Cold Case Posse boss fingers Hawaii officials (Arpaio's deputy, Mike Zullo)

WND ^ | November 14, 2012 | Christopher Monckton of Brenchley

[Seizethecarp]

An angry statement just sworn by the lead investigator of a team assigned to review Barack Obama’s birth certificate says Hawaii officials – who are Democrats like Obama – are using “elaborate non-cooperation” to conceal birth records from law enforcement and the public.

Zullo, a seasoned sleuth who heads the team deputized by Joe Arpaio, recently re-elected sheriff of Maricopa County, Ariz., fingers Hawaii’s governor, deputy attorney general and health department chiefs as obstructing justice.

Zullo’s affidavit charges these officials are “hiding” original birth records, thwarting the posse’s hunt for those who forged the document at the White House website.

His detailed catalog of Hawaii’s misfeasance is shocking.

The department, Zullo said, “has engaged in what the sheriff’s investigators believe is a systematic effort to hide from law enforcement and the public whatever original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health may have in its possession.”

Officials “changed their policies and procedures in a manner calculated to hinder our law-enforcement investigation,” he continued.

[Brown Deer]

https://www.duedil.com/director/903023487/valerie-zelpha-helen-sarruf

[PA-RIVER]

Seems this will not end until we get Hawaii to open the vault.

Maybe we could open a thread to brain storm on how to get Virginia Sunaharas records? Maybe it will be easier to get her records? Maybe someone could write a check to Viginia and then give it to her brothers hands? With stipulation that he is inheriting the money from her, and only if he can show her BC and his. This way he has a clear need to see it, and prove her birth. To prove he is related to her, and has access to her records, as a right of a relative. Maybe insurance benefit or property to inherit on mainland that requires her original copy of her BC.

[Seizethecarp]

It is good to toss these ideas around, but HI has that annoying language at the bottom of the short form stating that this form is legal proof of HI birth in any legal proceeding, or some such, IIRC.

[Candor7]

I’m wondering now if it bothers you that he’s with a young woman who is very obviously a white girl.>>>>>>>>>>>>

No, I have in my time many inter-racial liasons.I have no
issues with that aspect, LOL.MX hated Whites, and also was a foolower of the racial supremacy of the black race over all others, ie. a black power nationalist just like Obama , and Robert Mugabe.Their socialist aspects make them fall into the fascist category, enemies of feedom. I do not trust them or their adherents and supporters, Obama is one, so was Malcolm X. I lived for a time among US Black Supremiists in Africa, on a research project in 1970.

The subject photo just is not technically right. I have no idea why it was altered.Maybe it was done just to make the group look cool at Oxford.

He said, when speaking of the Bandung Conference attendees in Indonesia in 1955, that there were no white people at the conference.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

The Obama Campaign regularly held fund raising dinners in 2007 where no white reporters or attendees were allowed.Yet no body said a thing.Fascists.

I am well acquainted with the Mufti, founder of the movement now known around the world as the Muslim Brotherhood opf Islamofascism, and Hamas.

The black supremacy war has been waged ever since the weathermen etc. on America.Its a secret war.

[Fred Nerks]

...The subject photo just is not technically right. I have no idea why it was altered.Maybe it was done just to make the group look cool at Oxford.

The subject photograph was taken after the speech he made at the Oxford Union, there's no doubt that both he and Abrahams were there. The subject photograph was evidently taken at Oxford. There's no need that I can see to make them 'look cool' - you've seen the video and the official photograph of the participants. So you need to say just exactly WHAT about that image seems fake to you?

Are you suggesting that some of the people in that group don't belong there? Or that the entire group was transplanted from elsewhere and the Oxford surrounds are a false backdrop? When you say an image is a fake, there has to be a reason or a context. You can't just say ' it looks fake to me' without explaining WHY.

[Fred Nerks]

Update on New Lawsuit Filed Against Hawaii Department of Health on Behalf of Virginia Sunahara’s Brother, Duncan Sunahara

http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com.au/2012/01/update-on-lawsuit-filed-against-hawaii.html

[Candor7]

You can’t just say ‘ it looks fake to me’ without explaining WHY.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

I did explain what I thought wrong with the photo, LOL, but in another thread, my fault you did not read it:

******************************************

Cold Case Posse boss fingers Hawaii officials (Arpaio’s deputy, Mike Zullo)
November 19, 2012 10:11:31 AM · 83 of 106
Candor7 to Fred Nerks
Look at the light on the hair of Malcom x and the hair of the woman he is next to, then look at the light on the two men stage left and right.Compare that difference in terms of lighht shgining on their heads. This can’t be a genuine photo, whether authenticated or not.If you look at the photo immediately preceding that one at the getty site, you will see a more pronounced difference.Tghe background has an entorely differnet light source as well, so much so that it looks like a painted on stage set.

The leftist black power nationalists have been up to this for years. The original image may have been authenticated, but this one is not, the background and the figures are from different photos IMHO. The figures are cut outs.

BTW, I love your photos, but this one is surreal.

