Posted on 10/08/2012 7:45:03 PM PDT by Kaslin
In his speech to the Republican National Convention earlier this year, actor Clint Eastwood told the assembled crowd that there are more conservatives and moderates in Hollywood than they might think. Such people “play closer to the vest. They do not go around hot dogging it,” Eastwood said.
Unfortunately, actress Stacey Dash is finding out the hard way what happens to those celebrities who are willing to think for themselves: they get attacked by the very people who claim to preach “tolerance” and “peace.” (Note: This blog post is “not safe for work” and certainly not for children.)
The self-proclaimed merchants of tolerance were even more upset at the former Clueless star because she dares to back Mitt Romney even though she, like President Obama, is partially black. And of course, all black Americans must vote for Obama.
It all started yesterday afternoon when Dash tweeted out the following message on her Twitter page, accompanied by a photo of herself with an American flag:
“Vote for Romney. The only choice for your future. @mittromney @teamromney #mittromney #VOTE #voteromney”
Soon thereafter, Dash came under attack from vile Obama supporters who had no problem using racial ephithets to attack her personal choice.
“Kill yaself you old hag,” tweeted someone named Briggs Marley. His sentiments were echoed by several other bastions of tolerance.
Another genius calling himself Sherrick W. denounced Dash as “an indoor slave.” He was replying back to someone named @HelloItsBeyonce who had also used racial slurs to attack the actress: “You ready to head back to the fields, jiggaboo?” the person had said, using an offensive racial slur referring to dark-skinned black Americans.
Someone calling herself @ASvpFeefa blasted Dash using another racial slur: “TYPICAL OREO .. Voting for a white devil. #SICK”
Knowing how ridiculous some liberals can be, Dash must have anticipated the hatred that was going to come her way. She eventually started responding back to the jerks.
“lmao,” she tweeted back after one nimrod called her a “dumb bitch.” She tweeted back a simple smiley face emoticon to another hater who had instructed Dash to “Suck it easy, bitch,” clearly egging on the moron crowd.
Many other offensive tweets followed leading many believers in free speech to begin urging others to support Dash by adding the hashtag #ISupportStaceyDash to the end of their own tweets.
The Dash haters than began attacking those who supported her right to speak her mind. “Y r u on twitter grandma lol come to my hood ill shoot you hoe,” tweeted one illiterate jerk calling himself @JPvanity. He was replying to a conservative woman who had said the following:
“JP - a POTUS cares about a nation, not a color. Why do you vote if you only care about a color?”
Unfortunately the attacks on Dash are continuing right at this moment. If you have a moment and are on Twitter, please show @REALStaceyDash your support.
To read more of the vile insults that have been leveled against Dash, please visit Twitchy or just search for her name on Twitter.
According to Google she's 5' 5".
Also, she's now 46 years old.
“- - - - my liberal acquaintances will always think Obama is so intelligent - - - “
Intelligent is the ability to learn quickly.
Ignorant is being unaware of the facts.
Stupid is the inability to learn.
Since Obama flunked kindergarten, has sealed or “lost” his school records, fried his brain by “using drugs enthusiastically,” (his words in his book about dreams of his Father), it is doubtful that Obama is intelligent. Obama still believes that there are 57 States in the USA.
Obama is not capable of learning how to attend his own Jobs Council, while telling lies to the Media that everyday he works on jobs, jobs, jobs.
Obama’s on-the-job-training has been a failure in the financial stewardship and foreign policy areas. For example, Obama was incapable of passing a spending Budget in 4 budget years. Obama must therefore be graded stupid, or near stupid in those areas.
Obama considers discussion to be mindless bickering.
IOW, Obama does not play well with others. Guess the kindergarten teacher was right!
BTW, Give your Lib friends a copy of the book “Left Behind,” and then ask them to determine which character, if any, in the book THEY think most closely resembles Obama, today.
Do NOT tell them the answer [ = Nicolae Carpathia ], as a Liberal is a true believer, one that cannot carry on a reasoned discussion.
What you may find are a few Libs who will get the light bulb turned on, and thus you know that with these few, reasoned discussion is at least possible.
Politics stirs the tribal emotion in all of us. Otherwise sane people do a knee jerk primitive emotional spasm when it comes to choosing a tribal leader.
