Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama to Hold ‘Private’ Swear-in Ceremony for Second Presidential Term
Intel Hub ^ | November 20, 2012 | Shepard Ambellas

Posted on 11/21/2012 9:48:58 PM PST by robowombat

Obama to Hold ‘Private’ Swear-in Ceremony for Second Presidential Term

Something is not right in America, take 2. By Shepard Ambellas theintelhub.com November 20, 2012

One month from now on January 20, 2013, President Obama will be required by law to be sworn-in for his second presidential term by noon. However, something mysterious is happening again with the ceremony raising the eyebrows of some. Since the 20th falls on a Sunday, a private ceremony will be held signifying the possibility of fraud as the “public” ceremony will be held the following day.

The fact is that even a deviation by even one single word during the ceremony (as admitted by Chief Justice Roberts in 2009) could signify an unlawful and unconstitutional swear-in as we saw four years ago at the public ceremony. Shortly after another “private” ceremony was held which caused quite a controversy at the time. Some speculate that the administration was hiding something as an executive order was signed by President Obama shortly after hiding all his records and possibly CIA activity.

The Washington Times reported on January 21, 2009 that, “President Obama took the oath of office a second time Wednesday night during a private ceremony at the White House, one day after the flubbing of the oath on Inauguration Day”….“We believe that the oath of office was administered effectively and that the President was sworn in appropriately yesterday. But the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of an abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath a second time.”

In a shocking interview on Tru News (18:00 in) startling information on Barack Obama was brought fourth. According to the interview, the man known only as Al is a debt collector who actually voted for Obama. During a recent skip tracing procedure on a Chicago debtor (a procedure carried out to verify data on the client; i.e. addresses, phone numbers, friends, social security numbers, etc.), Al came across a startling discovery when pulling the clients data. Michelle Obama pulled up (on the computer) as the debtors neighbor back in the 90′s. Out of curiosity Al clicked on Michelle Obamas name (link) and this allegedly pulled upBarack Obama’s name Chicago home address of 5046 S. Greenwood Ave, strangely enough owned by Obama’s accountant (according to AL). Also allegedly displayed in Barack Obama’s file was the allias name of Harrison J. Bounel.

Upon further investigation 6 different pin #’s in 6 years were assigned to the property — along with other evidence, Al believes that this type behavior signifies a multi layered real estate finance transaction. The social security number 042-68-445 also allegedly appeared in Obama’s file.

The file also allegedly showed trusts and a $1.2 million loan taken out from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac. If all the allegations are true — this suggests real estate fraud at minimum, and the possible fact that Obama’s house is a CIA safe house. 52 former addresses of Obama allegedly popped up as well. It has also been revealed that Obama’s birth certificate posted on the official White House web site is only digital (not a real certificate) and has been altered in many ways.

This is extremely bothering and should be the major issue at hand. Article II, Section I of the US Constitution states; “No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.” - Article II Section 1 of the United States Constitution.

In fact the whole “birther” issue has indeed been turned into a spectacle, not from the “birthers” themselves or people such as Donald Trump, but rather from the establishment and the controlled press. On every major news network across the board, echos of the same rhetoric bounce down the halls and out the TV screens spewing endless propaganda and lies at the American people surrounding this very important issue.

The real issue goes much deeper.

The true issue surrounding this is monumental, and contrary to what others are saying, it is frankly the most important issue at hand that Americans are facing right now.

Birth certificates have to be presented in a variety of circumstances. Some reasons include enrolling your child in little league, acquiring a driver’s license (in some states), and so on.

All department of Defense positions will require a birth certificate as well. And it doesn’t stop there. In fact, most people who have enrolled in the military can tell you that stringent background checks are done, including contacting various childhood friends of the possible enlistment. Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution was not put in place to be taken lightly. This is literally the frontline defense when it comes to warding off a foreign terrorist from gaining control of the helm of the United States of America.

A potential foreign terrorist grabbing full control of the nuclear button, the entire U.S. military, all government employees, soldiers, and assets and access to print trillions in fiat currency and/or give trillions bailouts to private interests, terror cells, and just plain comrades of a possible global crime syndicate via the Federal Reserve Bank; sounds important in my opinion.

Should someone in control of the nations entire nuclear arsenal, finical system, and it’s population be allowed to just skate by with no background check? If a “Rent-A-Cop” (security guard) needs such guidelines, surely the President does as well, this should be a no brainer. Especially when the entire nuclear arsenal is in the Presidents control. In fact, maybe they should go even further than that, expanding on the constitution. Maybe someone in charge of over 1500 nuclear weapons, should very well almost have to submit a DNA sample. Why not? You have to pee in a cup submitting DNA to work at some of the most mundane jobs (Just a thought).

