Posted on 10/23/2012 6:40:05 PM PDT by Perdogg
Officials at the White House and State Department were advised two hours after attackers assaulted the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, on September 11 that an Islamic militant group had claimed credit for the attack, official emails show.
The emails, obtained by Reuters from government sources not connected with U.S. spy agencies or the State Department and who requested anonymity, specifically mention that the Libyan group called Ansar al-Sharia had asserted responsibility for the attacks.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Correct me if Im wrong: doesnt Romney now receive national security briefings? If he knew this news was going to break, that would explain why he wasnt more forceful when the subject of Libya came up.
Not sure on the briefings, but would feel that someone in the community tipped his organization off.
Hence his wise, broader focus on Obamas foreign policy ineptness.
Well done Mitt.
Watch out now, barry is a cornered rat. This is when he will be the most dangerous. Just like that period of time between Nov. 6th and Jan. 20th when he applies project “scorched earth”. He will now be at his most dangerous. What will the military do?
Of course its worse than Watergate..at least with Watergate NO ONE DIED..I mean big freakin deal..someone breaks into a building and takes stuff..meanwhile here you have FOUR DEAD AMERICANS and Obama wanted to conceal the truth because he doesnt want to admit that Jihadists want us dead..he refuses to call ANYTHING terrorism anymore..he wont call Ft. Hood what it was..TERRORISM..instead its Workplace violence an arrogant, disgusting schmuck is what he is
2 reasons.
1) destroys his narrative, proves his incompetence
2). He’s a Dem and will be protected by MSM who never revealed his
Background, and inexperience
Barry, we have these things called emails
theyre like letters, except through computers.
Excellent.
Continuing your theme:
And people actually read them. Maybe you should too.
LOL. I think this transcends politics, but certainly will (or ought to) affect the election. The media, at least online, are reporting this, even MSNBC. I am not sure what is happening on air, as I don’t have access in my office.
The “optimal” result would be for the media to carry the ball on this and the GOP could watch from the sidelines as Obama continues to self-destruct. Don’t get me wrong, these lies from Obama should be called out, but I continue to hope (naively, maybe) that the media might do its job this time.
You posted: What does that even MEAN? I seriously do not understand the term “politicized”. Help me out here.
***
This is a truly substantive story, not just for political points. It will have political consequences against Obama’s interests (at least it should). To the extent possible we should stay above it by expressing our regret that the administration lied like this, to the American public and to the world. Directly referring to the elections should be avoided, in my humble view.
Bingo observation!
We got a glimpse of his cornered rat face at the last debate too. Remember his posture through the whole thing. He also gave some clues on how he is going to obfuscate the scandal. He made several comments the other night on how his administration was ‘doing their best to make sure the fighters they were supplying with weapons were responsible parties’, etc.
Watch for this to be the official line when it all hits the fan. He brought up the fact that he was arming and organizing the so called freedom fighters in Libya and Syria several times the other night...which seemed very strange because he has never admitted it with such clarity until then. The media will back him up as best they can and the line will be...’well...we could not prevent some of those arms from getting into the wrong hands’.
This is why Obama could not let the FBI get on the ground in Benghazi until someone removed the evidence of American weapons being used in the attack.
FOX news is discussing the military options that were availabl during the attac
It was shown that there were 2 destroyers off the Libyan coast. The military quickly moved assets to assist including marines, special forces Apaches and a few other assets that I missed that apparently could have made a difference during the attack. The US has a major base in Sicily, less than 500 miles from Benghazi. There were options...
So, Obama knew two hours in- we had troops available one hour away from Benghazi- and yet he did nothing as the attack lasted for another four hours, and our agents were killed. This is one of the most shameful, frightening acts by a president in US history...
Good catch! Yes, I remember those photos.
The ‘Arab Spring’ and OWS were all one creation and coordinated. So were the flotillas. That started it off. Bill Ayers was right in the middle of it.
"Our commander-in-chief and his national-security team in Washington are listening to the phone calls from the Americans under attack and watching real-time video from a drone circling overhead. Yet the U.S. military sends no aid. Why?"
FOX news is discussing the military options that were availabl during the attac
It was shown that there were 2 destroyers off the Libyan coast. The military quickly moved assets to assist including marines, special forces Apaches and a few other assets that I missed that apparently could have made a difference during the attack. The US has a major base in Sicily, less than 500 miles from Benghazi. There were options...
Barry could not afford sending more troops in since that would show he was
at war with the freed Libya.
He decided to sacrifice those stationed there to further his narrative of a
successful mideast strategy.
Worse than Watergate, and swept under the rug by the MSM.
Hmmmm...look what I found:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-20055271
This deserves a thread of it’s own, but I could not get my iPad to copy and paste right.
Headline:
Russia: Syrian Rebels Have US Made Weapons
This is part of the puzzle for sure.
Obama did not want to risk our aircraft being shot down with our own weapons that HE gave to the terrorists either. This is the dirty little secret.
Obama did not want to risk our aircraft being shot down with our own weapons that HE gave to the terrorists either. This is the dirty little secret.
Good observation. To do noyhing is mind boggling.
As mentioned by some of the military types during the Bret Baier special, they thought that even sending a gun ship to sweep the area would cause the attackers to potentially flee.
Your comments provided some reason why that may not have been done.
Thanks for the info.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.