Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Lowering quals for women coming soon I bet.

Then they can announce women are equal physically.

1 posted on 10/24/2012 9:52:17 AM PDT by QT3.14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: QT3.14

This is the case everywhere, in sports (golf) and employment - lower the bar to make it unfair to men.

If women want to do the same job as men, they should have to meet the EXACT SAME STANDARDS.


2 posted on 10/24/2012 9:54:46 AM PDT by fwdude ( You cannot compromise with that which you must defeat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

The Standards will definitely have to be lowered for the vaginally impaired.


3 posted on 10/24/2012 9:56:52 AM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

My son said the Quigly at Quantico was a piece of cake compared to the combat endurance test. Dehydration is what nearly broke him. He handled the physicality OK.


4 posted on 10/24/2012 9:58:17 AM PDT by Blueflag (Res ipsa loquitur: non vehere est inermus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Only uncivilized countries send their women into combat.


5 posted on 10/24/2012 10:00:15 AM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IncPen

The Heart and The Fist- Eric Greitens - saw him this past Sunday on Pritzker Military Library


6 posted on 10/24/2012 10:00:16 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Heck, if 26 Marines dropped out these two WM’s have
nothing to be ashamed of.

Ooooorah! Marines!


7 posted on 10/24/2012 10:00:57 AM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Yup. When women couldn’t meet the standardsat West Point, they lowered the standard.


8 posted on 10/24/2012 10:02:59 AM PDT by Kozak (The means of defence again.t foreign danger, have been always the instruments of tyranny at home JM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
From the article:

The Marines are keeping the identities of the two female volunteers private. However, one of the women released a statement after dropping out of the program, which reads in part:

“I want to try to open up a door, maybe, for women after me. I don’t know how far it will open, but I’m hoping to make a difference for women down the road.”

Since this woman was chosen for her extraordinary female physical condition, I opine that the door is not made to be opened by the female of the species; unless, of course, the standard is lowered to that of a 50 year-old couch-potato male.

9 posted on 10/24/2012 10:05:17 AM PDT by Thommas (The snout of the camel is in the tent..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
Was it the bayonnettes portion?
10 posted on 10/24/2012 10:07:02 AM PDT by Darth Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
“I want to try to open up a door, maybe, for women after me. I don’t know how far it will open, but I’m hoping to make a difference for women down the road.”

Interesting, I would have thought that her priority would have been making a difference for her country and the Corps.

12 posted on 10/24/2012 10:23:39 AM PDT by TankerKC (If Mitt Romney is elected, everyone in the US will die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

When I was assigned to OCS 30 years ago there was a major problem with trying to fairly include the women officer candidates (WOC’s) into the overall evaluations of the candidates. Back then, I believe we only had one OCC per year with women (other than the summer programs.)

The WOC’s were in a separate platoon within a candidate company. They did not participate in all of the same physical training as the men such as the obstacle course, pull ups, 3 mile run. They also didn’t have the same objective evaluations due to differences in the field exercise evaluations. So when it came to determining the top grads in the class, it became very difficult to compare apples to apples.

As I remember it (dimly) there were 3 categories of evaluations used to determine class rank: leadership, physical fitness & academic.

Women’s evaluations were always a problem while trying to keep them somewhat in line with the men’s scores. How would it have looked if the top 5 grads of a company had all been women due to them performing so well because they had easier testing requirements on some of the separate but unequal events?

Apparently this is not the case when all Marines are tested equally as in the infantry officer course.

So what are they to do, be politically correct and lower the standards for everyone and maybe even bend the rules so the honor graduate is occasionally a woman? I hope and pray that’s not the case!


14 posted on 10/24/2012 10:29:32 AM PDT by Perseverando (Gun control? It's the OBOTS who are filling up prisons for violent crimes, not the Tea Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

They just recently did it for ‘the races’ in the FL schools, and that’s going to work out real well, too, as soon as it becomes national eh-duh-ka-shun policy.


17 posted on 10/24/2012 10:40:42 AM PDT by Carriage Hill ("0bummer's a towering figure" - even a Garden Gnome casts a long shadow at sunset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

doesn’t matter to me if they passed at twice the rate of men and with twice as good a score...are they required to sign up for the draft? why not?

until they can be drafted, they’ll never be “equal”.
“equal” presumes equal responsabilities.


22 posted on 10/24/2012 11:05:49 AM PDT by TurboZamboni (Looting the future to bribe the present)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Men and women are different, and only idiots pretend otherwise. Putting men and women together in combat endangers the men in more ways than one.

23 posted on 10/24/2012 11:07:06 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

“The two female lieutenants failed to complete the combat endurance test portion of the program, as did 26 male Marines.”

Right. Some males failed, but ALL THE WOMEN FAILED. Not just any women, women specially selected as most likely to pass.


25 posted on 10/24/2012 11:22:09 AM PDT by Brooklyn Attitude (We won't stand for biased umps fixing a ball game but we allow a biased media to fix elections.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14
I sure wish somebody would inject reality into this stuff: infantry combat is brutal, direct face-to-face murder and no place for ladies or weak men.

Nothing has changed. Even though the different interest groups would like to "break through all barriers", this isn't one that they should come near. War is killing, nothing more, nothing less.

29 posted on 10/24/2012 11:34:58 AM PDT by Chainmail (A simple rule of life: if you can be blamed, you're responsible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Women have no business in combat. This is just PC nonsense.


31 posted on 10/24/2012 11:43:20 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Now they will lower the standards of course


33 posted on 10/24/2012 12:09:27 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: QT3.14

Respect them for making the effort. But DO NOT CHANGE THE STANDARDS! 26 men failed, too.


40 posted on 10/24/2012 3:30:58 PM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson