The subject photograph was taken after the speech he made at the Oxford Union, there's no doubt that both he and Abrahams were there. The subject photograph was evidently taken at Oxford. There's no need that I can see to make them 'look cool' - you've seen the video and the official photograph of the participants. So you need to say just exactly WHAT about that image seems fake to you?
Are you suggesting that some of the people in that group don't belong there? Or that the entire group was transplanted from elsewhere and the Oxford surrounds are a false backdrop? When you say an image is a fake, there has to be a reason or a context. You can't just say ' it looks fake to me' without explaining WHY.
You can’t just say ‘ it looks fake to me’ without explaining WHY.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I did explain what I thought wrong with the photo, LOL, but in another thread, my fault you did not read it:
******************************************
Cold Case Posse boss fingers Hawaii officials (Arpaio’s deputy, Mike Zullo)
November 19, 2012 10:11:31 AM · 83 of 106
Candor7 to Fred Nerks
Look at the light on the hair of Malcom x and the hair of the woman he is next to, then look at the light on the two men stage left and right.Compare that difference in terms of lighht shgining on their heads. This can’t be a genuine photo, whether authenticated or not.If you look at the photo immediately preceding that one at the getty site, you will see a more pronounced difference.Tghe background has an entorely differnet light source as well, so much so that it looks like a painted on stage set.
The leftist black power nationalists have been up to this for years. The original image may have been authenticated, but this one is not, the background and the figures are from different photos IMHO. The figures are cut outs.
BTW, I love your photos, but this one is surreal.
Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies