Skip to comments.
White House Calls NRA Ad "Repugnant and Cowardly"
Reuters via Fox CT ^
| Tuesday, January 16, 2013
| Steve Holland
Posted on 01/16/2013 8:55:37 AM PST by kristinn
SNIP
"Most Americans agree that a president's children should not be used as pawns in a political fight. But to go so far as to make the safety of the president's children the subject of an attack ad is repugnant and cowardly," White House spokesman Jay Carney said
(Excerpt) Read more at ctnow.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; nra; obama; secondamendment; sidwellfriends
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: kristinn
Oooh, NRA hit a little too close to home with that ad. Take it to the fascist bitches in DC.
21
posted on
01/16/2013 9:42:38 AM PST
by
Trod Upon
(Civilian disarmament is the precursor to democide.)
To: Mr. K
The NAACPs’ and race baiters’ favourite word is repugnant. Obama is taking a page out of his NAACP lessons. Like racist, repugnant is one of the key vocabulary words used by the rhetoric spinners.
To: kristinn
“You are cowardly” he said bravely standing behind a line of gun barrels as thick as spines on a hedgehog.
23
posted on
01/16/2013 9:52:50 AM PST
by
DManA
To: kristinn
But it’s okay for Dear Leader to hide behind children.
24
posted on
01/16/2013 10:10:20 AM PST
by
SkyDancer
(Live your life in such a way that the Westboro church will want to picket your funeral.)
To: kristinn
The White Hut is certainly no stranger to "Repugnant and Cowardly."
25
posted on
01/16/2013 10:56:08 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(TYRANNY: When the people fear the politicians. LIBERTY: When the politicians fear the people.)
To: gwjack
Obama-all hypocrisy, all the time.
To: kristinn
A person surrounded by armed guards 24/7 is in no position to call anyone “cowardly”.
27
posted on
01/16/2013 11:26:41 AM PST
by
Ellendra
(http://www.ustrendy.com/ellendra-nauriel/portfolio/18423/concealed-couture/)
To: Ellendra
Finally!!! Thank you for saying it.
28
posted on
01/16/2013 12:13:50 PM PST
by
OldEagle
To: kristinn
FoxNews Bret Baier’s All Star panel, Charles Krauthammer, Juan Williams, and Steve Hayes, all called the NRA ad a mistake, vile and repugnant.
I guess they all believe that the elite should have armed protection for their children, but not for ours.
Krauthammer even went so far as to say, of course the President's children should be protected because of who the President is and out kids don't need that type of protection.
What about kids of policemen, judges, FBI, ATF, correctional officers, etc? Their children may be targets because of who their parents are. Don't they deserve armed protection too?
The NRA did not call for taking away the right of the President to protect his children, but to give our kids the same right and not to make them sitting ducks in a gun free zone.
To: FR_addict
According to Krauthammer then, I guess the kids at Sandy Hook didn’t count. It’s okay for these kids to be sitting ducks as long as they weren’t kids of the elite.
To: kristinn
31
posted on
01/16/2013 5:03:13 PM PST
by
nascarnation
(Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson