Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time To Make Paul Ryan Speaker of the House
11/7/12 | Armybratproud

Posted on 11/07/2012 11:48:32 AM PST by ArmyBratproud

With concern that the current Speaker of the House will cave on issues such as the debt limit, it is time to make Paul Ryan Speaker of the House. Please contact your U.S. Representative.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 113th; paulryan; speaker
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last
To: ArmyBratproud

if I was in there, he’d have my vote


21 posted on 11/07/2012 12:01:37 PM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

After the march on Washington D.C. and the 2010 elections......The mandate was given to the ‘Republicans’——FIGHT G DAMN YOU!!!

Boner played with himself and appeased Obama. This is the main reason Repubican voters were not that enthusiastic this election. Kick that cry baby alcoholic out of the speaker’s seat.


22 posted on 11/07/2012 12:03:04 PM PST by Electric Graffiti (Sterilize Obama voters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Huh? Ryan polls quite well and is in no way tainted. His solutions are not unpopular, and in fact are the signature legislation of the House majority that just got overwhelmingly returned to Washington.

In fact, I guarantee you see Obama latch on to parts of his budget by spring to show his compromising abilities.


23 posted on 11/07/2012 12:03:04 PM PST by ilgipper (Obama supporters are comprised of the uninformed & the ill-informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: morphing libertarian

yes, he did.

by the way, libertarian candidates managed to get democrats elected last night in key races by cutting the vote against republicans.

time for them to take their blame.


24 posted on 11/07/2012 12:03:04 PM PST by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Absolutely....


25 posted on 11/07/2012 12:04:57 PM PST by Vendome (Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

Let the other side define us. Conservativism = cold-hearted and evil.


26 posted on 11/07/2012 12:05:09 PM PST by all the best (`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: convertedtoreason

ranting made up nonsense that in no way is related to any facts does not fool folks.

Ryan is a conservative.


27 posted on 11/07/2012 12:05:29 PM PST by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: convertedtoreason

ranting made up nonsense that in no way is related to any facts does not fool folks.

Ryan is a conservative.


28 posted on 11/07/2012 12:05:50 PM PST by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN
Get people back to work, you have a lot more money for entitlements even as you have less demand for entitlements.

What? You just stated the the liberal platform. How are we supposed to get people back to work if they are comfortable with their entitlements? You can't just keep spending money (on top of not bringing in enough to match) and expect things to get better.

29 posted on 11/07/2012 12:07:57 PM PST by justice14 ("stand up defend or lay down and die")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
Hugh Hewitt was interviewing Rep. John Campbell last night after Obama won and the subject of Paul Ryan as House Speaker came up...Campbell would not rule out the possibility.

My choice is Allen West...but no matter, Boehner must go.

30 posted on 11/07/2012 12:09:41 PM PST by Tex-Con-Man (<-------currently working through post-election anger issues.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon

For him to run for the job, the R members would need to hear from their voters. When they get enough calls with the idea, they go to Ryan (Mainly because he is a star and they want to be around a star) and they mention to he an others that folks are pushing the idea. That’s how the seed gets planted in Washington. Is also wakes up the current Speaker and forces his hand.

And before someone calls this idea of movement dubious, realize that this is how some things work on the Hill. By the way, Dirty Harry is talking about changing filibuster rools in the Senate (according to Fox News). So anything that causes a stir and at least wakes up the current Speaker...well, I’ll try anything at this point.


31 posted on 11/07/2012 12:13:04 PM PST by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon

For him to run for the job, the R members would need to hear from their voters. When they get enough calls with the idea, they go to Ryan (Mainly because he is a star and they want to be around a star) and they mention to he an others that folks are pushing the idea. That’s how the seed gets planted in Washington. Is also wakes up the current Speaker and forces his hand.

And before someone calls this idea of movement dubious, realize that this is how some things work on the Hill. By the way, Dirty Harry is talking about changing filibuster rools in the Senate (according to Fox News). So anything that causes a stir and at least wakes up the current Speaker...well, I’ll try anything at this point.


32 posted on 11/07/2012 12:13:37 PM PST by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

well, you can sit around and whine and do nothing like too many on FR have come to do over the recent years.

I remember a time when folks on FR had a pair and would get in the active fight. I remember when we took on Dan Rathers.

Just being critics equates to doing nothing. Licking wounds aint my game. Only blood I want to taste is that of the opponent.


33 posted on 11/07/2012 12:17:53 PM PST by ArmyBratproud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Comment #34 Removed by Moderator

To: ArmyBratproud

I expect as much, but I think in the big picture they’re still a drop in the bucket. I left because I don’t see how you can support the choice of abortion (what about the kid’s rights?)or open border or a nuclear weapon in the hands of fanatics.

However, I don’t find much solace in the GOP. I would put money and time behind an effort to make the GOP a third party and have an emerging conservative party.

I’m 66 and riding into the sunset with several illnesses. So someone lead and I’ll follow.


35 posted on 11/07/2012 12:18:38 PM PST by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

Many of us may not like Boehner, but he has basically flown under the radar. It may be one of the reasons why the House majority was basically untouched, even though the GOP was being pummeled everywhere else.

A high profile Speaker is risky (as we saw with Gingrich).


36 posted on 11/07/2012 12:21:10 PM PST by Arthurio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud

you can pretend that libertarians are really Republicans if you want, but they’re not. most of them, if they didn’t vote for each other, would vote for a democrat


37 posted on 11/07/2012 12:29:39 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

Allen West comes to mind


38 posted on 11/07/2012 12:31:21 PM PST by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ArmyBratproud
i was opposing Preibus way back when he was first proposed as RNC chairman.

These Wisconsin guys are probably Conservative by the local standards, but not in reality.

39 posted on 11/07/2012 12:32:33 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: justice14
"How are we supposed to get people back to work if they are comfortable with their entitlements?"

They aren't comfortable with their entitlements. They want jobs, but we lowered our import tariffs and outsourced the jobs to China and other countries.

"You can't just keep spending money (on top of not bringing in enough to match) and expect things to get better."

No you can't. But the correct way to fix this is not cut out the safety nets and hope people find jobs that they couldn't find before. The right way is to create the conditions for the jobs to return to America which means restoring the protective tariffs that our founders put in place. Put Americans working for Americans instead of Chinese working for Americans and people won't be clinging to those safety nets any more.

That's not the liberal position. The liberal position is to supply the safety nets and do nothing to get the jobs back.

That's not Romney's position. Romney's position was to cut the safety nets and do nothing to get the jobs back. And to enter more free trade agreements which will outsource even more jobs.

That's DannyTN's position and it ought to be yours!!!

40 posted on 11/07/2012 12:37:15 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson