Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fiscal Cliff? The Real Threat Is The 'Entitlement Cliff'
IBD ^ | 10/16/2012 | By MARK E. LITOW AND MERRILL MATTHEWS

Posted on 10/16/2012 5:24:43 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Putting Paul Ryan on the GOP ticket ensured that the presidential campaign would focus some attention on Medicare's fiscal challenges.

But that debate barely touches the scope or depth of the entitlement challenges facing the U.S. economy. The fiscal cliff coming at the end of the year pales vs. the entitlement cliff forced on us by a multitude of entitlement programs that we can't afford.

Most people think of entitlement programs as Social Security and Medicare for seniors, Medicaid and perhaps some other means-tested welfare programs. But there are many more: veteran benefits, unemployment, the children's health insurance program, disability income, the GI bill, Head Start.

The U.S. Census Bureau says 108 million Americans live in households where at least one person participates in a means-tested program. We estimate that 80 million are the primary recipients, though millions more share those benefits. That number has been growing rapidly under President Obama.

Since the president took office:

• Medicaid is up from 46.9 million to 56 million people.

• Disability beneficiaries are up from 7.5 million to 8.8 million.

• The food stamp program has grown from 32 million Americans to 47 million.

Add to that 80 million beneficiaries 40 million Americans age 65 or older on Social Security and Medicare (9 million of the 49 million on Medicare, including some under age 65, also receive means-tested benefits).

That 120 million does not include the numerous smaller entitlement programs.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: debt; deficit; entitlement; fiscalcliff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 10/16/2012 5:24:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As Tip ‘o Neill used to say ...

“A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money.”

Put them all together, and a number approaching half of the country participates in an entitlement program.

Now add in the 16 million new Medicaid beneficiaries, thanks to ObamaCare, plus an estimated 12 million people who enter the health insurance exchanges by 2014, where most will receive federal subsidies.

The budget implications of these programs are huge. For fiscal 2012, America spent $2.2 trillion of its $3.7 trillion budget on entitlement programs — $400 billion less than the $2.6 trillion in gross annual revenues.

Oh, and interest on the federal debt was $220 billion.


2 posted on 10/16/2012 5:26:45 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

60% of the budget goes to entitlements, but I’m sure that number has been climbing since Obama took office. We’re probably at 65 or 70 percent now.


3 posted on 10/16/2012 5:29:44 AM PDT by Jack Hydrazine (It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This editorial is right. The MSM uses phrases like “fiscal cliff” and says we need to do something about the “deficit.” Those words hide the problem, which is SPENDING. In particular, domestic social spending, including entitlements. We need to cut spending, period. Look at any graph or chart of spending over the past 5 years, 10 years, 20 years, 40 years. It has gone up way faster than inflation and population growth. It is the problem, not the “deficit” or some “fiscal cliff.” I don’t even know what “fiscal cliff” means. Its silly. Call the issue what it is — a huge increase in spending that is not supported by tax revenue.


4 posted on 10/16/2012 5:42:33 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you’re talking about real money.” Everett Dirksen


5 posted on 10/16/2012 5:44:42 AM PDT by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The other day, I got in line behind one of Holder’s women at the local Turkey Hill convenience store. She was buying state lottery tickets (PA). It took five minutes for her to buy all of them she wanted. She then paid with her welfare entitlement card. In short, I paid for her lottery tickets. And I felt like screaming.

Sooner or later, we are going to have to defund the Welfare Vulture Culture. If it takes a civil war, so be it.


6 posted on 10/16/2012 5:46:39 AM PDT by CaribCarter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

California is now floating tax increases (Prop 30) just to keep up with teacher pension funding. It ain’t about the kids!


7 posted on 10/16/2012 5:48:51 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The real threat is socialists.

“Socialism Is Legal Plunder” - The Law - Frederic Bastiat 1801-1850

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

DEFUND socialist collectives, foreign and domestic.
DISMANTLE domestic socialist programs.
DEPOPULATE socialists from the body politic.

DEFUNDING PBS/Big Bird was a good start. /sarcasm

“Do not listen to this sophistry by vested interests. The acceptance of these arguments will build legal plunder into a whole system. In fact, this has already occurred. The present-day delusion is an attempt to enrich everyone at the expense of everyone else; to make plunder universal under the pretense of organizing it.” - Bastiat 1801-1850

“Above all, if you wish to be strong, begin by rooting out every particle of socialism that may have crept into your legislation. This will be no light task.” - Bastiat 1801-1850

BIG GOVERNMENT IS CRONY SOCIALISM

http://www.usa.gov/directory/federal/index.shtml

“Progressive” plunderers and tyrannical totalitarians have placed many mandates on our existence, our time of life, our labor. We, our children and grandchildren, have become debt slaves to those organizations of sophisticated socialists.

live - free - republic

“—That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”


8 posted on 10/16/2012 6:52:49 AM PDT by PGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’s about the handouts at all levels of g’mint and citizenry.
Remember how it was about the oil.
My favorite part is how they turn around and demonize the “rich” who have already. in to many instances, given them more than they deserve.


9 posted on 10/16/2012 6:53:43 AM PDT by Leep (Forward! to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

Commies B commies, no matter their temporal location.

They will always demonize “the rich”, and as things get worse, whom they are pointing at goes down the scale.

To most sheeperals, “the rich” simply are those that are perceived as having more than they do. And it’s not about wanting or getting what “the rich” have, it’s about using the force of gov’t to keep “the rich” from having it at all.


10 posted on 10/16/2012 7:00:04 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Even if they completely eliminate ALL government departments and operations, and I mean EVERYTHING, but kept tax revenues the same....the revenues would still not cover entitlement spending....they would still have to borrow billions every year.

It's math, not politics. We are nearing the end of a long exponential function which will inescapably explode upwards. Any president making the required deep cuts will be savagely attacked and run out of office by the ignorant masses. It's a lose-lose situation for all the pols who must make the decision... and every month that goes by in avoidance, makes the ultimate solution increasingly more painful.

Blessent mon coeur d’une langueur monotone.

11 posted on 10/16/2012 7:06:34 AM PDT by Scooter100 ("Now that the fog has lifted, I still can't find my pipe". --- S. Holmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scooter100

The entitlements will be cut.
It’s just a matter of whether they are cut in a managed way, or in a catastropic failure.


12 posted on 10/16/2012 7:08:27 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MrB

There are way to many people who are second hand communist. They’re not reading Marx or Alinsky.
They are useful idiots,pawns, and even some are sellouts.
Most of them don’t care they just know someone wants to give them “free” stuff and someone else wants them to make a effort at being self reliant.


13 posted on 10/16/2012 7:15:15 AM PDT by Leep (Forward! to serfdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind



Student Loans are the next bubble to burst.



14 posted on 10/16/2012 7:21:07 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Glenn Harlan Reynolds: The Higher Education Bubble Is Going To Burst

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2012/06/28/glenn_harlan_reynolds_the_higher_education_bubble_is_going_to_burst.html


15 posted on 10/16/2012 7:24:20 AM PDT by jacknhoo (Luke 12:51. Think ye, that I am come to give peace on earth? I tell you, no; but separation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Leep

Someone posted last week -

the adult that says “no more free candy” to a room full of children is NOT going to be popular.


16 posted on 10/16/2012 7:24:20 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
60% of the budget goes to entitlements, but I’m sure that number has been climbing since Obama took office. We’re probably at 65 or 70 percent now.

JH...

It maybe worse.

IMHO we do not know if GAAP procedures are being used in Disney on the Potomac, what games did Reid-Pelosi-Obama pull w/ the numbers and agencies...

My latest prediction? My friends think I am nuts on this one..

I think things are so bad, that when Romney-Ryan do a full up GAAP accounting of the budget that they ask Wall St to close for a week to explain it to the American people like GWB closed the Markets post 9/11.

A series of Come to Jesus State of the Union Speeches with both Houses in Session to explain it all...

A penny for your thoughts...

17 posted on 10/16/2012 7:26:26 AM PDT by taildragger (( Fubarward Obama 2012, think about it :-) ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The Ford Board of Directors upgraded Mark Fields to a position that has the speculation that he is the replacement for Ford's Allan Mulally.

Romney is going to need Cost-Cutters / Turn-around experts.

The Ultimate one IMHO is Alan Mulally.

I don't want to ask him to leave Ford, that is his decision, but man, talk about the Go-To guy to add to Team Romney to help get our Fiscal House in Order...

Just to P*ss off the left and the likes of Schumer make him a Czar so he doesn't have to go through hearings for Confirmation ! LOL !!


18 posted on 10/16/2012 7:56:52 AM PDT by taildragger (( Fubarward Obama 2012, think about it :-) ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
Yes, if entitlements are increasing at 10% per year, then the doubling period is 7 years. However, if the "pond" is already 60% covered with "lily pads", then the crisis point of entitlements reaching 100% of revenues will occur during the next administration.

THIS is the single most critical issue facing our country, our government and each one of us. We are way beyond "managed" cuts, or tax increases to solve it. As Chuck Yeager would say, we're going to "auger in", and the impact will affect every living soul on the planet except hunter-gatherers. Frankly, I'm not sure why anyone in his right mind would want to be a politician at this point, because all they have to look forward to is the wrath of the electorate.

We've been lied to. The lying must end. But how do you tell the "Obama-phone Kids"? Do they even have the education to understand the coming "cliff"? It will be those angry folks who will make politics, or walking in the park, or washing your car a life-threatening activity.

May God help us all.

19 posted on 10/16/2012 7:59:40 AM PDT by Scooter100 ("Now that the fog has lifted, I still can't find my pipe". --- S. Holmes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Scooter100
Karl, is that you? LOL

These kinds of articles may be of interest to those who are now only getting up to speed. But for those of us who have been on top of this since the beginning know how it's gonna end - badly.

I used to fall in the deflation camp - I actually thought (silly me) that governments would follow the rule-of-law with regard to defaults and proceed via 'normal' bankruptcy channels.

Now I know better - they've chosen effective default via currency destruction. After all, this allows them to retain their bonuses & positions of power.

At the end of the day, it functionally doesn't matter if (a) they tell the 47% there is no more money; or (b) they lock the CPI and pay the 47% pennies on hundreds of dollars.

Option B keeps the structure in place - for awhile at least, which is all they're hoping for at this point.

20 posted on 10/16/2012 8:18:15 AM PDT by semantic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson