Posted on 10/23/2012 2:15:15 PM PDT by LittleSpotBlog
Famed civil rights attorney Gloria Allred will be in a Boston area courtroom Wednesday in an attempt to unseal the sworn testimony given by Republican Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney, in a prior court case, RadarOnline.com is exclusively reporting.
(Excerpt) Read more at m.radaronline.com ...
She is so Yesterday
TT
0Bama is going to have much bigger problems with Foreign Campaign Contributions (JMHO)
TT
First, she (and Axlerod) destroyed Herman Cain.
Second, she was waiting in the wings to destroy Newt Gingrich (She was in discussions with one of Newt’s ex wifes).
She was ready to represent Sandra Fluke to wage war against Rick Santorum.
Now, she is going to try to destroy Mitt Romney with more Axlerod money.
Now, Donald Trump’s threat sounds a whole lot more interesting that Allred’s. Trump claims to have unearthed divorce papers that were once filed by Michelle Obama, but never pursued. Now, that could be interesting, especially if the divorce was based on a philandering husband.
Now, Donald Trump’s threat sounds a whole lot more interesting that Allred’s. Trump claims to have unearthed divorce papers that were once filed by Michelle Obama, but never pursued. Now, that could be interesting, especially if the divorce was based on a philandering husband.
This is a Patrick appointee.
What could go wrong?
And of course, no matter how nuts this is, the sycophants in the media will eat it all up—and anything Trump talks about will be portrayed as looney, but Allred’s will be the gospel
Here’s a fun theory:
Divorce requested for irreconcilable differences - can’t agree what religion to raise the kids, Muslim or Communist.
It’d be nice if he got ahold of the video the LA Times has been hiding.
This could backfire. It might be the other party that has something to hide, and Mitt just agreed to have it sealed to ease the resolution of the issue. Wouldn’t it be funny if this turns out to be something that makes Romney look good.
So, you blame the fiasco perpetrated by her husband on her, because she wouldn’t accede to his demands? (From what I recall, she was not the one who was pushing for activity in certain kinds of nightclubs)
I was thinking more along the lines of irreconcilable differences in sexual preference.
I was thinking more along the lines of irreconcilable differences in sexual preference.
WE already know he had some sexual preferences and even that didn’t get enough media attention.
So many secrets and yet we still know enough to be able to call him PURE EVIL!
He has gotten by with so many skeletons and lies. PURE EVIL!
Allred is NOT admitted to practice in Mass
http://massbbo.org/bbolookup.php
She has to apprea Pro hac vice and an attorney MUST vouch for her. If she is doing this pro bono (duh) she does not have to pay the fee. SOMEBODY is paying her fees so that means she is NOT doing this probono.
There has to be a hearing.
The hearing could be set after the election.
If an amature can find this information, then any real journolist can and should find it all. Allred becomes an non story zippity quick.
she has to pay 101 dollars to appear pro hac vice unless she is doing it pro bono. If axelrod is paying her tab then that is NOT pro bono. (iow just because the client is not paying then that is still not pro bono)
also does she even have a client with standing? if this was a mass vs romney case, there is no party to represent except romney.
it is a tactical case. an issue of embarassing. if mitt does not fight it and then it gets trumped in the news cycle and HOPEFULLY opens allred to disbarment. (even if not admitted in mass, if she is disbarred in mass, calif will also disbar her.)
Chicago politics.
We had a front row seat for it.
Wow.
This appears to be it....Romney testified in a divorce proceeding.
A big nothing unless he admitted to an affair or something, which is ridiculous.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2949283/posts
Exactly. All the hand wringers here making comparisons to Jack Ryan forget one little thing-—Romney was never in a divorce, much less a messy one, and apparently was not the plaintiff in this case. This is exactly what you said—another dishonest will-o-the-wisp like the tax returns to start a whole new campaign of innuendo on Romney. Won’t work. People will see it for what it is-—a desperation move and the last gasps of a dying campaign.
AND kicks her @$$.
The first had only one breast. So the next models in the series ended up with odd numbers.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.