| Clay Matthews Illustrates RINO Joe Scarborough's Definition of Racism | |
| Non-Racist | Racist |
 |
 |
And in case anyone says the skin color card is worn out, it is NOT worn out. It is more effective than it ever was.
Joe, The Token White RINO
Mika has his brain in a Lock-Box
It’s like Mika said:
Once you get a RINO by his Pride And Joy, his heart and mind will follow.
Like Rush just said...this from the party that went out of their way to elect two white guys instead of one black woman (Mia Love) and a black man (Allen West).
They don’t care about race...it’s all about liberalism.
So long as obama is president, color is going to be the only thing that matters...in anything.
Politics is a rough business, and the only skin type that matters is the “thick” type.
If this woman, and her cohorts, can’t take the heat, they need to get out of the kitchen.
She wants all the rights and privilieges, but doesn’t want to suffer any of the slings and arrows...typical.
No matter what the facts, it will devolve into a rassiss homophobic argument anyway - a lesbian of color lying about the demise of a gay white ambassador. I guess we need to get used to it.
All I see is 4 dead Americans and a very obvious cover up. Dog whistles be damned.
I don’t care if she is orange...She is not qualified for SOS.
When the only tool you have is a hammer, all your problems look like nails.
Old white guys have three strikes against them:
1. They are old
2. They are white
3. They are guys
None of these are politically protected classes in 0bama’s Amerika.
Someone needs to start seriously investigating why Scarborough really left office.
Someone needs to start seriously investigating why Scarborough really left office.
The first thing they do is play the race card, no matter the person’s skin color. If they put up an Asian Communist to run instead of Obama, we all would’ve been racist against Asians for opposing the person, rather than black people.
First Law of Liberalism: If you aren’t a progressive secularist anything negative you say about either a progressive secularist or a progressive secularist idea is racist, sexist, or intolerant. This Law trumps all others.
Let’s Make a Deal!
Hey Morning Joe (and all the rest of the MSM), Republicans will give Susan Rice (The “Woman of Color”) a free pass just as soon as ALL of you are replaced by “Colored People” (is that the current PC term to cover “Women of Color”, “Men of Color” and “Confused as to their Gender Beings of Color”?)
You can staff Morning Joe with Cynthia McKinney, Cornel West, The Being Formerly Known as Prince, Al Sharpton, Jesse, whomever.
We don’t watch anyway.
| Clay Matthews Illustrates RINO Joe Scarborough's Definition of Racism | |
| Non-Racist | Racist |
|
|
Just federalizing what has been known in working level corporate America for decades. You can’t expect black employees at any level of private employment or government employment to have any work expectations to meet. If you do, then you are racist!
You are supposed to not hold them to any targets or expectations and then be ready to promote them on demand!
I think we need a new word to call “us” when we engage in sexism (criticizing a female) who happens to be black (racism).
How about “rexism” and “rexists”?
Is Scarecrow Joe still on TV?
Whatever Rice’s gender or color, she was a willing liar to the American people...and that is the issue, they want to ignore.
..... I think this incident could be used as a shining example of what is wrong with the GOP, Conservatives and anybody else out there complaining about the results of the last election. Case in point ..... observe who is talking about that statement made by the DNC Chair about the GOP: "...They Got Whiter and More Male..." Observe who is speaking out against that statement ..... Is it anybody in elected office .... Heck, except on very rare occasions, does anybody in elected office ever voice any displeasure about anything verbally puked out by the Dems? The answer is .... NO!
.... Unfortunately .... our elected officials seem to make a very concerted effort to only allow the conservative talking heads and talk show hosts portray any verbal defense or do any vocal dismay about anything said by the Liberals, Progressives aka Democrats. The problem with that is ..... the points of views put forth by the talk show hosts et al .... are for the most part preaching to the choir and not getting out into the public forum as well as it would if it was spoken on the House or Senate floors.
.... On the other side, the Dems always rally ALL of their machinery to do any vocal defense or displeasure .... including their elected officials. In fact 99% of the time they do this so efficiently by getting their talking points out almost immediately after an incident or event ... they seem to consistently have the ability to efficiently frame the argument and force the GOP on the defensive. And even then ..... the GOP elected officials refrain from making any comment and wait ..... and wait .... for the talking heads and talk show hosts to voice any conservative response. My guess is that they do this to see how the public reacts to the statements before they even squeak out an insipid statement. In short probably an effort to protect their crappy job instead of growing some brass ones and actually taking a stance on the floor of House or Senate or any place for that matter.
... IMO If the GOP ever hopes to regain anything and expect to ever re-educate the public about the constitution and the need for conservative principles... there will have to be a rapid response team set in motion to voice conservative talking points and principles to the public ears instead of only speaking to the choir members when relying only on the talking heads and talk show hosts.
On the other hand they perpetually remind minorities how good they have it, NOW.. and that they should hump the leg of every Liberal politician from now on ... performing this act with servile and dehumanizing adoration!!
The Liberals have had it both ways for so long that no one questions the glaring absence of logic in any of this!!
I guess if your constituency is THIS docile and easily led, you can get and keep their allegiance with completey dishonest, intellectual clap trap!