Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodbye, fluorescent light bulbs: New lighting technology won't flicker, shatter or burn out
Phys.org ^ | December 3, 2012 | NA

Posted on 12/11/2012 9:51:04 PM PST by neverdem

Goodbye, fluorescent light bulbs! See your office in a new light

Enlarge

Wake Forest University physics professor David Carroll works with graduate student Greg Smith on new FIPEL lighting technology. Credit: Ken Bennett, Wake Forest University photographer

Say goodbye to that annoying buzz created by overhead fluorescent light bulbs in your office. Scientists at Wake Forest University have developed a flicker-free, shatterproof alternative for large-scale lighting.

The lighting, based on field-induced polymer electroluminescent (FIPEL) technology, also gives off soft, white – not the yellowish glint from fluorescents or bluish tinge from LEDs.

"People often complain that fluorescent lights bother their eyes, and the hum from the fluorescent tubes irritates anyone sitting at a desk underneath them," said David Carroll, the scientist leading the development of this technology at Wake Forest. "The new lights we have created can cure both of those problems and more."

The team uses a nano-engineered to convert the charge into light. This allows the researchers to create an entirely new – overcoming one of the major barriers in using plastic lights in and homes. The research supporting the technology is described in a study appearing online in advance of publication in the peer-reviewed journal Organic Electronics.

The device is made of three layers of moldable white-emitting polymer blended with a small amount of that glow when stimulated to create bright and perfectly white light similar to the sunlight prefer. However, it can be made in any color and any shape – from 2x4-foot sheets to replace office lighting to a bulb with Edison sockets to fit household lamps and light fixtures.

This new lighting solution is at least twice as efficient as compact fluorescent (CFL) bulbs and on par with LEDs, but these bulbs won't shatter and contaminate a home like CFLs or emit a bluish light like LED counterparts.

"If you wanted blue lights, discos would still be popular. You want lights that have a spectral content that is appealing to us inside of a building," Carroll said. "You want a light that won't shatter and create a hazmat situation while your children are around."

Carroll's group is the first to make a large-scale FIPEL that can replace current office lighting and is based on natural white light. Beyond office and home lighting, Carroll sees potential uses for large display lighting, from store marquees to signs on buses and subway cars.

FIPELs also are long-lasting; Carroll has one that has worked for about a decade.

Wake Forest is working with a company to manufacture the technology and plans to have it ready for consumers as early as next year.

Carroll is the Director of the Center for Nanotechnology and Molecular Materials at Wake Forest University. Center scientists have developed innovative technology including highly efficient plastic solar cells; Power Felt, a fabric that can use body heat to charge small electronics; and a combination solar-thermal heat pump.

Provided by Wake Forest University search and more info website


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: fipel; lightbulb; lightbulbs
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 12/11/2012 9:51:11 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The libs couldn't wait for technology to find a marketable solution and wasted loads of time and money mandating CFLs and demonizing incandescent lights. Well, here it is, most likely. Cheaper to use than CFLs, better light quality, unbreakable, no mercury vapor risks and moldable to unlimited forms.

Where do we go to get that eco-wacko-wasted money back?

2 posted on 12/11/2012 10:04:22 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If it ain’t 35 cents a bulb, it’s no improvement.


3 posted on 12/11/2012 10:07:46 PM PST by DesertRhino (I was standing with a rifle, waiting for soviet paratroopers, but communists just ran for office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

“field-induced” — sounds an awful like EM transmissions. I wonder what the Human race is going to look like 10,000 years from now. Will we be born ‘wired in’ with our own biological network receivers?

That is of course if we survive.


4 posted on 12/11/2012 10:11:14 PM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo
“field-induced” — sounds an awful like EM transmissions. I wonder what the Human race is going to look like 10,000 years from now. Will we be born ‘wired in’ with our own biological network receivers?

That is of course if we survive.


I seem to remember something similar that came out in the 1970's to this, but I can't remember the specifics.

I keep thinking if the old Zager and Evans song, "In the Year 2525....."

I know they had electroluminescence back in the 1950's, I have an old Life Magazine from 1956 that showed a whole room lit up with electroluminescent panels made by Westinghouse here in Pittsburgh. The 1960 Chrysler Imperial had an electroluminescent dashboard.
5 posted on 12/11/2012 10:21:41 PM PST by Nowhere Man (It is about time we re-enact Normandy, at the shores of the Potomac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

If it ain’t 35 cents a bulb, it’s no improvement.

It won’t be!!!


6 posted on 12/11/2012 10:48:11 PM PST by tallyhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nowhere Man

Heck, take a regular florescent light and hold it next to a CB antenna and key the mic.


7 posted on 12/11/2012 11:12:23 PM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Sounds good, but might not be intense enough to replace a 100 watt bulb.


8 posted on 12/11/2012 11:18:05 PM PST by VanShuyten ("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

So, these bulbs are ‘neverdim’?.........


9 posted on 12/12/2012 12:01:04 AM PST by Red Badger (Lincoln freed the slaves. Obama just got them ALL back......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VanShuyten

I bought a life time supply of 100 watt bulbs. We don’t often use them, so it’s not as bad as it sounds. But we sometimes use them for heat for things like plants outdoors that might be killed by really freezing temps, or maybe an engine that needs a little warmth in order to start in the AM.


10 posted on 12/12/2012 12:07:15 AM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Love the first comment in the article's website:

These filthy scientists are a threat to America's Light Bulb Freedom act.

If God wanted man to use Luciferian glowing devil sticks then he wouldn't have given the world the glory and beauty of the incandescent light. God's shining light.

Stop them while there is still freedom to be had.

11 posted on 12/12/2012 6:10:11 AM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: celmak; All

The “Real McCoy” is still available at newcadescent.com.


12 posted on 12/12/2012 6:54:40 AM PST by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

OK I see these are invented in America.

If production to replace the existing fluorescent bulbs is based in AMERICA, I’m all for this.

If it’s yet another scam to buy a bunch of imported bulbs, I say keep it unchanged.


13 posted on 12/12/2012 6:58:32 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Usagi_yo

I know, I once talked to someone who went to medical school in Mexico. They lived under the shadow of a 100kW AM station and when they need light, they brought out a few florescent bulbs from the closet and the station lit them up very bright and they studied that way. To “turn them off,” they put them back in the closet. That’s one way to save on the light bill. B-)


14 posted on 12/12/2012 9:43:01 AM PST by Nowhere Man (It is about time we re-enact Normandy, at the shores of the Potomac.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye
Where do we go to get that eco-wacko-wasted money back?

The refund department of the Bureau of Stupid Liberal Ideas is where you'll get your money back - it's located a stone's throw from NASA... the EPA also has a satellite office in DC.

15 posted on 12/14/2012 8:56:26 AM PST by GOPJ (Detroit should be renamed 'Michael Mooresville'...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: greeneyes

Those 100 watt bulbs are nearly 100% efficient as heaters. If they were marketed as such, they would get an EnergyStar award.


16 posted on 12/14/2012 9:01:34 AM PST by Fresh Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
If it ain’t 35 cents a bulb, it’s no improvement.

I wish we had a truly free market in lighting technology, so that you could indulge your short-sightedness with impunity.

17 posted on 12/14/2012 9:06:54 AM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fresh Wind

LOL. I never thought about it that way. LOL.


18 posted on 12/14/2012 1:04:09 PM PST by greeneyes (Moderation in defense of your country is NO virtue. Let Freedom Ring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks neverdem.
This new lighting solution is at least twice as efficient as compact fluorescent (CFL) bulbs and on par with LEDs, but these bulbs won't shatter and contaminate a home like CFLs or emit a bluish light like LED counterparts.
I've used and preferred CFLs for more than a decade, and it's abundantly clear that the older bulbs (some of which have just now had to be replaced) were much better than the cheap POSes being sold now. The new ones literally burn out in one or two uses about 20% of the time. I replaced three pretty dim bulbs in an old fixture at my mom's house with three much brighter and cooler CFLs, and literally the next time I turned it one, one was burned out.

The Dollar Tree is selling two packs of CFLs, I have a couple boxes but haven't tried them yet. Maybe tonight.

LEDs are underpowered and overpriced, and the gov't jackasses don't mandate direct comparisons between bulb types, IOW, it's a struggle to find Lumens on some of these, and that's the dealbreaker when one tries to use 'em. LEDs are supposed to be more efficient, yet when I add up the watts needed for the expensive multiple bulbs required to equal the light output of one CFL, they use more electricity.


19 posted on 12/15/2012 4:03:29 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 6SJ7; AdmSmith; AFPhys; Arkinsaw; allmost; aristotleman; autumnraine; Beowulf; Bones75; BroJoeK; ...

Thanks neverdem.

· String Theory Ping List ·
Cat Physicist
· Join · Bookmark · Topics · Google ·
· View or Post in 'blog · post a topic · subscribe ·


20 posted on 12/15/2012 4:04:07 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson