Posted on 10/27/2012 2:33:28 AM PDT by Kaslin
Soon will come the finger-pointing.
Liberals will gnash their teeth, pull their hair and recriminate.
Yes; true, this is normal behavior on the part of liberals. But this time the behavior will be uproarious and hilarious.
Because this time, the folks who brought us Occupy Wall Street won’t be in a drum circle, but in a circular firing squad facing their comrades, their righteous fingers loaded and looking for blame.
“Oh, Chicago!” they’ll say. “Bang, bang.”
Sure, there will be the typical liberal shots at the “racists” on the right who denied Obama a second term.
But the delicious irony lost on them will be found in their final chant of “It’s all Bush’s fault.” But that irony won’t be lost on history.
Count me amongst those laughing hardest.
Because Obama’s term can best be described as a Harold Ramis movie.
Remember when Obama had to redefine his stimulus program that was supposed to create millions of jobs, to only “saving” millions of government jobs?
“We spent a trillion dollars on what?” Ha, ha.
As Jimmy Kimmel explained at the 2012 White House Correspondents Dinner:
“Mr. President, remember when the country rallied around you in the hopes of a better tomorrow? That was hilarious. That was your best one yet.”
Well not quite.
There was that time that Obama got roughly $90 billion for green energy jobs, or green energy “investments,” as he calls them, which were touted to save us billions of dollars in imported oil and create 5 million green energy jobs.
“The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 set aside $90 billion in renewable energy grants and loans for a grab bag of thousands of projects—wind farms, solar installations, natural gas fueling stations, biofuel research, and a $5 billion weatherization project for low-income homes,” reports BusinessWeek.com. “Digging into the public records of the $21 billion spent so far through 19 U.S. Department of Energy programs reveals 3,960 projects that employ 28,854 people.”
Only 4,971,146 jobs left to go!
Four more years? No, at that rate it would take 693 years for Obama to create 5 million green energy jobs at the rate he created them over the first four years. And at the current cost, Obama would have to spend $3.6 trillion just to create those jobs.
That’s 25 percent of our GDP dedicated to creating about 3.5 percent of our jobs, if it ever happened.
You can not find a better punch line that knocks the water out of Obamanomics so completely. Forget about Obama’s 1 percent. At $727,000 per job, the 3.5 percent who would have green jobs would have it pretty good.
Thankfully economics, and by that I mean real-life market forces, not wishful theories by central bank and Ivy League economists, have prevented Obamanomics from working.
So as a healthy alternative to providing actual money to families during the recession, Obama created the bumper sticker war that liberals call: The Republican War on Women (R-WoW).
R-WoW’s not doing so hot though. It’s based on the faulty assumption that Republican men want to control women’s brains and their uteruses. And it's way too transparent an attempt to distract from Obama's record of failure.
I’ll admit that as a man I don’t always understand women. They are girly and often smell powdery. That and the insides of their purses intimidate me. But I know that they have a healthy respect for money. This I understand.
If you gave them a choice between a job that pays money and free birth control, the ones I know would pick a job.
They aren’t buying into the R-WoW credo that the GOP is somehow hostile to women. And it’s not just the girls I know. According to the latest AP survey the vaunted gender gap that Obama counted on to get re-elected has disappeared. The seven-point advantage that Obama had with women in 2008 has vaporized in 2012.
“Less than two weeks out from Election Day,” reports CBSNews “Republican Mitt Romney has erased President Obama's 16-point advantage among women, a new Associated Press-GfK poll shows.”
Just a month ago, says CBS, “women favored Mr. Obama over Romney on the economy 56 percent to 40 percent. Now, the split has shifted to 49 percent for Romney and 45 percent for Mr. Obama.”
And the irony here is that the harder the administration tried to push R-WoW, the more they alienated women. It was just about a month ago that Obama’s disastrous debate performance forced liberals to cue up the War on Women once more as an alternative to…policy, results, progress, or a real president?
And yes, I find the irony of this hilarious.
Obama has been done in by his own campaign device, done in by women who wouldn't buy his R-WoW BS. Ha! It could all make a wonderful Will Farrell comedy. Women, however, it seems, are not amused.
The “use” factor, much like the blacks have been used willingly for decades by the democrate party for Taxpayer candy hand outs by the fed
That clip(s) of Will Farrell was dead-on satire and hilarious.
That's because the Dems are trotting out a a bizarre parade of gutter sluts. My college daughters are not amused.
The Democrats have painted women as NOTHING MORE THAN BABY KILLERS LUSTING FOR MORE DEAD BABIES!! Oh and FREE SEX SLUTS!!
Deep down, that’s how Dems really see women.
It’s not even deep down....it’s right on the surface....witness the slobbering all over the SLUT, Sandra FLUKE!!!
“Lady Parts” “First Time” “Family Planning [aka abortion]”
“$3K/month reproductive needs costs”...and so on.
One might get the impression that all women are interested in (and therefore worth) is sex and its consequences..
If I were a woman, I’d be miffed too.
And once again, Rush was right!
Indeed. However, liberals don't often get asked that question by an even more liberal media.
No kidding. I really am Shocked at how the DEMS view women.....I’ll repeat......BABY KILLERS LUSTING FORMORE DEAD BABIES and FREE SEX SLUTS!!! ANd LIBERAL WOMEN seem to be HAPPY with this!!!!
I live with three women. None of them are a bit amused.
Not even mildly amused.
Abortion, birth control, lady parts and voter virginity?
It’s insulting.
That’s what happens when you’re a misogynist and you reduce women to the sum total of their “lady parts”. Only the truly blind will not see through that, and unfortunately there is nothing that will help those women, because deep inside they probably believe it. Add in the “First Time” ad and you’ve just knocked out a larger group of women - save for the malleable college crowd who are too concerned about being “cool” to realize how they are being used... Whether for sex, OR a vote!
In a more sane universe, Sandra Fluke would never have been given a microphone. And, the Dem convention had her as a speaker? Am I watching a black comedy?
Prediction: The leadership of the Dem party will become more extreme in the months and years to come.
Let's see....because of Liberals we have 50 MILLION DEAD BABIES and they are LUSTING FOR MORE!! WOmen are touting themselves as just SLUTS, Gays are EVERYWHERE DEMANDING to be LOVED for their SEX ACTS....what's next, LEGAL INCEST??? How much WORSE can this country get??
I find it interesting that 40 years of women’s lib to stop men sexually objectifying women has resulted in women sexually objectifying themselves. Apparently liberal women think they really are just V’s.
I also love how women are so independent, they don’t need a man to have a baby and to tell them what to do. They just need the government to take money from working men to give them their free stuff for the sexual organs and their little bast**d children. Now they are free to create new little losers with the losers their V’s have sex with.
And re-stating for emphasis:
Prediction: The leadership of the Dem party will become more extreme in the months and years to come.
We should all talk to our daughters and sons, about the future of this country, before they vote. They will inherit the massive debt and weak country, if we continue to tax and spend.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.