Wow! Great read. I’ve been thinking this as well. Prez Zero is going to come out swinging the next time around becAuse he thinks its his style and method of delivery and not the substance of what he is saying. And of course it’s the latter. He will most certainly over reach and insult Romney in order to fluster him. And our guy, who DOES his debAte homework, and has the correct arguements in terms of substance, will annihilate him. Popcorn is ready sitting out on my counter.
The author’s name must be Peter. /s
This really sums it up perfectly. And I have to give credit for the Freeper whose name I've forgotten who made an excellent point about this debate the other day. To paraphrase him/her: "Romney is 15 years older than Obama, but in that debate he seemed younger and more energetic."
One wonders how. The article explains well that Obama has never before really been tested by a serious opponent. The only way he knows how to get "fired up" is to shout lies and spread racial innuendo, like the street rabble-rouser that he is. That won't win him much from a suddenly skeptical public.
Key moment was Obama saying “look to the future.”
In other words, don’t talk about my record.
Obama disappeared into thin air.
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves.” Matthew 7, 15
“Take care that no one leads you astray. For many will come in My name, saying ‘I am the Christ,’ and they will lead many astray.” Matthew 24, 4-5
Dismissive and petulant versus Keyes' eloquence on Christianity:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-yUCg0TASc
Romney was impressive, I must admit, I have a bit more regard for him and the future when he wins. However, what I took away from the debate is IMHO, is that Obama lost, and his responses and lack of them, left me terrified of the 3 am call. (excuses, He was sound asleep, he had just had a nightmare, he was at a lower altitude, he and MO had just finished...) All the excuses I have heard tell me He cannot handle his position, he has demeaned his title and if he were to retain, we are done.
I have enjoyed the groveling apologists almost as much as seeing a totally inept president exposed for what he is....an ill-informed and out classed wussy man. The media loses as well as their mythical man. GO ROMNEY!!
Bambi was obviously tired and off his game ~ he couldn’t even summon the energy to give Romney the finger.
But without her charm.
So if Romney wins the next debate, Obama’s resurrection will be denied and his followers’ hopes will be crushed. I must say, the thought of that warms the very cockles of my heart!
Left to his own "wits," armed only with flashing a toothy smile which, when implemented at inappropriate times, reveals its own disconnection from the topic and moment, he uncloaked himself before the world.
With that said, the writer's placing of the name of the Messiah and the caricature of "a messiah" presented by this puppet of the forces of "progressivism" in the same article, though intended to differentiate between, is a little troubling.
The first spoke with authority, as "the Word made flesh."
The second uses a voice, a speaking style, and an acquired ability to "act" before audiences, with the help of prompters and teleprompters, to sound authoritative.
There is no comparison, nor should there be.
One came to reveal the Source of individual life, rights, liberty and a way to pursue happiness in keeping with Creator's law.
Others throughout history have come to entice individuals to forsake individual liberty and their unalienable rights in order to serve them and those who send them.
Would suggest to any who wish an authentic history of the ideas underlying America's founding a visit to this web site, at which Richard Frothingham's outstanding 1872 "History of the Rise of the Republic of the United States" can be read on line.
This 600+-page history traces the ideas which gave birth to the American founding. Throughout, Richard Frothingham, the historian, develops the idea that it is "the Christian idea of man" which allowed the philosophy underlying the Declaration of Independence and Constitution to become a reality--an idea which recognizes the individual and the Source of his/her "Creator"-endowed life, liberty and law.
Is there any wonder that the enemies of freedom, the so-called "progressives," do not promote such authentic histories of America? Their philosophy puts something called "the state," or "global interests" as being superior to individuals and requires a political elitist group to decide what role individuals are to play.
In other words, they must turn the Founders' ideas upside-down in order to achieve a common mediocrity for individuals and power for themselves.
So, the still-revolutionary idea stated by both Ryan and Romney about the Source of our rights became fodder for the current President's disdain recently, when he declared that they were "reruns" from the 20th Century and better suited for "black and white" television. (Actually, Mr. President, they are from a time much earlier than that.)
As Jefferson wisely observed:
"History, by apprising the people of the past, will enable them to judge of the future; it will avail them of the experience of other times and other nations; it will qualify them as judges of the actions and designs of men; it will enable them to know ambition under every disguise it may assume; and knowing it, to defeat its views."
All of which reinforces our conviction that the ideas of our Declaration of Independence and Constitution are as revolutionary and objectionable to tyrants as they were in 1776 and 1787!