Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cliff Deal Hinges on Senators
Wall Street Journal ^

Posted on 12/28/2012 5:14:01 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Cliff Deal Hinges on Senators White House Meeting Ends With Expressions of Cautious Optimism From Both Sides on Negotiations By JANET HOOK and CAROL E. LEE

WASHINGTON—The job of averting year-end tax increases and spending cuts landed squarely on the Senate, whose leaders said Friday they would launch a last-ditch weekend effort to avert the so-called fiscal cliff.

President Barack Obama met with all four congressional leaders in an hourlong meeting in the Oval Office to review an increasingly narrow range of options.

He later said he was "modestly optimistic" a deal could be reached, echoing comments from the top Democrat and Republican in the Senate.

"We had a good meeting down at the White House and we are engaged in discussions…in the hopes that we can come forward as early as Sunday" with a plan, said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.). "We'll be working hard to try to see if we can get there in the next 24 hours," he said, adding he was "hopeful and optimistic."

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D., Nev.) agreed the meeting was "constructive." In a warning that seemed aimed at lawmakers in both parties, he said, "whatever we come up with is going to be imperfect."

Mr. Obama said Messrs. McConnell and Reid have the weekend to reach and pass a deal.

In a move meant to pressure Republicans, Mr. Obama asked Mr. Reid and House Speaker John Boehner (R., Ohio) to bring up a bill to extend income-tax rates for income under $250,000 and unemployment-insurance benefits if Senate leaders can't reach an agreement. "The hour for immediate action is here, it is now," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 112th; fiscalcliff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
Screw em all..............
1 posted on 12/28/2012 5:14:09 PM PST by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

It is totally a political problem.

EVERYBODY, including the rats, knows that the meaningless, drop-in-the-bucket tax hike on “the rich” does next to nothing to address America’s debt and deficit and is, rather, a purely symbolic concession demanded by the rats for the sole purpose of dividing and ultimately destroying the GOP. The rats need the GOP to abandon its most consistent and important core principle and agree to a tax hike - - ANY tax hike - - and then they will beat the GOP to death. The American public will never believe the Republicans again, and the party will die.

This is why Ubanga wouldn’t bite on the “close loopholes and cap deductions” crap in lieu of a definite rate hike. Even though the revenues would be about the same, with the “close loopholes and cap deductions” plan the Republicans would be able to talk out both sides of their mouth when trying to convince the ignorant chattering class that they didn’t raise taxes. Ubanga wants something more concrete, something the Republicans can’t lie their way out of.


2 posted on 12/28/2012 5:18:31 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
How is this even Constitutional, when all "Ways and Means" bills MUST originate in the House of Representatives?

ARTICLE I, Section 7

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

3 posted on 12/28/2012 5:19:44 PM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The Rinos and the Rats will form a coalition in the Senate to screw us
again. Same with the House. Pelosi will provide the Rat votes needed
to screws us there.
May the 2014 election be a pox on both parties.
Throw all the bums out election on both sides.


4 posted on 12/28/2012 5:20:47 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

This is a win for Boehner. He has been saying for two weeks that the House already passed tax cuts and the Senate needs to act.


5 posted on 12/28/2012 5:21:58 PM PST by ez (When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

We went over the cliff years ago.


6 posted on 12/28/2012 5:24:07 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Ubama has such a great job.

Just make up a meaningless term like "fiscal cliff" and watch the monkey's fall all over themselves.

7 posted on 12/28/2012 5:24:54 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum ("Democracy is indispensable to socialism. The goal of socialism is communism." --Vladimir Lenin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

It looks like McConnell is getting ready to sell us down the river.