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies

[Fred Nerks]

I did read that comment, it's what I have been replying to, you appear to be saying that the people in the image were NOT there, you say they look like cut-outs. In other words, you seem to be suggesting that MX was not at Oxford, and 'they' mysteriously had to place him there. Sorry, it just doesn't make sense. Here's a link to a website that shows the same image with the copyright stamp removed:

LINK

If he was never at Oxford and it it wasn't so well recorded that he was, THEN I might think it's possible he and his companions were super-imposed onto a false background. But he was there, and that he was hosted by Abrahams is indisputably recorded. So I just to not see the point.

[Candor7]

No Fred, I am not saying that X was not at Oxford. I am saying that the photo was altered.The people in the photo look cut out from another photo and inserted in front of that building.I do not know why it was done.Maybe some others were cut out of the photo, its passingly strange, thats all.

[Fred Nerks]

So you are saying that the people you see have been placed in front of that Oxford Union Building after one or more ‘other’ people were removed from the image? Is that what you mean?

[Fred Nerks]

I'm really tired of it all, sometimes a photograph is just a photograph. He was there, so was Abrahams, and he quoted from Hamlet during the speech - so having a Shakespeare actress with him isn't a huge leap. She's the same girl who played Anna Rosas in the 1962 episode of The Avengers.

IMAGE

[Candor7]

So you are saying that the people you see have been placed in front of that Oxford Union Building after one or more ‘other’ people were removed from the image? Is that what you mean?>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

That could be it. Or for whatever reason. I do know that those people have different light exposure on their heads and faces than the buildings do, I can only surmise why it would be as it is. There may have been one or more persons with them in the original photo who they might not want to have a record about.

[ABrit]

That “Gotcha” moment. Seeing those pics lined up. Well done.

[ABrit]

But...the Anna Rosas seem to have had the nose and lips altered. They are a different shape and colour? Anna Rosas pictured has more of a Michael Jackson nose, and bee stung lips.

[Fred Nerks]

The photographs are more than two years apart, she’s wearing a wig and TV make-up in one and not in the other.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4ixnuPd1AAw

Appears towards the end in the above episode.

http://theavengers.tv/forever/gale1-13.htm

See CAST

http://adf.ly/1419348/banner/http://www.dissolute.com.au/avweb/season2/213cast.html

Click on the name Anna Rosas and her photograph comes up.

It really isn’t such a huge secret, the information and images are available to anyone who cares to GOOGLE. I’m weary of the subject, every time I bring it up I’m treated like I have a communicable disease or something.

[Candor7]

I watched that video, having seen it before many years ago. It struck me that Malcolm X’s appeal in the debate was one of emotion rather than logic, buoyed by his charismatic speaking style.

Yes he may have been correct in many ways concerning his ionterpretation of history, but his manner of altering history, the view that his contemporary white colleagues are without question responsible for the deeds of racial segregation of their forefathers is just plain fascist.
If one is white, regardless of ones actions, heart , or miond, one ios still guilty of the sin of racism.That itslef is racism.

I discard X, all his running dogs and the black power nationalist movement. They are essentially black power nationalists who tourt a socialist remedy of the redistribution of wealth based upon historical responsibility of the modern innocents for the guilty
of the past.If Obama and his minions sharing this view are indeed serious, then they will eventually face the gun.
And all this is now coming to a head in America with barely 20 per cent of our population aware of what this means for the future?

This is what that video reoresents to me, the wages of fascism.

[Fred Nerks]

He was planning to be the big man and take the United States to task at the United Nations to demand reparations. That was after hob-nobbing with the Mufti of Jerusalem who was actively involved in the design of the crematoriums at Auschwitz, who met with the leader of the PLO (before Arafat) and of whom the FBI said, when he met with Nasser, that he had now become more dangerous than ever.
His function, after the brief he received from Prince Feisal and his conversion to sunni islam, was to build mosques all over the US and convert the blacks, many of whom belonged to The Nation of Islam, to ‘true’ islam, and by that is meant the wahabbe version - to follow the straight path of mohammad, live by the koran and implement sharia.
His instruction at the al-Azhar university/mosque was apparently undertaken over a period of 18 weeks in 1963-64 and the FBI had no idea what he was up to while he was out of the country, they only observed his departures and arrivals to and from the US. The man is called a civil-rights-activist, but he probably spent more time in the middle east than he did at home.
His daughter recently said that obama is a COMMUNITY ORGANIZER ON A WORLD SCALE just like her father was.

Time Magazine, in 1965, ran an article (now pay to view) which described him as THE GREATEST DISASTER TO RACE RELATIONS IN THE HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES.

And I gather she knows who her half brother in the White House is.

[ABrit]

Don’t take it that way Fred, it was just an observation on the image. I believe they are of the same person, and thanks for all you efforts. I hope you and your colleagues will get proper recognition soon.

[Fred Nerks]

OKAY...and thank you. It’s not recognition we wanted, we just wanted to be able to share the results of our research on FR, and maybe get a little co-operation into the bargain.

[little jeremiah]

Placemark.