Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary’s non mea culpa (Hitlary throwing Zero under the train)
Daily Caller ^ | 10/18/2012 | Edward Klein

Posted on 10/18/2012 12:53:04 PM PDT by Snuph

After the Clinton legal team had a chance to review the State Department cable traffic between Benghazi and Washington, the experts came to the conclusion that the cables proved that Hillary had in fact given specific instructions to beef up security in Libya, and that if those orders had been carried out — which they weren’t — they could conceivably have avoided the tragedy.

Clearly, someone in the Obama administration dropped the ball — and the president was still insisting that it was not his fault.

In the end, then, Hillary decided to assume responsibility to show that she was acting more presidential than the president.

I am told by my sources that she firmly believes that when the State Department cable traffic is made public, either through leaks to the press or during formal House committee hearings, it will exonerate her and shift the blame for the entire mess onto the president.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillarysfault; nothillarysfault; obamasfault
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
The Clintons are out in force today!!! 3rd post on their actions to throw Zero under the bus today.
1 posted on 10/18/2012 12:53:05 PM PDT by Snuph
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Snuph

same article

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2946762/posts


2 posted on 10/18/2012 12:59:02 PM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thouworm

With Democrats it’s never about fixing a problem. It’s all about assigning blame to someone else.


3 posted on 10/18/2012 1:01:26 PM PDT by generally (Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Snuph
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"Governor Romney's argument is, we're not fixed, so fire him and put me in," said Clinton. "It is true we're not fixed. When President Obama looked into the eyes of that man who said in the debate, I had so much hope four years ago and I don't now, I thought he was going to cry. Because he knows that it's not fixed."--Bill Clinton, Oct 17, 2012

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/bill-clinton-romneys-argument-true-were-not-fixed_654893.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=OeBCWLGoJb0
______________________________________________________

A Romney spokesman comments: "We agree with former President Bill Clinton. The economy has not been fixed under President Barack Obama. Today, more than 23 million Americans are struggling for work, poverty has increased and food stamps are at record levels. Mitt Romney believes we can do better by creating 12 million new jobs with higher take-home pay, cutting spending to put our nation on course for a balanced budget, and actually fixing our economy."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/bill-clinton-romneys-argument-true-were-not-fixed_654893.html

4 posted on 10/18/2012 1:02:28 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuph
Image and video hosting by TinyPic
5 posted on 10/18/2012 1:03:11 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thouworm
same article

That one was posted 2 hours ago. This is an important development.

6 posted on 10/18/2012 1:05:20 PM PDT by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Snuph

I would think the Obama team would have put out any document Hillary has asking for more security so they could blame an underling. Unless the document was from Hillary to Obama. Then it’s bad news Barack.


7 posted on 10/18/2012 1:05:46 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuph

In dealing with the clintons, I hope we keep in mind... the enemy of my enemy is still my enemy.


8 posted on 10/18/2012 1:07:23 PM PDT by Heart of Georgia ("Together we will unite America and get this done" - Paul Ryan - August 11, 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuph
If Hillary is called to testify, it could all be over by sundown.
9 posted on 10/18/2012 1:07:23 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuph

Unless one or the other wants to accuse the other of some specific charge of dereliction or malfeasance neither one can escape their own responsibility or take on the other one’s. They both failed miserably to secure the consulate and ambassador Stevens. They both participated in the “video” hoax. The first was a major failure of duty. The second a conspiracy to defraud the American people.


10 posted on 10/18/2012 1:07:42 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuph
After the "generous" DNC speech, Bill "gives" with one hand and "takes" with the other.

The imagery created today, conceding that Romney is right that the economy is not "fixed," and that Bill thought Obama was going to "cry" when the man asked the question Tuesday night, once in the mind, stays there. A grown man, crying because he failed to deliver on bold promises is not the image the Obama campaign has tried to manufacture and sell.

Bill's "generous" pity, combined with Hillary's noble CEO-type acceptance of "responsibility" on the eve of the Tuesday debate, which forced the President's reluctant "no, let me do it" response plays right into Romney's playbook now and Hillary's future plans.

11 posted on 10/18/2012 1:10:13 PM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ETL

I posted on this very site on the day Hillary Clinton fell on her sword for that dirt bag, Obama....and stated that Bill Clinton would cut him to pieces. The person directly responsible for the murders in Libya, of our ambassador and three public servants is none other then POTUS Barack Hussein Obama!!! Obama could care less about those patriotic heroes. He is only for himself, cold hearted, evil, America hater that he is!!!

IMHO.....I do not see how anyone that calls themselves an American citizen could ever vote for this destroyer of the American Republic!!! Obama must be defeated politically, along with his useless Democrat party!!! ABO!!!


12 posted on 10/18/2012 1:13:42 PM PDT by JLAGRAYFOX ( My only objective is defeat and destroy Obama & his Democrat Party, politically!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Heart of Georgia
In dealing with the clintons, I hope we keep in mind... the enemy of my enemy is still my enemy.

That point cannot be overstressed.

Perhaps some dark day when ChiCom warheads are raining down on American cities with pinpoint American-made accuracy the doubters will finally understand the depths of the Clinton's mendacity.

13 posted on 10/18/2012 1:13:59 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Snuph

I think this can’t be trusted, coming from Billy Boy.

What Charming Billy and Evita give with one hand, they will surely take away with the other.

Hmmmm...suspicious about these two.


14 posted on 10/18/2012 1:15:37 PM PDT by SMARTY ("The man who has no inner-life is a slave to his surroundings. "Henri Frederic Amiel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuph

“...the experts came to the conclusion that the cables proved that Hillary had in fact given specific instructions to beef up security in Libya, and that if...”

Jesus, if it took a team of Clinton lawyers to reach that conclusion, the cables must be in Clintonese and/or parsed to nth degree. They may have forgotten the meaning of “is” again.


15 posted on 10/18/2012 1:19:41 PM PDT by izzatzo (Just beat Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuph

Touché!


16 posted on 10/18/2012 1:26:07 PM PDT by Bon mots (Abu Ghraib: 47 Times on the front page of the NY Times | Benghazi: 2 Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snuph

I like the old man’s nuclear option better - have Hillary resign ahead of the election. That’d be sweet.


17 posted on 10/18/2012 1:31:20 PM PDT by gotribe (He's a mack-daddy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AV415yit7Zg)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: izzatzo

You noted:

“...the experts came to the conclusion that the cables proved that Hillary had in fact given specific instructions to beef up security in Libya, and that if...”

Jesus, if it took a team of Clinton lawyers to reach that conclusion, the cables must be in Clintonese and/or parsed to nth degree. They may have forgotten the meaning of “is” again.

I agree, but what amazes me is that she would need someone else to figure that out for her? Don’t you think you would maybe remember something like that?

I just don’t know. My memeory is pretty good about a lot of things, and some things not so much, so I guess it’s possible....


18 posted on 10/18/2012 1:32:49 PM PDT by kevslisababy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ETL; Snuph

“That one was posted 2 hours ago. This is an important development.”

No disagreement at all. Just linking threads because one never knows which thread will yield the better research and documentation.

To wit, your post 4 substantiating and linking article to snuph’s excellent point in post #1. I was going to go hunting for those links.

I need to explain myself better when I link threads. I never have any problems with duplicate threads, duplicate articles or.... ETL’s “spam”! lol. “Spam” on with your deadly factual info!


19 posted on 10/18/2012 1:34:21 PM PDT by thouworm (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ETL

If Hillary had proof that she ordered beefed up security for Benghazi then why didn’t she say so during her mea culpa? And seeing as how Amb Stevens made numerous requests for more security, it’s not believable that Hillary didn’t remeber this.

This seems like a bogus story and it shouldn’t be too difficult to manufacture this “evidence” that will supposedly prove her new story.

IMO, the only reason Hillary stepped up is becuz she is as deep in the crapola as her boss in the coverup of what was REALLY going on over there.


20 posted on 10/18/2012 1:39:08 PM PDT by uncitizen (Impeach Obama NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson