Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Pennsylvania Blunder
Dick Morris.com ^ | November 2,2012 | Dick Morris

Posted on 11/02/2012 6:29:11 AM PDT by Hojczyk

Obama took care to irradiate the swing states with his negative attacks on Romney. When the voters in those states saw that Mitt was not a Halloween monster but a pretty nice and reasonable guy, his negative stopped working and the states started falling to Romney.

But in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan, the negatives on Romney never ran. The only Romney they saw in these states was the very presentable and attractive one who showed up in the debates. So there was no obstacle to hold them back from voting for Mitt.

Obama’s static dependence on the swing states to constitute a firewall backfired. The firewall became like the French Maginot Line of 1940, easily outflanked. When Romney began to buy ads in the semi-swing states, Obama was slow to respond. I nitially, his campaign dismissed Romney’s ads in Pennsylvania as a bluff intended to draw Obama’s resources away from Ohio. But it was no bluff. Romney’s people realized that 20 votes in Pennsylvania were as good as 18 in Ohio.

And, in this final week, Romney’s campaign and its allied groups are spending $11 million on Pennsylvania ads as opposed to only $2 million for Obama.

(Excerpt) Read more at dickmorris.com ...


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Michigan; US: Minnesota; US: Ohio; US: Pennsylvania; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: michigan; minnesota; ohio; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: HamiltonJay

Regarding your last paragraph, this is exactly what happened with the Dixiecrats in the 1960s and was supposed to happen with the Reagan Democrats in the 1980s, but didn’t.

The future demographic realignment will happen along racial and ethnic lines. I expect that Texas and Arizona will be back in the D column within 20 years given the growth of the Hispanic communities there and their now solidifying alignment with the Democrats. Unless by some chance a Republican comes along and shows them the way to Conservatism and away from the identity politics demagaugery the Dems have been seeding them with.


21 posted on 11/02/2012 7:52:15 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Pennsylvania is the only state that could actually switch because of Hurricane Sandy.

New York and New Jersey were always going to vote for Obama. There has never been any question. How many votes Obama wins these states really makes no difference.

Pennsylvania, however, is close enough to swing. The Philadelphia area that was hardest hit by Sandy is a Democrat stronghold in the state. I can easily see Democrat voters who were never that fired up about voting for Obama anyway not taking the time to vote when they are more concerned about buying food, water and gasoline and cleaning up storm damage.


22 posted on 11/02/2012 8:04:43 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (Are we nearing the end of the Obamanation?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
Not only is it old, it's completely irrelevant to the man's political analysis.

Regardless of his toe-sucking past, Morris is more often wrong than right when predicting election results. I don't necessarily discount anything he says, but I don't give it much weight either.

23 posted on 11/02/2012 8:08:23 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (Are we nearing the end of the Obamanation?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter
The future demographic realignment will happen along racial and ethnic lines. I expect that Texas and Arizona will be back in the D column within 20 years given the growth of the Hispanic communities there and their now solidifying alignment with the Democrats.

I am very afraid that you are right. Although most Hispanics that I know are far more socially and economically conservative than most Democrats, they still seem to be lining up to join the Democrat plantation.

24 posted on 11/02/2012 8:11:53 AM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (Are we nearing the end of the Obamanation?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

I don’t watch regular TV. I have ROKU attached to my TV and spend all my time watching steaming movies and TV shows... without commercials...smile


25 posted on 11/02/2012 8:20:43 AM PDT by PaulZe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: PaulZe
I have ROKU attached to my TV and spend all my time watching steaming movies and TV shows... without commercials...smile

Nice. I do too, mostly, Netflix for old stuff and DVR for the new (skipping commercials, of course). I refuse to pay for Hulu Plus because if I pay money for something that's free online I want no ads; they aren't playing along. Oh well, that's what DVRs are for. Of course news and sports have be live, and that's where I see commercials.

We recently got HBO and I discovered the HBO Go app, every original show HBO ever aired all free to stream if you subscribe to their channel. Wow, catching up on The Wire and The Sopranos alone will take months.

26 posted on 11/02/2012 8:33:57 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeWarrior

I’m in the same general area and can confirm. In fact, I don’t recall a recent election that had more republican signs, not McCain and not Bush.

I think PA. 2012 will look a lot like the Pennsylvania of 2010, not 2008.


27 posted on 11/02/2012 9:14:28 AM PDT by SueRae (See it? Hell, I can TASTE November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
At least he paid in full.

-PJ

28 posted on 11/02/2012 9:18:34 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Hojczyk.
Obama took care to irradiate the swing states with his negative attacks on Romney. When the voters in those states saw that Mitt was not a Halloween monster but a pretty nice and reasonable guy, his negative stopped working and the states started falling to Romney. But in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Michigan, the negatives on Romney never ran. The only Romney they saw in these states was the very presentable and attractive one who showed up in the debates... When Romney began to buy ads in the semi-swing states, Obama was slow to respond. Initially, his campaign dismissed Romney's ads in Pennsylvania as a bluff intended to draw Obama's resources away from Ohio... And, in this final week, Romney's campaign and its allied groups are spending $11 million on Pennsylvania ads as opposed to only $2 million for Obama.
Obama would wrap this campaign up if he'd just remind Pennsylvania voters of his war on coal. Whoops! Or the New Black Panthers. Whoops!


29 posted on 11/02/2012 9:01:31 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson