Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Aerographite takes title of world's lightest material
Manufacturing Digital ^ | 13 Jul 2012 | Jonny Williamson

Posted on 07/14/2012 9:22:48 AM PDT by null and void

Collaboration between the Technical University of Hamburg and the University of Kiel in Germany has resulted in the world's lightest solid material being created, aerographite

It wasn’t so long ago that a metallic micro-lattice developed by HRL Laboratories, the California Institute of Technology and the University of California held the honour of being the world’s lightest material. Formed from a multitude of hollow tubes, each 1,000 times thinner than a human hair, researchers claimed the material could be utilised in battery electrodes or as way of dampening acoustics, shock and vibration.

The micro-lattice was not only strong, but incredibly light, almost 100 times lighter than Styrofoam, yet unbelievably aerographite is 100 percent lighter again, weighing less than 200 times that of Styrofoam.

Similar in construction, aerographite is made predominantly from a structure of hollow carbon tubes, grown at a nano and micro scale and is 99.9 percent air. Under an electron microscope the material resembles a wisp of smoke, but to the naked eye is more similar to a black sponge.

Discovered by the scientists when researching three-dimensionally cross-linked carbon structures, aerographite is grown using zinc oxide templates allowing the creation of shapes up to several cubic centimetres in size.

Though mostly air, the material can not only be compressed by a factor of 1,000 and still spring back to its original shape, but can also support many times its own weight. Amazingly the material is also electrically conducive and chemically-resistant; with researchers indicating that aerographite could be either used as electrical shielding, help create an ultra-lightweight battery or be used elsewhere in MEMS (micro-electromechancial systems).

The team’s research has been published in the online journal Advanced Materials.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: nanotech
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Easy? Nothing to it!
1 posted on 07/14/2012 9:22:52 AM PDT by null and void
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: null and void

I made an airplane out of aerographite, but it kept blowing away every time I breathed.


2 posted on 07/14/2012 9:32:47 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
The micro-lattice was not only strong, but incredibly light, almost 100 times lighter than Styrofoam, yet unbelievably aerographite is 100 percent lighter again, weighing less than 200 times that of Styrofoam.

Huh???

3 posted on 07/14/2012 9:43:53 AM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature not nurture TM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
...aerographite is 100 percent lighter again, weighing less than 200 times that of Styrofoam.

Though mostly air, the material can not only be compressed by a factor of 1,000 and still spring back to its original shape, but can also support many times its own weight.

So if by "many times its own weight" they mean 200 times it's own weight, you could make a darn good styrofoam coffee cup holder out of it.

4 posted on 07/14/2012 9:46:07 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

How would it do as material for wings in an ultra-light, or even an ornithopter (bird like propulsion)? Ballast weight of the pilot, his rig, and a supporting frame (if necessary) could offset that “fly away” factor.


5 posted on 07/14/2012 9:52:58 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Yes, the writer flunked 3rd grade math.


6 posted on 07/14/2012 9:54:47 AM PDT by katana (Just my opinions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

a material strong as steel but light as styrofoam would sell well, provided it is not too expensive.


7 posted on 07/14/2012 9:54:51 AM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (let establishment heads explode)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katana

One idea might be that instead of replacing the present “skin” of an ultra-light with aereographite, to use it for the “ribs” of the fuselage; and then provide sufficient mass in the “skin”; which, with aereographite’s greater ability to resist weight much greater than itself, the structural integrity of such a craft might have greater survivability in a crash - sacrificing some of the skin while holding more of the fuselage intact? Maybe?

On the other hand, your idea of using it for the skin of the craft, might be exchanged for even sturdier-than-present “ribs” of the craft, with no net addition of weight, and maybe, properly “joined”, the “skin” of aereographite composition might preserve aereographite’s shock absorption abilities, and thereby help improve an ultralight’s “survivability” in a crash.

Maybe one method or the other might be tried by different manufacturer’s.

Let’s watch and see - when an if this material moves from the lab to real-time applications.


8 posted on 07/14/2012 10:32:44 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: katana

“Yes, the writer flunked 3rd grade math.”

Yea it would sure help if they stopped using English majors to write technical stuff - it’s way beyond their capability.


9 posted on 07/14/2012 10:50:50 AM PDT by BobL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Looks like I’ll be trading in my Tempra-Pedic mattress soon. It would be like sleeping in zero gravity!


10 posted on 07/14/2012 12:07:28 PM PDT by Boiling point
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Apples (micro-lattice) and Oranges (Aerographite). Made perfect sense.


11 posted on 07/14/2012 12:16:45 PM PDT by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

If you use helium how light will it be?


12 posted on 07/14/2012 12:42:28 PM PDT by Starstruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Thanks for posting. Another interesting graphite product, graphene, was discovered in 2004 and has great, if not revolutionary potential, in a number of applications:

http://www.zdnet.com/the-10-strangest-facts-about-graphene-3040093050/


13 posted on 07/14/2012 12:54:11 PM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: katana
How would it do as material for wings in an ultra-light, or even an ornithopter (bird like propulsion)? Ballast weight of the pilot, his rig, and a supporting frame (if necessary) could offset that “fly away” factor.

There's probably a downside to the material, like being extremely brittle (a guess). They rarely mention the negatives in these press releases.

14 posted on 07/14/2012 1:03:26 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Get with the program. It looks an awful lot more like it does now that it did. sd


15 posted on 07/14/2012 1:13:37 PM PDT by shotdog (I love my country. It's our government I'm afraid of.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

100^2 is 10,000 times lighter. If it’s “only” 200 times, that’s twice as light as 100 times.


16 posted on 07/14/2012 1:25:00 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
The micro-lattice was not only strong, but incredibly light, almost 100 times lighter than Styrofoam, yet unbelievably aerographite is 100 percent lighter again, weighing less than 200 times that of Styrofoam.

Is the writer mixing things up? Saying "times" is used for multiples of a quantity, not a fraction of a quantity. If "100 times lighter" is supposed to mean 1/100th the weight, then something that is 1/100 of that isn't going to be "200 times lighter" because that would mean 1/200th the weight. The writer should have said 1/10,000 the weight of Styrofoam because a hundredth of a hundredth is a ten thousandth.
17 posted on 07/14/2012 1:48:43 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void
The micro-lattice was not only strong, but incredibly light, almost 100 times lighter than Styrofoam, yet unbelievably aerographite is 100 percent lighter again, weighing less than 200 times that of Styrofoam.

As written, it's even funnier. If you had a block of styrofoam that weighed a pound, then something that weighs "less than 200 times that of Styrofoam" could be anything between 1 and 200 pounds.
18 posted on 07/14/2012 1:50:33 PM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starstruck
If you use helium how light will it be?
’s what I was wondering - can it be made in a helium environment, and can it retain helium in its structure?

19 posted on 07/14/2012 2:00:06 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which “liberalism" coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Vests?
I wonder of this will be used to make great light weight protection.


20 posted on 07/14/2012 2:02:56 PM PDT by ElPaseo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson