Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/30/2012 10:56:30 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem

...he called it in, and hoped no one noticed


2 posted on 10/30/2012 10:58:21 AM PDT by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

” The first statements from the Obama administration about what happened in Benghazi seemed plausible. “

Uh, not so much.


3 posted on 10/30/2012 10:58:32 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker ((God, family, country, mom, apple pie, the girl next door and a Ford F250 to pull my boat.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

OK. For the sake of argument, let’s say we couldn’t get the military there in time to stop the killing. Aren’t those facilities in Benghazi considered to be “American soil”? Shouldn’t we have sent in the tanks to secure it anyway? Why not?


4 posted on 10/30/2012 11:07:20 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Too bad somebody didn't show ∅ this excerpt from the U.S. Army Ranger creed when he got word of the attack:

I will never leave a fallen comrade to fall into the hands of the enemy and under no circumstances will I ever embarrass my country.

5 posted on 10/30/2012 11:14:39 AM PDT by QT3.14 (November 6: Remember BENGHAZI!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
unless restrained by incompetent civilian authority

Is it incompetent? It seemed fully competent. A month and a half out from an election due to remove you from power and you have an extremely embarrassing incident that could reveal many unpleasant facts, so you write off everyone involved and then stonewall. Very competent.

6 posted on 10/30/2012 11:21:02 AM PDT by throwback (The object of opening the mind, is as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

At some point the bastards responsible for this are going to have to admit to one of two things: politicization of their response (which is undoubtedly the true state of affairs) or gross incompetence. They’ll probably choose the latter, because it’s the lesser of two evils.


7 posted on 10/30/2012 11:22:27 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Once again it's all very simple.

WHO issued the ORDER to "STAND DOWN"... not once but supposedly TWICE.

Answer that question and you at the CORE of the entire issue.

9 posted on 10/30/2012 11:29:04 AM PDT by VideoDoctor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; All
In the Washington Times - we need to get this out - disseminate it!

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/oct/22/the-real-reason-behind-benghazigate/#ixzz2Aico0kxC

headline: “The real reason behind Benghazigate

Was Obama gun-walking arms to jihadists?”

'bummer 'job description" "reestablish the Caliphate" with the promise he'd be established as the new Mahdi?

10 posted on 10/30/2012 11:31:21 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

This General announced he was NOT going to stand down - he was releived of duty within 30 seconds (And another officer - Naval - SAME THING. This refutes any claim by bozo that he ordered help -

post this everywhere - email to everyone and tell them to do the same

http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/one-man-tried-to-save-benhgazi-lives-and-was-relieved-of-duty-within-30-seconds/question-3281377/

headline: “One Man Tried to Save Benhgazi Lives and was relieved of Duty within 30 seconds”


12 posted on 10/30/2012 12:12:59 PM PDT by maine-iac7 (Christian is as Christian does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

Here’s an interesting read for you, neverdem;

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/print-friendly/50586?fb_action_ids=513097095370227&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=aggregation&fb_aggregation_id=288381481237582


13 posted on 10/30/2012 12:25:55 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem

“— unless restrained by incompetent civilian authority.”

Incompetent? ....cowardly? ....or traitorous? Hmmmmm?


14 posted on 10/30/2012 12:54:23 PM PDT by Tucker39
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; All
This segment on Hannity last might made me cry. Please share with others. Thanks!

Powerful Hannity Show - 10/29/12 - Father of SEAL Ty Woods killed in Libya demands truth from WH

18 posted on 10/30/2012 2:17:45 PM PDT by Larousse2 (The price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: wardaddy; Joe Brower; Cannoneer No. 4; Criminal Number 18F; Dan from Michigan; Eaker; Jeff Head; ...
Barack Obama: What Could Have Been

Fifth Circuit Upholds Ban on Gun Sales to People Under 21

Obama's sequester proposal slashes funds for FEMA, disaster relief

Do "Get Out the Republican/Conservative Vote" Calls for Romney from the Comfort of Home!

Some noteworthy articles about politics, foreign or military affairs, IMHO, FReepmail me if you want on or off my list.

22 posted on 10/30/2012 4:43:26 PM PDT by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem
Woods and others disobeyed orders and headed over to the consulate, where they rescued several people and carried away the body of Sean Smith. They did not find the ambassador. Upon returning to the safe house, they again requested military back-up and were again denied. They were soon under fire. The fighting there went on for four more hours.

And still the MSM ignores this story...

23 posted on 10/30/2012 8:53:50 PM PDT by GOPJ ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbOuxqK2T34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: neverdem; stevie_d_64
[Article, quoting Leon Panetta]
"And as a result of not having that kind of information, the commander who was on the ground in that area, General Ham, General Dempsey and I felt very strongly that we could not put forces at risk in that situation."

Oh, so it's just the three of you and the President?

Gen. Dempsey is Chairman of the JCS -- which means he's not in the chain of command, he's the President's staff man, serving at the pleasure of the president just like you, Leon. Major General Carter Ham is an area commander who gets his troops (if any) from other regional commanders -- and as a major-general, he's about five layers down in the chain of command.

So we had you, Panetta (the President's SecDef and a career henchman), Gen. Dempsey (the President's general), and a junior general officer who "owns" Libya but no troops -- and you fired him on the spot for trying to help those people in Benghazi.

Where's the Army Chief of Staff? Where's the Secretary of the Army? All hell's breaking loose late in the evening in Libya (it's lunchtime in America), and you can't find people to get a second opinion? How cozy. Just like that Sunday in December, 1941, when George Marshall was out riding his horse.

Yeah, you and Barky had it down to a small group, didn't you? -- the way crap always happens.

24 posted on 10/31/2012 7:11:55 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson