Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Powerful Supermajorities Elected to Statehouses
AP via Yahoo ^ | 11/20/12 | DAVID A. LIEB

Posted on 11/20/2012 4:21:51 PM PST by qam1

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — There's a new superpower growing in the Great Plains and the South, where bulging Republican majorities in state capitols could dramatically cut taxes and change public education with barely a whimper of resistance from Democrats.

Contrast that with California, where voters have given Democrats a new dominance that could allow them to raise taxes and embrace same-sex marriage without regard to Republican objections.

If you thought the presidential election revealed the nation's political rifts, consider the outcomes in state legislatures. The vote also created a broader tier of powerful one-party governments that can act with no need for compromise. Half of state legislatures now have veto-proof majorities, up from 13 only four years ago, according to figures compiled for The Associated Press by the National Conference of State Legislatures.

All but three states — Iowa, Kentucky and New Hampshire — have one-party control of their legislatures, the highest mark since 1928.

The result could lead to stark differences in how people live and work.

"Usually, a partisan tide helps the same party across the country, but what we saw in this past election was the opposite of that — some states getting bluer and some states getting redder," said Thad Kousser, an associate political science professor at the University of California-San Diego who focuses on state politics. As a result, "we'll see increasing policy divergence across the states."

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Ohio; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: ia; ky; mo; nh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last
To: qam1

Thanks for this thread.


41 posted on 11/20/2012 8:20:02 PM PST by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Those states need to band together. Time for Republicans to grow a spine and push back against the federal government.


42 posted on 11/20/2012 8:26:34 PM PST by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Sometimes I think we learn too much. It makes us ill-content. LOL


43 posted on 11/20/2012 8:30:55 PM PST by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: qam1
If they had a clue they would start bringing the 120% blue rat districts under control.

Time to stop giving the parasites a say in how much they get to loot.

44 posted on 11/20/2012 8:41:53 PM PST by hopespringseternal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Of course, the above does not take into account congressional districts which vote for congressmen and presidents of opposite parties.

There were a lot of them this election. That is why I asked. If presidential electors were selected in every state the way Maine and Nebraska do now, would it have changed the result this year? I honestly do not know, and your post doesn't answer it.

45 posted on 11/20/2012 8:53:59 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
The red states need to pass laws prohibiting the scum that flee the blue socialist states they’ve destroyed from voting in statewide elections for a period of ten years,

I don't know if you're joking, but that would be blatantly unconstitutional. As the Supreme Court has ruled, under the 14th Amendment, "citizens can pick their states, but states cannot pick their citizens."

46 posted on 11/20/2012 9:00:49 PM PST by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
As the Supreme Court has ruled, under the 14th Amendment, "citizens can pick their states, but states cannot pick their citizens."

Okay then, see post #39. States can certainly help people find (and move to) more accomodating states.

47 posted on 11/20/2012 9:39:20 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

bkmk


48 posted on 11/20/2012 9:41:25 PM PST by Jane Long (Philippians 2:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

The TN one actually.


49 posted on 11/20/2012 9:51:33 PM PST by Fledermaus (The Republic is Dead: Collapse the system. Let the Dems destroy the economy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation

Good


50 posted on 11/20/2012 9:54:23 PM PST by Fledermaus (The Republic is Dead: Collapse the system. Let the Dems destroy the economy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

bookmark


51 posted on 11/20/2012 9:56:09 PM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian
No, but it does tell you that there would have had to been a NET 281-268 = 13 net seats which would have had to have elected GOP congressman and still voted for Obama. Considering that is nearly double the number of house seats which flipped nationwide, I think it unlikely.

Dave Leip's presidential atlas might eventually post the district information. They have done so in the past.

52 posted on 11/21/2012 5:13:15 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Kolath
Pennsylvania had exactly such a bill introduced in our last session (2011) and a governor pledged to sign it. It was our Quisling state GOP chairman who strong-armed a handful of wavering GOP legislators into not even letting it come to the floor for debate on the grounds that it might diminish his influence in the national party. Selfish bastard.

Had BO been forced to compete for electoral votes in Pennsylvania from the get-go, they might not have had the resources to build the fraud machines in Ohio, Florida, Virginia and elsewhere.

Instead, they gave us a toothless voter ID law as a booby prize.

53 posted on 11/21/2012 5:19:51 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

can they reintroduce in 2013?


54 posted on 11/21/2012 7:29:04 AM PST by Kolath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

seems his influence got knocked down a peg...didn’t deliver the bacon (20evs)


55 posted on 11/21/2012 7:34:36 AM PST by Kolath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman; Lurking Libertarian; Kolath
Because the Congressional Districts are set by the state legislatures each decade - and because of the requirement, cheerfully followed by Republican state legislators, that blacks be concentrated in CDs which will elect black representatives, the CDs are gerrymandered in favor of the party controlling the legislature of each state.
This has the redeeming characteristic that, although the Senate no longer represents the state governments, the House of Representatives, to some extent, does. In a milieu in which the Republicans have been controlling the state legislatures, that would favor Republican presidential candidates if they enacted the per-CD rule for allocating electoral votes.
I’m sure the Democrats would be delighted to switch from the unit rule to the CD system if it favored them - and equally certain that they would cry “foul!” if they thought it favored the Republicans. They would really cry “Foul!” if the Republican legislatures appointed the Electors directly, or simply ruled the incumbent POTUS off the ballot - as the Constitution
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
certainly would seem to permit.

56 posted on 11/21/2012 8:58:29 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kolath
There would be nothing to stop them other than the fear of making the Democrats really, really mad or being called racists. I plan to contact my own representative and Senator Dominic Peliggi (who introduced it in the first place and was comfortably reelected) to do just that.

Governor's announced priorities are to fix the state's roads (which the Obama stimulus money was supposed to do) and privatize the state liquor stores. Gov. Corbett faces reelection in 2014.

57 posted on 11/21/2012 9:15:56 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: qam1

Judging from all the reports I have read it is much harder to make a case that the presidency was NOT stolen this time than to make the case that it WAS stolen. There will be many who voted for Romney who will never admit that it was stolen because they would rather blame the Romney campaign than face up to what has happened to this country but then some people will never admit that this is not still the same great country that used to make heroes of people like Roy Rogers, Gene Autry, John Wayne etc. and elected General Dwight David Eisenhower to the presidency twice. If someone like Ike were running today he would be made out to be an ogre that eats puppies and kittens for breakfast.


58 posted on 11/21/2012 2:01:28 PM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

If we could overturn the seventeenth AND the nineteenth and require that all persons voting must own property, pay taxes, speak English and be able to read, write and understand the constitution in English things would absolutely take a turn for the better, no doubt about it. It wouldn’t be a big deal whether they were actually citizens or not if they met the above qualifications.


59 posted on 11/21/2012 2:08:31 PM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Publius; lentulusgracchus

If Mr. Booke based the accent on Strom Thurmond it was not Georgia or South Alabama, Strom came from Edgefield, South Carolina. I am 68 and was born and raised here so I can attest that there used to be many, many different accents in this state. In fact it was forty years ago that I took a job based here where I am now, just fifty miles from the little farm where I grew up and when I first came here every time I opened my mouth someone would comment that I was obviously, “not from this part of the state.”
Fifty years ago a man from Orangeburg and a man from Spartanburg might have had a difficult time understanding each other. I can drive from the high school I attended to Lake City, SC in about two hours maximum but in 1960 a young teacher who grew up on a tobacco farm near Lake City and had just graduated from Clemson came to our school to teach vocational agriculture and we were amazed how different his accent was from ours. He told us that, “Peepal frum da lowa pot de ste-at tawk different.” Some of us used to read the State Newspaper which was published in Columbia but people in some parts of the state read, “Da Ste-at Peppa”.
I actually preferred it that way, now everyone is beginning to sound a lot more alike, I have a nephew age 26 who grew up at Fort Mill, SC which is close to Charlotte, NC, he sounds like a radio announcer in comparison to what I grew up hearing. I would like to hear just once more, “You set yoseff down rye cheer in da rockin’ cher an’ make yoseff at home.” I miss Ol’ Strohm and the way he used to say “hoose” instead of house.


60 posted on 11/21/2012 2:49:42 PM PST by RipSawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson