Something needs to be done about the way the employees we hire to the judicial system learn they are our employees not our bosses and that they cannot continue to legislate from the bench. Gingrich pointed out in the primary race that something needs to be done. I have no answer myself.
To: rocksandbroncs
According to the US Constitution, a state may wage war to repel an invasion. Check.
According to this silly court, a state may not identify invaders in order to repel an invasion. Check.
2 posted on
08/20/2012 4:56:10 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(let me ABOs run loose, lew (or is that lou?))
To: rocksandbroncs
This is another case of the court overstepping its bounds under the Constitution to make a ruling that flies in the face of all law and is flat out rediculous. There is no reason to negate that section of the law which calls for checking the citizenship of any student. They can apply all the rhetoric they wish to to substantiate their ruling, but it is all hogwash. One of these days, people are going to rise up against one of these bad rulings and create a bad situation. Then and only then will the idiots start to be rational in their decisions.
To: rocksandbroncs
Our courts have largely overturned the basis of our political existence, representative government.
IIRC, Newt supported the disestablishment of whole lower courts and rejuvenation of the “with such exceptions and under such regulations” clause of Article III.
Every lower federal court exists at the pleasure of Congress. We could clear out a lot of rot by sending dozens of blackrobes home and starting over.
Oh, and no messy impeachments are necessary.
4 posted on
08/20/2012 4:58:22 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(Exterminate rats.)
To: rocksandbroncs
![](http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v253/chode6/chode2.gif)
from slave owners, to slaves... Alabama judges ain't what they used to be
5 posted on
08/20/2012 4:59:20 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: rocksandbroncs
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that the provision wrongly singles out children who are in the country illegally.
Do they really have no idea how farcical that sounds?
6 posted on
08/20/2012 5:04:46 PM PDT by
andyk
(Go Juan Pablo!)
To: rocksandbroncs
Here is Newt's response to judicial tyranny.
7 posted on
08/20/2012 5:05:38 PM PDT by
Jacquerie
(Exterminate rats.)
To: rocksandbroncs
The federal court made its stupid decision. Now, let them enforce it.
To: rocksandbroncs
provision wrongly singles out children who are in the country illegally.
.
.Wrongfully??????????????
The whole point of checking the status is to find illegals. What kind of specious reasoning calls it “wrong”.
11 posted on
08/20/2012 5:09:08 PM PDT by
Adder
(Da bro has GOT to go!)
To: rocksandbroncs
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that the provision wrongly singles out children who are in the country illegally. So could the court please point out the "rightly" way to single out "children who are in the country illegally", because, it's like, you know..... illegal!!!!
(this is real news, right? ABC, not Semi-News/Semi-Satire?)
12 posted on
08/20/2012 5:10:55 PM PDT by
jeffc
(The U.S. media are our enemy)
To: rocksandbroncs
It's not the job of a school to enforce immigration policy.
![](http://img803.imageshack.us/img803/5415/helmet1medic.jpg)
The Kenyan must go.
14 posted on
08/20/2012 5:56:22 PM PDT by
ex91B10
(We've tried the Soap Box,the Ballot Box and the Jury Box; ONE BOX LEFT!)
To: rocksandbroncs
“Alabama’s tough immigration law that ordered public schools to check the citizenship status of new students is unconstitutional.”
I’m sorry, but last I checked the public schools are for American children, and those who are here legally.
Taxpayers should not have to foot the bills for these human cockroaches.
Yet everytime on the local news they show some leach with some sob story, and a half dozen anchor babies saying that “they came here to *sniff sniff* have a better life”. They want a better life, they should keep their asses in their own country and fix their own mess, instead of coming here to bleed us dry and turning us into a third world rat hole like they came from. /rant
16 posted on
08/20/2012 7:05:21 PM PDT by
2CAVTrooper
( For those who have had to fight for it, freedom has a flavor the protected shall never know.)
To: rocksandbroncs
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Monday that the provision wrongly singles out children who are in the country illegally.
This is one of the stupidest statements I ever heard.
17 posted on
08/20/2012 7:09:02 PM PDT by
SECURE AMERICA
(Where can I sign up for the New American Revolution and the Crusades 2012?)
To: rocksandbroncs
The State should enforce it anyway, screw the Court.
18 posted on
08/20/2012 7:12:52 PM PDT by
MCF
To: rocksandbroncs
Either they are residents of the State of Alabama or a resident of another State. If they are residents of Alabama, then they should be offered out-of-state tuition rates.
Alabama (and all states) should make a rate for none US State residents, out-of-state citizens, along with in-state tuition rates. This would weed out the illegals or those here on US State Department Entry Visa's.
19 posted on
08/20/2012 7:19:25 PM PDT by
Jumper
To: rocksandbroncs
So..... Traffic stops are unconstitutional because they have undue impact on drunks?
CC
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson