Pray America!
Where, when?
Hope all his taxes are correct and up-to-date ... he is about to be audited.
“born in this country to parents who are both U.S. citizens, primarily to a U.S. citizen father.”
________________________________________
If this is designed to help Willard it wont...
Willard doesnt want birthers challenging Obamas fathe’s status...
Willard also had a father who was born elsewhere, Mexico, and who may not have been an American citixen when Willard was born...
Willard’s own father was challenged on his status when he ran for POTUS in 1964, 1968...
Willard does not want that all dragged up again...
Can somebody ping the Kansas list? We need people to contact this panel and urge them to do what is right.
I’m having troubles finding the return receipts for Kansas for some reason, but I remember seeing them come in because the states closest to Nebraska came in first. I’ll have the post office confirm with the tracking number tomorrow, but I am sure that two of the guys on that 3-person panel - the SOS and the AG - have received letters from Larry Klayman explaining that they themselves would have to commit election fraud to allow Obama on the ballot, since HI state registrar has legally confirmed that Obama has no legally-valid birth certificate in Hawaii; any Certification of Nomination they receive is thus immediately recognized as perjurious, and anyone who knows it is perjurious and still allows Obama on the ballot is him/herself complicit in election fraud.
With this challenge right there, they are placed in a LEGAL setting where they are held to account for what they know. We need Kansans to step up and tell these guys that we know they have been informed of this, and this cup will NOT pass from them. They are on the spot; will THEY commit election fraud for Obama?
The way that America goes down is if EVERY SOS and EVERY AG in the country is willing to commit election fraud for Obama. There is no way for these people to punt; they’ve been informed. Now what will they do?
We have to tell them we know and that we are watching to see what the rule of law means to them. And we will not forget what their answer is.
The Kansas Objections Board wanted to deny this challenge, but couldn’t find a legal reason to do so. They suggested that the objection was reading “too much” into Minor v. Happersett which they were told makes a clear material distinction between natural-born citizen and 14th amendment citizenship by birth. The objector pointed out that Obama’s cousnel cited only one Supreme Court case, Wong Kim Ark, but that their citation only applied to 14th amendment citizenship and the term “citizen of the United States,” not Article II eligibility. He also pointed out that Obama’s counsel ignored that the same decision said the 14th amendment does not say who shall be natural-born citizens, but that it cites Minor for the definition of all children born to parents who were its citizens.
The SOS is hinting still that he wants to sweep this under the rug and that he would use a nonlegally supported definition of NBC to do so. It’s very important to try to hold these people accountable and insist that they follow Supreme Court precedent, especially when Luria v. United States in 1913 points to Minor and not Wong Kim Ark to specifically define presidential eligibility.