Help End The Obama Era In 2012
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!
Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!
Posted on 10/10/2012 4:01:01 PM PDT by dead
Vanity!
Wow, Bret Baier just presented a well documented timeline on the Obama Administration's disgusting behavior regarding the death of our Ambassador and others in Libya.
It was positively devastating!
He notes that the State Department had already concluded that there were absolutely NO protests outside the embassy and the attack was a coordinated terrorist attack. Then, AFTER THAT, Hillary stood next to the Ambassador's dead body and denounced the stupid YouTube video that she KNEW had nothing to do with it.
Then AFTER THAT, Obama went on David Letterman to condemn this completely irrelevant video.
Then Susan Rice went on five separate Sunday morning talk shows and repeatedly stated that it was NOT a terrorist attack, but protests about the video that got out of hand.
This was FIVE freaking days after the State Department and the White House knew this was a lie.
Clips of various FoxNews reports about the lack of protests, or various politicians stating that they had been informed unequivocally that it was a coordinated terrorist attack days before the Obama Administration continued to sell their pack of lies.
If the report becomes available on the Fox website, email links to everybody you know, especially fence sitters. It's not a lot of new information, but presented in such a manner as to form a completely devastating indictement of the Administration.
What an absolute disgrace!
Baier also notes that the NY Times, for days, never mentioned terrorism or al Qaeda after the foreign press and Fox News had been reporting the proven connections.
Contrary to the image they have of themselves, daily NY Times readers are among the worst informed people on earth.
You bet! :-)
Something inside, gut feeling, Hillary has bamboozled Obama, payback for stealing her election. Something is just not right about all this.
Maybe that is why you see Obama "thinking" behind her back, wondering how she did it????
Maybe he's thinking "How do I throw her under the bus", and she's thinking "how do I throw him under the bus"
Oh BOY rofl, let the good times roll.
Never forget that Obama is on the side of the muslims whether he is one or not. And both Hillary and Obama want to see America get her “comeuppance”. They are on the same page. They believe that all the ills in the world can be laid at Americas feet and we have stolen the rest of the worlds wealth.
Obama and Hillary are such a ‘tangled web’ that it is hard to figure out ‘how’ they work together. The Clinton machine was so powerful in 2008 and you wonder how Obama [and Soros] were able to not only shut them down, but silence them. I’ve read that Bill Clinton was threatened and I assume Sec of State was a payoff position for Hill.....
I wouldn’t doubt they work against each other any chance they can without being detected. It’s a puzzle inside a conundrum! Lol
Will the Clintons abandon Obama when the heat gets turned up on the Ambassador’s death case?
Some astute FReepers seemed to think that the Chicago Mob had incriminating evidence on Arkancides, and struck a mutually assured destruction deal with the Clintons.
The Clintons were intimidated from using their vaunted private detective operation to expose the truth of Baraq, and Hillary was the loser in 08.
Then ValJ and Axlegrease made Hillary SoS using the “keep your friends close and your enemies closer” principle.
I believe Obama is a Muslim, every thing he does points to it. I don’t like Hillary, she’s crafty, conniving and will do anything to ‘win’......but - I don’t see her wishing for the destruction of our country as I believe Obama does.
She’s a socialist, loved Alinsky, but to me she’s not as bad as Obama - who is? No question, Hillary has had Huma at her side for years and Hillary liked the Arafats.
Don’t know - can’t see into her mind.
I always gave a little ‘leeway’ to underlings - figuring the big kahuna gives the orders and they have to follow them. I do believe Hillary will get the blame for this. She had been pulling out security people from Benghazi - as I understand it. Obama’s not going to willingly ever take blame. If he loses I expect Bubba Clinton to reveal some facts in the future.
Hillary has been trying to not take the blame. There was a strategy session today. They are all trying to get on the same page of the cover-up. The problem is they have been caught. Hillary sings, the race is over. Hillary doesn’t sing, she is in the hot seat before the election.
Lol, I love that apt description! Yeah, they both had the goods on each other, no question about it. Obama has had powerful people guarding his background secrets. We were more aware of Hill's FBI files, Vince Foster, Mena Airport drug dealing, giving away secrets to the Chinese, etc, etc, with the Clintons.
Hillary's people actually questioned Obama's birth certificate during the primaries, and that was quickly shut down. We've learned a lot of evil stuff about Obama and it's just the tip of the iceburgh.
Because they knew about the anti-Muslim movie beforehand, very possibly had a hand in it, and knew that attacks were on the way, and were planning to use the anti-Muslim movie “causing” the attacks as a way to prohibit free speech. Sort of a “movie” version Fast and Furious.
[ They are all trying to get on the same page of the cover-up. ]
Obama actually attended a strategy meeting, wonder of wonders, lol. Well when you lie, you gotta get all your peeps in a row. Hillary isn’t going to take being the scapegoat well though.
No one. Not one soul.
If breaking the constitutional restraints on the presidency and outright breaking the law (GM/TARP/Solyndra/DREAM act/OC) hasn't riled anyone up, do you really think anyone will care about this, especially the "low information" voter that fully supports the kenyan?
>This is much worse than the two-bit breakin at the Watergate. Articles of impeachment should be drawn up immediately.<
I find it highly ironic that a young Hillary Rodham Clinton worked on Watergate.
Today, she’s entangled in the current, far worse, coverup.
BUMP! BUMP!
Let Rove and the SuperPacs handle the attacks. R/R can simply run on being competent technocrats as far as I care, as long as they win.
Nice and succinct - well done.
No matter which, it couldn't happen to a nicer gal!
To comment 52?
Just making sure I know what’s what!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.