (2) magazines 8. Limit purchase of guns to one gun per person per month 9. Require re-licensing of all pistol permit owners 10. Require renewal of all pistol permits every five years 11. State issued pistol permits 12. Micro-stamping of all guns in New York State 13. Require licensing of all gun ammo dealers 14. Mandatory locking of guns at home 15. Fee for licensing, registering weapons
And people scoff at conservatives like Rush who have been saying for years that Democrats want to confiscate weapons.
It’s unfortunate that Che is not around to deal in his special way with ‘rat lawmakers.
Wait.....wait......are you trying to tell me there actually exists....an honest Democrat???????????????????
My bad...just checked; he’s a Republican. Whew....thought I’d have to reboot my mindset. All is well.
If you don’t mind, I’m going to post the YouTube video from what you’re referring to. Not everyone has a FB account.
AND, while I was on his page, I found another video. He’s the real deal...good stuff.
I say “Bring it on!” and then the SCOTUS will bitch-slap these Dems with 4 simple words: “Shall not be infringed.”
You're kidding, right? You seriously think the self identified "Wise latina" and the other hard left liberals on the court will support individualy liberty?
"Expose" for something that is well known to all is a bit of a misuse of the word. "Confirm yet another time." might be a better way of saying it.
This is exactly the reason that the second amendment exists. The right to self protection. Protection from a tyranical state and its use of a state militia and police force to impose its will.
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
The founders feared a militia might degenerate into an armed gang of thugs or would take orders from a tyrant. The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. means that citizens needed to be armed to ensure that any militia was regulated and would not be used by the government against the people.
New York State is setting up the conditions that our Founding Fathers sought to prevent.
Good idea and thanks a lot. That will help some of the people to be able to see the video.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.