8 posted on 12/28/2012 5:25:15 PM PST by Buddy Sorrell ( Boehner, our Vichy Speaker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ez

ha ha ha... the senate is actually going to vote on something. Incredible

who cares about whether this is a win for Boehner it is a circus and Americans win nothing but higher taxes and more regulation while politicians pat themselves on the back until they can retire to their various million dollar jobs as lobbyists


9 posted on 12/28/2012 5:27:35 PM PST by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ez

North Korea is what brought Obama back to the table. He knows he can’t let the defense cuts occur in the face of intercontinental ballistic capability in North Korea.The Republicans should force him to keep and make permanent all of the current tax rates. He can’t let the cuts go through and then come back and argue for a huge increase in anti-ballistic missile technology. It wouldn’t be good for the caliphate or any other supra-national grouping you could name, U.S. security aside.


10 posted on 12/28/2012 5:29:49 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
Ubama was re-elected President of the Democrats of the United States of America - - congratulations to him. I'm sure he feels pretty good about that, invincible even, and that's probably why he looks so arrogant these days and figures he can issue threats and act with impunity like a bully. Well, I sure hope somebody has the balls to clue that scumbag Ubama in that his Chicago thug way of doing things just isn't going to fly with a Republican House. Nobody likes to be bullied.

He also needs to be told flat out that if he wants more money confiscated from working, taxpaying, traditional American families (the "Republican base") in order to continue buying the votes of the ignorant moocher class (the "Democrat base"), then he's first going to have to get a Democrat House elected.

No, I am not holding my breath that any Republican has the balls to talk to the scumbag Ubama in a language he understands.

Oh well... Let's all limber up so we can grab our ankles. Here comes a "deal".

11 posted on 12/28/2012 5:37:04 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buddy Sorrell

Like Boehner, McConnell is but a single vote. Just like when Boehner caved, it will mean nothing when McConnell caves because whatever concessions he makes will never get through the house.


12 posted on 12/28/2012 5:37:21 PM PST by wolfman23601
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: longfellowsmuse
who cares about whether this is a win for Boehner

I do for one.

It's good to see the people's House score one (even though a little one) for a change.

Also good to see Hairy Reid have to back down.

13 posted on 12/28/2012 5:38:51 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gusopol3
He can’t let the cuts go through and then come back and argue for a huge increase in anti-ballistic missile technology

Good point. His base would have a fit.

14 posted on 12/28/2012 5:42:05 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Yes raise our taxes and we vote you out. Just like last tax hike. Adios senators.


15 posted on 12/28/2012 5:45:19 PM PST by FlyingEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

The Leftists in Congress have no intention of not going over the cliff. Failure to prevent massive tax hikes means lots more money for them to abuse. The current situation is “either we come to an agreement or you give us everything we want.”


16 posted on 12/28/2012 5:47:04 PM PST by ctdonath2 (End of debate. Your move.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
Throw all the bums out election on both sides.

Really? Are we back to this silly populist sounding nonsense? This "throw all the bums out" stuff has never worked. It's a meaningless statement. If you throw a Republican out, you're going to get a Democrat who is more liberal. Period. There are no candidates from any other party's that are going to win these seats. It's either Republican or Democrat. If you throw a Republican out, you get a Democrat. If you throw a Democrat out you get a Republican. If you have a "throw all the bums out election" the House would switch to Democrat control and the Senate to Republicans which would result in no meaningful change.

17 posted on 12/28/2012 5:54:03 PM PST by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969; tennmountainman
This "throw all the bums out" stuff has never worked.

You're right it doesn't work. That's why other measures must be taken. Extreme measures.

18 posted on 12/28/2012 6:05:13 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

“statement. If you throw a Republican out, you’re going to get a Democrat who is more liberal. Period. There are “

Same thing, different label. The R version differs only on how fast it wants to travel to the same destination.


19 posted on 12/28/2012 6:09:31 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (Gone rogue, gone Galt, gone international. Gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Longbow1969

“statement. If you throw a Republican out, you’re going to get a Democrat who is more liberal. Period. There are “

Same thing, different label. The R version differs only on how fast it wants to travel to the same destination.


20 posted on 12/28/2012 6:09:31 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion (Gone rogue, gone Galt, gone international. Gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson