“Walked in and set fire to it”? They were described in the first reports as having bombed it to break down the wall before they could even get in.
His report makes it sound like they were just strolling around with a book of matches and decided to “set fire to it” as a kind of prank.
And Petraeus doesn’t know “which government agency and when” removed any reference to terrorism?
Petraeus is still covering for Obama. Too bad, he could have redeemed himself.
Petraeus: water is wet.
When are people going to reveal the truth about the Benghazi attack. It wasn’t terrorism, it was, “workplace violence.”
Remember...
Obama went crazy....I called it terrorism....Hey girl....check the transcript...It's right here Mr. President.......you sure did call it a terrorist attack...
There was no surprise about the attack. There was no 'failure of intel.' The attack was predicted in precise detail a month before it occurred. The draw down of security had to be intentional.
CIA Sources: Obama ordered military not to help Ambassador Stevens
The failure to approve a rescue had to be intentional.
Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
Keeping the Counterterrorism Security Group (CSG) in the dark about the attack had to be intentional.
Tweeting apologies for the 'anti-Muhammed video' beginning early that morning, repeatedly blaming all the violence at all of our embassies on the 'video' and making an apology video to air in Pakistan had to be intentional.
Stevens presence in Benghazi on 9-11 had to be intentional.
Sorry General...we already knew all of that.
A group of people with automatic weapons ATTACKED the consulate and came in through a hole in the wall they had blown in it the month before.
The State Department, yourself, the Pentagon, and the White House knew all about that and denied requests for more security.
So, please...get on with the program.
WHO TOLD RICE TO GO OUT AND LIE?
Since yourself, Clinton and the President all partroted that same lie, it is pretty clear that either the President instructed everyone to get that story straight, or you all agreed to it jointly. Which was it?
WALKING AL QUIDA IN BENGHAZI
http://www.jeffhead.com/walkingalquida.htm
He was not under oath for a second time. So we got some truth and some bs.
Petraeus and obama are dance partners in this. They are smacking the ball around to keep attention from where it should be.
Did Hillary or Obama send him there???
Dammit!! Who was holding Mitch Rapp back?
I’m interested which path Petraeus is going to take with this. Does he throw obama and his cohorts to the wolves at his own expense? Or does he sell out to obama to get a way out? I guess it depends on which circles he was running in to begin with. Options, always options.
no doubt at this local. Lax Security was preplanned. That is a fact and in the paper trail.
That’s what I do whenever I see a bunch of young men armed with automatic rifles and Rocket Propelled Grenades and fuel cans walking towards my front door.
“Honey! The neighbors are throwing us a weenie roast! You break out the Oscar Meyers and I’ll get the checker board!”