Ponder this:
Liberals are driven by the need to help.
Liberals believes the rich people do not need help.
Liberals believes that poor people do need help.
So the sooner the Liberals can make the rich people poor,
The sooner the Liberals can help them.
#:o)
“Marxism throws out the Laws of Nature so the Designer is killed and the marxists are gods and lords.”
Actually, die hard old school Marxists like Maoists do not reject all natural or scientific laws. They accept what can be scientifically “proven”, but reject belief in God.
You are absolutely correct in that Marxists reject God to replace Him with government.
The main fallacy in their belief is that the human class struggle as an undeniable natural law, like gravity. This explains why they continue to support historically failed policies like Keynesian economics.
Marxist’s faith goes against reason, while a Christian’s faith goes with reason, and beyond it.
What can I say ? It was a house built on our love. smirk.
Ayn Rand—stated that the Marxists were irrational because of their throwing out of Natural Law Theory.
They do this because they are radical egalitarians so they need to ignore human nature (female and male) because Marx wanted to abolish not only God, but the natural family unit. Parents contaminate the minds of their children—and they oppress them, etc., etc. All hierarchy is evil—although in nature, there is hierarchy in all the animal kingdom. Male and Female have to be interchangeable-—which is a joke and defies biology.
The State wants the little children, so they can form them. Feminism and homosexuality is part of their dialectical materialism—to pit man against woman—to abolish marriage and leave children vulnerable and confused.
Thousands of years of studies and all cultures had marriage between a male and female and the family unit was the basis for all cultures -but, like I said, Marx throws out Natural Law—so that he can perfect man—and create his utopia by totally controlling what children are allowed to learn and think.
Dr. Berlinski was talking about “science” in the Soviet Union-—and how absurd it was, because the scientists would have to force scientific theories into their Communist theory. They would have to IGNORE “cause and effect” if it strayed from their gospel. It was impossible to find Truth in such a system which is forced to ignore the actual Laws of Nature-—because Marxism is so flawed that the Laws of Nature prove it false.
Yowza! There’s “Not Guilty”, and then there’s “I will fight you all to the death, ala Kirk and Spock in that one episode of Star Trek, for this one.”
I agree that Marxism is flawed in rejecting natural laws as it applies to God, man, woman, and the family.
I am referring to laws of a scientific nature, as it applies to math, physics, and engineering - areas where the relationship of God and mankind are not apparently related. The Soviet Union maintained a space program that put Yuri Gagarin into space before we got a man up there.
The Soviets did a lot of copying and stealing, such as the B-29 and their space shuttle. My point is that Marxism does not reject technical progress, like in the ways Islamic countries did in previous decades.
She gets more beautiful every day. Was beautiful in Clueless and then a movie roughly entitled “Blue Lady”, but, wow. I’d nominate her for Miss America any day.
Glad to see that she’s more than just beautiful, thinking for herself (as opposed to Whoppy Goldberg, Beyonce, etc).
She’d make a helluva postergirl for Romney with either picture shown here. Sort of an updated Farah Fawcett.
Sorry that she is having to endure the black racism that is directed at her by the plantation mentality Obama supporters.
Gee, I’m so glad that Valerie Jarrett and Susan Rice are going to come to her defense. NOT!!!
Now post a pic of your daughter that pose
huh?
totally disgusting
Just another Bad, horrible role model for kids
I had never heard of Stacey Dash (until reading this post) but now I want to show my support. No, I do not do facelook or the tweeter (I do not text) thing.
Sad when we cannot show support for a political candidate without persecution.
And now not showing support for Present Obama is racist!...Wha?
I’ve never heard of her, but she’s BEAUTIFUL!!! And BRAVE!! She’ll NEVER work again.
YOWZA!!!!
Good grief! What a strikingly beautiful young lady.
“...my liberal acquaintances will always think Obama is so intelligent...”
Liberals will always consider their gods to be the most intelligent, most intellectual, most brilliant, most superior individuals on the face of the earth: the Christians will always be the dumbest, most ignorant idiots who are the cattle of humanity.
Absolutely disgusting.
IMHO
But at least she's got brains, right?
Nice picture! How do those things stay in there?
Huh? What are you talking about? Did you even read the article?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.