[jazusamo]

“This partisan lawsuit wastes taxpayer dollars and resources, and is a distraction from the urgent business before Congress: acting to create jobs and grow our economy,” she said.

Pelosi's statement is not only hypocritical but laughable.

Hey Nan, unlike obamacare this is a matter we really do have to see before we know what's in it.

[Da Coyote]

Hah, and is anyone as Obamadumb as to think that Holder’s “MyPeople” department of felon/idiots is going to do anything about that lawsuit?

[Hotlanta Mike]

Hey Nan, how about allowing the courts to force Holder & Obama “to pass it...over” so that we can find out what’s in those subpoenaed docs?

[AuntB]

BTT

[LucianOfSamasota]

RE: House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat

Amazing how the commies hang together, isn’t it?

[B.O. Plenty]

Who is paying for Holder's lawyers?

Sorry, Pelosi is right. If Holder ain't paying personally, this means nothing except it will cost US!

Holder will respond only when it either means criminal actions against him or costs him a LOT of money.

If neither of these things happen, R's are, as they say, pissing in the wind.

[EGPWS]

But House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, rallied to the administration’s defense, saying the GOP push was misplaced.

Doesn't Pelosi want to force compliance so we can see what's in it?

[BlatherNaut]

She also repeated her claim that Republicans are using the fight against Mr. Holder in retaliation against his own push to halt GOP-led state laws designed to crack down on voter fraud.

Nancy and Eric firmly believe that freedom to commit voter fraud is every democrat's civil right.

[jazusamo]

Please bump the Freepathon or click above and donate or become a monthly donor!

[InterceptPoint]

I was afraid of this:

"While the Committee is entitled to all documents responsive to the Holder Subpoena that have not been produced, the Committee seeks in this action to enforce the Holder Subpoena only as to a limited subset of responsive documents, namely those documents relevant to the Department’s efforts to obstruct the Committee’s investigation."

This means Issa is more interested in the coverup than the "what did you know and when did you know it" phase of F&F. I don't understand that. This was almost certainly a WH/Holder hatched scheme and Issa seems be avoiding looking into that possibility like the plague.