I haven't seen the ad, but I have to agree with Warren here. It is really despicable to make fun of her heritage.
/s
Posted on 09/25/2012 11:02:32 AM PDT by pabianice
Hello,
How does Scott Brown plan to win in November?
His answer is to talk about anything except how he votes on jobs, education, the environment, oil subsidies, or special deals for Wall Street.
Today, he launched a new television ad that doesn't say a thing about the challenges facing Massachusetts families. It's an ugly, nasty attack on my family and our heritage.
Today, I'm releasing a new tv ad that sets the record straight about my family. Watch it and share it with your friends to make sure the truth is heard.
I don't care how Scott Brown describes himself in his TV ads, but I do care about how he votes.
Last fall, with almost a quarter of a million people out of work here in Massachusetts, Scott Brown voted against three jobs bills.
When some of us were working to rein in Wall Street, Scott Brown was personally negotiating to weaken the rules and to give the big banks a $19 billion dollar break.
Scott Brown cosponsored a bill to let employers block coverage for routine cancer screenings and birth control.
Scott Brown voted against funding for summer jobs and voted twice to let the interest rate on student loans double.
And Scott Brown voted to limit the EPA's authority and repeatedly voted to give billions in subsidies to big oil companies.
This election boils down to one question: whose side do you stand on?
We know where Scott Brown stands -- and it's not with the people of Massachusetts. It's with big money and his Republican buddies.
Scott Brown can keep attacking my family. I'm going to keep fighting for yours.
Elizabeth
Ugly bottle-blonde squaw speak with forked tongue.
Lady (ahem..)
YOU LIED about your “heritage” in order to gain advantage that you wouldn’t have if you told the truth.
That is not a noble character trait. You are not qualified to represent the people of your state.
Her smok’m too much POS pipe.
Why didn’t Mr. Brown use the good looking ad?
She should change her campaign name.
Pocahontas for Senate.
That’ll show them.
Granny Warren occupies the Gottlieb Chair at Harvard. The Gottlieb Chair is endowed by the Gottlieb Law Firm, the largest on Wall Street which represents the largest Wall Street Banks.
It’s time for a Blonde, blue eyed Indian in the Senate!
What a crybaby. Typical self centered, divisive whiner......the truth hurts Faux. You immature little liar POC.
THAT's what happens when you 'compromise' and vote with the democraps- they USE IT AGAINST YOU in the next election...dumbasses in the GOP never learn this.
I think Brown should drop the Indian claims and start working on the law license issue. If she was practicing law without a license then that’s illegal. Exaggerating about your Indian heritage isn’t.
Its Fauxcahontas
Fauxcahontas has had her hohor dissed.
Let her scalp the offenders.
It is the way of Her People.
No, NO!
Not Indians, Liberals.
;-)
It’s time for a Blonde, blue eyed Indian in the Senate!Lie-A-watha is living proof the Vikings visited America and impregnated native Americans with their swimmers carrying the blond hair, blue eye genes.
I guess it is time for her to go on the war path.
I think the most telling thing to attack her on is her earning hundreds of thousands of dollars, I believe it’s around a half a million, representing the interests of insurance companies against the interests of asbestos victims and coal mining claimants, while posing as the defender of the little guy. Oh, yeah, and making over $300,000 a year to teach ONE course at Harvard, and whining about students having to carry the onerous financial burden of their brainwashing.
She’s a damned hypocrite.
Oh, yeah, AND she rails against people profiting from flipping real estate properties, and I understand she’s made quite a bit of money doing that, too.
Not only was she practicing law illegally she was representing Traveler’s Insurance.
“In the case, Warren defended Travelers as it sought protection from future claims as part of an agreement that would also unlock a $500 million settlement for asbestos victims, a step many victims supported. After Warren’s work on the case ended, however, Travelers won another court ruling that allowed it to avoid paying victims. That ruling is under appeal.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
