Skip to comments.
Napolitano Says Cybersecurity Executive Order Almost Ready
thenewamerican.com ^
| 9/20/12
| Joe Wolverton, II
Posted on 09/21/2012 10:41:01 AM PDT by ColdOne
Department of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano revealed September 19 that an executive order granting the president sweeping power over the Internet is close to completion.
(Excerpt) Read more at thenewamerican.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: agenda21; shadowwars; threatmatrix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
1
posted on
09/21/2012 10:41:04 AM PDT
by
ColdOne
To: ColdOne
I’m at a loss to know why there isn’t some agency, or other branch of government that is charged with supporting and upholding the U.S. Constitution. Czars, executive orders, are bypassing the checks and balances that are paramount in our Constitution.
When will enough be enough?
2
posted on
09/21/2012 10:44:39 AM PDT
by
jayrunner
To: ColdOne
Now, the mask slips on the reason for the quick and ready lie of the "film" last week!
Freedom of speech is the target.
To: ColdOne
an executive order granting the president sweeping power In other words, the president will grant himself sweeping power.
Something just struck me. Why not just abolish Congress and the Supreme Court? It would save some money. It's not like they're providing any checks on presidential power.
To: ColdOne
When Barry loses the election, he will immediately shut down the internet and impose martial law. What do you think the IRS, TSA, and “Homeland Security” bought hundreds of millions of rounds of ammo for? Barry has already made the Constitution meaningless. We need to be ready to fight the fascists.
5
posted on
09/21/2012 10:49:07 AM PDT
by
Astronaut
To: ColdOne
The Internet has no on/off switch. The Internet has no central control hub. Seems to me the bed-wetter in chief can't do a darn thing but make threats.
6
posted on
09/21/2012 10:50:01 AM PDT
by
KittenClaws
(You may have to fight a battle more than once in order to win it." - Margaret Thatcher)
To: ColdOne
He didn’t protect our ambassadors - didn’t ‘see’ the disaster the Arab Spring would be - and now he and Hillary are apologizing for the film.
I don’t think he’s doing cybersecutiy to protect us from radical Islamists,,,
7
posted on
09/21/2012 10:51:14 AM PDT
by
GOPJ
(You only establish a feel for the line by having crossed it. - - Freeper One Name)
To: ColdOne
But she also indicated that it would be issued as soon as a few issues were resolved.Issues such as detaining and disappearing any government officials who oppose it on constitutional grounds, for example?
This is proof positive that the purpose of DHS is to protect the regime from the people, not to protect the people from attack.
8
posted on
09/21/2012 10:52:26 AM PDT
by
JimRed
(Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed &water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS, NOW & FOREVER!)
To: ColdOne
With reference to previous post, the pattern is similar to the outcry for "women's health" issues as a cover for intruding on another Bill of Rights provision--freedom of religion, with all its exclusions of government intrusion into the lives and rights of individual.
We were warned by numerous Founders and Presidents of the need for vigilance regarding those who would use such methods to erode and destroy the Constitution's prohibitions on their power.
To: ColdOne
So is the tower.
10
posted on
09/21/2012 10:54:46 AM PDT
by
McGruff
(Support your local Republican candidates. They are our last line of defense.)
To: KittenClaws
A command that would cause DNS services to shut down would effectively shut the internet down. And you can bet the farm that the government has it ready to go; just need to tweek a few security settings I imagine.
11
posted on
09/21/2012 10:56:23 AM PDT
by
In Maryland
(Our rights come from nature and God, not government. - Paul Ryan)
To: jayrunner
Im at a loss to know why there isnt some agency, or other branch of government that is charged with supporting and upholding the U.S. Constitution. Czars, executive orders, are bypassing the checks and balances that are paramount in our Constitution. Have no fear! The Republicans in Congress will stand athwart this assault to our liberties!
12
posted on
09/21/2012 10:59:31 AM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(I'm not voting for Obama, so therefore I must be helping Romney!)
To: ColdOne
Here’s one certainly hoping her boss becomes impotent in its execution when he loses this election. UNIVISION can see his duplicity, why can’t the rest of his constituents?
13
posted on
09/21/2012 10:59:50 AM PDT
by
Gaffer
To: ColdOne
The day the government shuts down DNS services is the day the shooting begins. This fascist crap has got to stop somewhere.
14
posted on
09/21/2012 11:00:41 AM PDT
by
backwoods-engineer
(My game is disruption. I will use lethal force --my vote-- in self-defense against Obama.)
To: Nachum
15
posted on
09/21/2012 11:00:49 AM PDT
by
Army Air Corps
(Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
To: In Maryland
Following the current curve of events, FR won’t be here a year from now if 0bama is re-elected. I’m serious. At some point all communications will be downed. This is why everyone needs to buy a CB radio. Good idea for SHTF time.
To: In Maryland
A command that would cause DNS services to shut down would effectively shut the internet down. And you can bet the farm that the government has it ready to go; just need to tweek a few security settings I imagine.
_________________________
Imagine the logistics of such a thing, along with the monetary losses that would quickly ensue even if it could be done. I call BS.
If I'm wrong, I'm wrong. So let ‘im shut it down. We already know what's going on. Such a dictatorial action would invalidate his presidency.
17
posted on
09/21/2012 11:03:39 AM PDT
by
KittenClaws
(You may have to fight a battle more than once in order to win it." - Margaret Thatcher)
To: ColdOne
The Tyrant In Chief should be arrested for treason.
18
posted on
09/21/2012 11:04:05 AM PDT
by
Mich Patriot
(BLACK is the new "transparent")
To: ColdOne
19
posted on
09/21/2012 11:04:59 AM PDT
by
KC_Lion
( Wherever I find myself standing, I forever stand with Israel.)
To: In Maryland
I would be bad for banking and commerce wouldn't it. I don't think even OBOBO would want to mess up commerce and banking, would he?
20
posted on
09/21/2012 11:05:06 AM PDT
by
timestax
(Why not drug tests for the President AND all White Hut staff ? ? ?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-78 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson