Posted on 10/01/2012 11:13:15 AM PDT by hope_dies_last
I think were at the most dangerous time in our political history in terms of the balance of power in the role that the media plays in whether or not we maintain a free democracy or not. You know, when I first started in politics and for a long time before that everyone on both sides, Democrats and Republicans, despised the press commonly, because they were SOBs to everybody. Which is exactly what they should be. They were unrelenting. Whatever the biases were, they were essentially equal-opportunity people. That changed in 1980. There are a lot of reasons for it...
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/09/29/mainstream-media-threatening-our-country-future/#ixzz284VcPEhH
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
All part of deliberate Marxist planning. For several decades now journalism schools have been teaching students that their job is to “bring about social change”, not “report the news”.
The US media is completely irresponsible. They have destroyed the meaning of democracy by deliberately and willfully hiding facts from the public about democrat candidates, and propagating lies about normal people.
They intentionally blocked from the public the fact that obama was a communist and a black separatist with strong feelings for the ideology that he practiced as a child in Kenya.
Journalists or those [posing as journalists should be neutral in their reporting.
There is no neutrality in America;s media.
It is liberal in it;s views and distorts facts and makes up their own stories and reports them as facts.
It is impossible to believe anything the media reports in politics, and in other news, it has gotten so you can tell the race of the person’s being reported on by the failure to mention the race.
A vast majority don’t see the connection to the NWO, and the corruption that permeates media, politics, education, (the list goes on)....
We are entering an Orwellian Future, but with so much denial few will see things as they really are.
“David Plouffe, who is the White Houses Senior Adviserand was Obamas campaign manager last time, he and [David] Axelrod sort of switched out, Axelrod going back to Chicago for the campaignand just after it was announced that he was coming, an Iranian front group in Nigeria gave him $100,000 to give two speeches in Nigeria.”
“David Plouffe, who is the White Houses Senior Adviserand was Obamas campaign manager last time, he and [David] Axelrod sort of switched out, Axelrod going back to Chicago for the campaignand just after it was announced that he was coming, an Iranian front group in Nigeria gave him $100,000 to give two speeches in Nigeria.”
Anyone figured out why Media writers and Professors are anti-Republican?
Create worldwide conservative TV channels, create worldwide TV channels of all kinds of political ideologies, and create worldwide “all politically neutral, all of the time” TV channels! This is the definitive answer to dealing with worldwide political bias by the worldwide left MSM!
Most of their employees are skid marks on journalism's shorts because..
their employees are people who believe in Journalism as a way to make a difference. (How many times have you heard that since the "Watergate" days?)
Though these particular young people of the 1960s may not be "journalists" many of their underground comrades are "journalists" and all are today's establishment.
Does Willard even want to win? I guess we'll find out at Wednesdays debate.
There's so much low-hanging(rotten)fruit on the Obama tree it would be like shooting fish in a barrel for a debater like a Gingrich or Palin. We'll see if Romney really wants to take this Mau-Mau down or if he wants to play nicey-nice like McCain and lose.
Giant ping-out. One of the most important statements I’ve read in months.
Completely agree... there is more going on behind the scenes than we could even imagine and it’s all linked to a “grand plan” of world domination. The proponents of this plan are being influenced by demonic forces and their alliance is to the dark realm and the enemy of souls
In our local paper a shooting that killed a woman and wounded a man was being reported on just the other day. It was reported as gang related. The names of the victims were obvious names that are common to black people. The report stated at the end that they were looking for a "tall man" as the shooter. No other description, just a tall man. In other words, the paper was too chicken-$hit to report the race of the shooter even to help find a murderer.
Another FReeper once stated here and I quote: "Political correctness is the belief that you can pick up a turd by the clean end".
Political correctness should be consider anathema to a free press.
So if you wanted all the news you could get it from the newspapers, liberal, conservative, and extreme.. there of course was no talk radio as we know it today (The "Fairness" Doctrine ruled.). The weekly news magazines (Time and U.S.News & World Report) were excellent news magazines that tended conservative and Newsweek seemed too liberal for me.
My point: with the alternate media going strong we have returned to the "good old days."
The MSM employees should admit their bias the way conservatives do then so what would it matter what the MSM do.. until then they are skid marks on Journalism's shorts.
The asset, the environment, has been thus devalued to little more than that.
First, people want to control a view, then they want it as a place to hike, then add the water in the creek to protect the fish, a wetland for migratory birds, a whole watershed to control all erosion, or to add a buffer zone to reduce encounters with overpopulated bears. Then they want it to be closed to all public entry so that they don't feel guilty, then they want it connected to a corridor to transmit genetic variability, then they want a whole forest region as a carbon sink, then a mountain range as a bio-zone for the expression of spiritual life forces, then...
Given that the ability to gain personal control of commons is based upon the ability to make a political sale, there are several prerequisites:
I think that's reason enough to understand why owning a communications channel is profitable even while operations are not. As long as the owner of the company has other assets that can be profitably manipulated by said medium, there is no end to what they will do. This is why the real problem with the MSM is that they are owned by giant corporations using those operations to improve the returns on their other holdings.
Journalists no longer give us the news: They give us their opinions of the news. The sooner the American people wake up to that, the sooner we can make changes.
Things are starting to get interesting. But sadly the throngs of totally ill informed people who will be voting for the usurper yet again, will not see such articles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.