Nothing will be provable. What we all saw was quite bad enough.
No prosecution necessary. It all worked to Romney’s benefit. The eversion of the intended effect is sufficient punishment, I think.
The left is evil. I watch day after day as their minions keep defending them. They will say anything.
I was happy to see the Republican ad come out with the timeline - proving clearly that this corrupt administration was deliberatley steering the American public for the sake of the election.
Someone has to answer as to why Crowldy happened to have that transcript, and how Obama knew to ask her to refer to it. Unbelievable corruption.
While I tend to do as little business as possible with companies that advertise on media outlets that insult me, I’m only one guy. I think it’s time to advance the theme that: “If you can’t trust the network, you can’t trust their advertisers.” This takes the fight directly to the pocketbook of both entities.
“Congress shall make no law....abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press...”
The MSM is free to tell all the lies they want.
Jackass Romney agreed to the format, and if he didn’t know that sabotage could be expected, he’s too stupid to be president.
Sorry, I blame the stupid Republican party for agreeing on the moderator and the format. Why would anyone be surprised at this??
True, to a point: We own vast segments of the new media. We are gradually increasing in power and influence.
Mitt Romney finally brought up the very ugly topic of Fast & Furious. Obama wasted no time at all -- "Candy?" he said -- and Candy Crowley very dutifully jumped in and changed the topic. Almost like they had pre-arranged that strategy.
CNN threw away their last bit of credibility, and for what?
Romney saw the trap coming, and wriggled free. All this whining about how Romney did not prosecute the attack is just people upset because he declined to stick his head in the noose.
When it’s two against one, and you don’t know what the deal is, you back off. It’s simple math. Romney backed off, because he could sense the hammer, but could not see from which direction the blow was going to fall.
That’s because Romney is smarter than Obama, Crowley and Michelle all put together.
Now this failed ambush will keep the Benghazi story alive through Election Day, and demonstrate to the voters how Obama and his MFM enablers are lying cheats. This is a disaster for Obama and the MFM.
Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch...
CNN has a multi-million dollar appeal languishing in Obama’s stacked NLRB (NLRB Case 05-CA-031828).
An administrative-law judge (an Obama donor) ruled against CNN in 2009 .
CNN’s appeal has since set before the 4 member NLRB board: 3 of them Obama appointees.
It seems awfully convenient that Obama has had this hanging over CNN’s head his whole tenure.
Can’t help but wonder if it was why Crowley was even more partisan than I expected.
Exactly!
It seems to me there has been a lot of this type of thing going on. The unemployment numbers being reported as dipping below 8% is one of them. Supposedly there was collusion with the person in California responsible for turning in the numbers, but many in the media immediately touted the decrease as truth without asking how it could have occurred.
I have been calling this group of sycophantic supporters The Mouthpiece Media for a few years. They have become more than that now. They are The Moat Media for Obama. They serve as a moat between the people and their boy king in the castle.
Before the debate I predicted Crowley would advocate for Obama. She did. It's really not a surprise at all.
There need no have been "collusion" as you claim for the events to have transpired as they did. Of course he'd say "get the transcript" because it makes it sounds like he's absolutely certain of his remarked. He was bluffing and Crowley was fooled because she wanted to be fooled; she was on his side.
An odder moment came with Obama walking towards a questioner before the questioner was identified other than by name. He hadn't stood up for his question yet.
The question was about Libya and supposedly born of a workplace "brain trust" discussion. It certainly appeared Obama may have known the questioner on sight and went to him.
Why didn’t he say “Replay the video”?????
had to have video conferenced to try and cover — couldn’t be anywhere near each other physically, obviously)....It was stated from a Daily Caller (?) don’t know if that was the source, she visited the White Hut on Sunday, before the debate. Let me find that thread.
Crowley waved the transcript at obama, as if to say, “Got right here,Boss!” like a good little(?) sycophant.
People all over the country saw it. Left and right saw it. Of course, the left will ignore it and and try to change the subject. The Right should pound and pound and pound it home on the next debate which WILL BE ON FOREIGN POLICY.
This debate was supposed to be about DOMESTIC POLICY. Why then was a question on LIBYA allowed in the first place unless she planned this whole deal? She chose the questions! Then she set up the whole thing ON HER OWN, knowing that she would get an okay from upstairs suits.
Obama KNEW she had that transcript! He said, “Get THE transcript!” NOT “Get A transcript!” ..............
It is national security. CNN does not want the public to question this administration, know the truth or hold Obama accountable.
Prosecute? Really? Did I accidentally get redirected to D U?
This is small government conservatism website, not fascists in paradise. The last thing we need is gubment prosecutors rounding up journalists and trying them for treason. We have that little first amendment after all.
No I don’t this kind this post is funny! Come on people. Mitt could sue the debate commission for breach of contract. It would be a stupid thing to do. Leave the gubment, its prosecutors, guns, dogs, courts, and thugs out of it.
How Much of a Set-Up Was Crowley's Libya Question? Jack Cashill
...Crowley conceded a shortage of time and an excess of audience questions. Nevertheless, instead of moving on to that next question, Crowley asked a question of her own. Even before she began to ask, however, Obama was strolling confidently towards Crowley as though he knew what was going to happen next.
The question involved Secretary of State Clinton's taking responsibility for embassy security. Asked Crowley, "Does the buck stop with the secretary of state?" Obama was more than ready for this one. "Secretary Clinton has done an extraordinary job, but she works for me," said he forcefully. "I'm the president, and I'm always responsible."