The following is a recap of this article so far (to help put things in perspective): • I have outlined how it is truly a matter of national security and world security to let just anyone have the control of the U.S. Presidency • I have pointed out that lower ranking positions/carriers/licenses require individuals to submit their long-form birth certificate • I have defined how racism truly is not the underlying issue (as the media would like you to believe) • I have pointed out the “Operation Mockingbird” type rhetoric we are seeing in the media surrounding this issue • I have also established to true importance of this issue and how it is not a distraction (as most media would like you to believe)

Furthermore reporters such as Anderson Cooper and other icons such as Whoopi Goldberg continue to project the image that this issue is dead now following President Barack Obama’s release of the “alleged” long-form birth certificate (which by the way, is not recognized by the state of Hawaii as the official document at this time due to the fact that Obama had the law changed due to various lawsuits surrounding his citizenship including U.S. Supreme Court cases regarding this matter) this is pointed out by the Canada Free Press in the following excerpt;

“In order to accommodate Dictator-in-Chief Obama’s inability or refusal to provide his long form (NOT the short form COLB that is provided for even foreign-born residents of Hawaii) birth certificate, in April the State of Hawaii changed it policy on ALL long form birth certificates. Former director of the Hawaii Health Department Chiyome Fukino—who had been under fire for apparently acting as Obama’s agent in refusing to release his long form birth certificate to anyone—announced on 10 April that Hawaii will no longer provide legitimate long form birth certificates to anyone who was actually born in Hawaii.” – Canada Free Press In fact, this is where it takes a twist.

The certificate Obama officially released on the White House’s very own official website appears to be faked. The certificate in question has now been analyzed by many, including The Intel Hub and the Infowars teams.

Not only is the birth certificate presented most likely faked or a forgery (which is another criminal issue in itself), the very “Certification of Live Birth” (short-form) that Obama previously posted on the official White House website is now the only officially recognized form by the state of Hawaii.

I repeat, the new (alleged) long-form birth certificate is not recognized or distributed now by the state of Hawaii. Does this issue still sound racist to you? If it did turn out (and the evidence is in) that Obama is not a naturalized citizen and is responsible for criminal actions while in office colluding with a global crime syndicate what would be the repercussions?


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamaoath; obamaswearin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: robowombat; MestaMachine; KC_Lion; Godzilla; Domestic Church; dragonblustar; Oorang; jersey117; ...
.

.

Obama to Hold ‘Private’ Swear-in Ceremony for Second Presidential Term

(John Roberts redux? ... and the beat goes on, ♪La♫de♪La♫de♪deee♫ - ♪La♫de♪La♫de♪daaaa♫)

Check out article, then see # 22 showing how the Selective Service Card was altered.

.

41 posted on 11/22/2012 8:42:15 AM PST by LucyT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat; Absolutely Nobama; aragorn; Art in Idaho; Aurorales; autumnraine; azishot; ...
Slightly off topic ping…

Maybe it's slightly off topic, maybe not...

42 posted on 11/22/2012 8:49:04 AM PST by null and void (America - Abducted by Aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
inasmuch as there should be 9 numerals, not 8.

I've never seen a 9 digit SSN.

Please clarify.

43 posted on 11/22/2012 8:53:35 AM PST by null and void (America - Abducted by Aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

If it did turn out (and the evidence is in) that Obama is not a naturalized citizen and is responsible for criminal actions while in office colluding with a global crime syndicate what would be the repercussions?


If a tree falls in the forest...

What I would like to see is someone in the mainstream media play a little game. On a slow news day, they should “uncover” evidence that George w bush was using a few social security numbers and spent a year, the year he “may have been missing” from the Guard, in soviet Russia. Or some other enemy country. Just a few suspicious things, and declare that they think at least that these questions should be investigated. Especially since his father was the head of the CIA. Hmmm.


44 posted on 11/22/2012 8:55:41 AM PST by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Well the good news about it being private is that it will spare us from having to watch Justice Roberts and Obama tongue each other.


45 posted on 11/22/2012 8:59:57 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

Near the end of the article it reads “...responsible for criminal actions while in office...”. I am sure we all know that Barky just being in office is criminal and taking the presidency by fraud is probably the biggest criminal offense in US history.

Why does the little that is out there in “the news” focus on where he was born?

He uses his own voice in his audio book to proclaim his foreign father. There you have smoking gun #1. It’s right there. So simple. He has the old RINO establishment so afraid of being called racist, they’ll let a usurper dictate and ruin our country for 8 years, the second term to be the most damaging and irreversable.


46 posted on 11/22/2012 10:42:31 AM PST by TheConservativeParty ( 1447 days until Nov.8,2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I've never seen a 9 digit SSN.
Please clarify.

The original scheme implemented in 1936 by the Social Security Administration to assign an individual unique identification number was based on nine numerals divided into three segments:

o An "Area Number" assigned to a geographical area consisting of three numerals
o A "Group Number" consisting of two numerals issuable in an assigned Area o A "Serial Number consisting of four numerals and issued to one individual only.

The grouping appeared on the Social Security Identification Card in three blocks separated by hyphens, of the form AAA-GG-SSSS This system was in effect at least until 1972. I suppose there will come a time when all possible unique nine-digit unique numbers are in current use, so the fields will have to be expanded to provide more numbers. But right now I think the 9-digit system is sufficient.

There has never been an eight-numeral SSN, AFIK.

You have never seen an SSN that was either more or less than nine numerals, eh?

47 posted on 11/22/2012 5:08:22 PM PST by imardmd1 (Come and hear, all ye that fear God, and I will declare what He has done for my soul. Ps 66:16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

Yes. I had a brain fart.


48 posted on 11/22/2012 6:05:59 PM PST by null and void (America - Abducted by Aliens...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

“The file also allegedly showed trusts and a $1.2 million loan taken out from Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac.” That would be truly stunning, given that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac do not make direct loans to consumers. Definitely strong element of foil hat, with sprinkles.


49 posted on 11/22/2012 6:16:34 PM PST by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

Maybe this fraud was done in 2008?

As you can see, all the other examples of 1980 have 19 in front of the 80.


50 posted on 11/22/2012 6:49:39 PM PST by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

That’s the belief. That he (or Bill Ayers, George Soros, etc) realized he needed a valid SSC a bit late in the campaign.


51 posted on 11/23/2012 12:07:41 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America; Graewoulf; Candor7; edge919; rxsid
That’s the belief. That he (or Bill Ayers, George Soros, etc) realized he needed a valid SSC a bit late in the campaign.

An afterthought on the shopping list? "Ooops, we need eggs. Don't forget to buy eggs." What else did they forget, or what else did they remember to put in when it was almost too late?

52 posted on 11/23/2012 12:18:33 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: thecodont

He presented his birth certificate to America 2 years late.. His certification of eligibility presented to and signed off by the Speaker Pelosi is a story unto itself.. Hawaii got a different version than the other 49 States.


53 posted on 11/23/2012 12:23:02 AM PST by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America (IMPEACH OBAMA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

So why didn’t they cook all of this up in 1995 when they were busy getting BO’s political career launched?


54 posted on 11/23/2012 1:56:41 AM PST by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: robowombat; Fred Nerks

Obama will use a Koran to be sworn in instead of a Holy Bible? Therefore its a priovate ceremony?

Buahahahahaha! Its amazing.

Obama may as well swear in his dog in his place.

His presidency is over. He will not cow a free people with his antics. Bring it on a$$hole. You effing Muslim fascist a$$hat!


55 posted on 11/23/2012 6:18:16 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama fascism article:(http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America

I skimmed through Ayers’ Fugitive Days and seem to recall he was quite the forger, as needed...not an expert, but willing and ready to do what needed to be done.

And as long as I’ve got my foil hat firmly in place...I find it quite interesting that old Billy and his hag wife were hanging out in Egypt for a months, early in 2012. Gee....the place “the video” started a fuss. Surely, he was “just a guy in THAT neighborhood”....


56 posted on 11/24/2012 7:37:33 AM PST by Pigsley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
It's two months. The Constitution doesn't say how the oath must be sworn. If it were like the military oath, it would be sworn orally before an appropriate official, and a written copy would be signed. I think the Congress Critters are supposed to do it by signing as well, but I've read that many don't, thinking the oral version of their first term is sufficient.

That said, the Presidential oath is required before entering into the office. Taking it is necessary but not sufficient to make one President. One must also meet the Constitutional requirements, and get a majority of the electoral votes. All three are required. Just two doesn't cut it.

But when you get down to it. It doesn't matter, if the oath taker doesn't believe in the Constitution and is just mouthing the words, they won't uphold the oath anyway. There is no legal penalty for violation AFAIK, you can't even impeach them for violating their oath.. what you can impeach them for is in the Constitution. It's left an exercise for the reader to go look it up. :)

57 posted on 11/24/2012 2:46:23 PM PST by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat

I don’t think it’s foil hat at all. I think alot of people in DC KNOW he’s not eligible, and knowing that, the only way they can protect themselves against a treason charge is to do all this in private.

That was the very first thing that crossed my mind when he conveniently “flubbed” the oath the first time around.


58 posted on 11/24/2012 2:53:14 PM PST by djf (Conservative values help the poor. Liberal values help them STAY poor!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

“Otherwise, the Speaker of the House [Boehner] who will be sworn in on 3 January 2012 will be the President for [at least] 24 hours.”

If this happens, Mr. Boehner should take the opportunity to sign an executive order that instructs all federal agencies to desist in the execution and enforcement of any component of the Affordable Care Act. This would be predictably greeted in the press with howls of “constitutional overreach.” Yet such an order would be as legitimate as Obama’s various orders to see that selected laws such as DOMA and immigration laws are not enforced properly, despite the president’s clear constitutional duty to do so.

Even though the order would be quickly reversed by Obama, it would offer a useful opportunity to remind the nation of this president’s lawless rule.


59 posted on 11/26/2012 6:21:06 AM PST by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson