Breaking? Was there ever any doubt?
I have maintained since day one of this, and will continue to maintain until I’m proved wrong, that the whole Benghazi debacle was a coverup for something much, much larger and way more sinister. A blown coverup perhaps, but a coverup nonetheless.
Upchuck, you may be more right than me, but I honestly believe this boils down to something as simple as, “We shouldn’t jump to conclusions.” That’s the famous quote of Obama after the attack on Fort Hood.
He just doesn’t want to accept that the Islamic adherents don’t love us. He refuses to act in public like he thinks parts of Islam are rotten to the core. He is more loyal to them, and playing down their evil ways, than being loyal to the U. S., and recognizing the evil for what it is both personally, and publicly.
If you think in terms of the U. S. vs the U. S. S. R., a president more inclined to be sympathetic to the Soviet’s point of view, would have been considered unfit to hold the highest office in our nation.
Him being responsible for our armed forces in time of conflict, could cause doubts and an inability to respond to an attack in real time.
Bud, this is EXACTLY what took place at Benghazi. He blinked, while our people were slaughtered.
It probably wasn’t a high crime or misdemeanor, but his vacillating on this matter, resulted in unnecessary death. His loyalties are all screwed up.
To one degree or another, he’s on their side. He probably doesn’t agree with what they did here, but he does agree with their overall goals.
Knowing how he was raised, I don’t necessarily think it’s his fault that he respects Islam and Socialism more than he does Christianity and Capitalism.
It still makes him unfit to be our leader.
This is something our Congress better address before it costs us far more than it already has.
This my take on it.
IMPEACH OBAMA FOR COVER-UP:
1) 0bama’s failure to attend security briefings.
2) The draw-down of security at the Embassy PRIOR TO 9/11.
3) Ignoring pleas from Stevens for more security THE DAY OF THE ATTACK.
4) DENYING troops to rescue Americans in distress DURING THE ATTACK.
5) Was the 'Annex' a prison? 40 people at that location?
6) That Stevens or CIA was doing nefarious things; supplying weapons to terrorists, etc.
The COVER-UP started in the Rose Garden with 0bama's vague words, but became official when Susan Rice did a PROPAGANDA TOUR FOR THE PURPOSE OF DOWNPLAYING THE INCIDENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO COVER-UP FAILURES AND MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO OBAMA'S RE-ELECTION BID.
A COVER-UP TO SAVE HIS RE-ELECTION!!!
yep like why all this covert trickling out of weapons to Syria. Lets fake an attach and let the Jihads clean out the warehouse in one fell swoop
yep like why all this covert trickling out of weapons to Syria. Lets fake an attach and let the Jihads clean out the warehouse in one fell swoop
Precisely.
The coverup was for the CIA to gather weapons in Libya and send them to Syria.
I think it’s way more than that...
That annex was hugh ..
what were they doing there?
google..... was bengazi a torture facility ..
eyeopening
That’s my opinion too.