Posted on 07/07/2012 9:26:47 AM PDT by Meet the New Boss
In my previously published article "Secrets Revealed," I concluded that what President Obama is concealing on his genuine long-form birth certificate (not the digital PDF forgery released to the public) is that his mother signed her maiden name.
snip
Personally, I think the preponderance of evidence shows that Obama's marriage to Ann Dunham was a legal contrivance that suited both their purposes -- Obama's as a means to maintain residency in the U.S. until he completed his studies, and Ann's (and maybe also her parents') to provide legitimacy to the baby's birth. In no way was this a meaningful marital relationship.
So were they really married? Yes, they went through the legal steps to become married. But because Obama the father was already married, the marriage wasn't legal -- and it certainly wasn't functional -- so they weren't really married in the way we understand marriage.
I know that my conclusion -- that Ann likely signed her maiden name to baby Barack's birth certificate because her marriage wasn't a real one, and that that's what's being hidden by the release of the "birth certificate" forgery -- is a huge disappointment to people who think that the president is hiding something much bigger -- like being born in Kenya. (Understandably, since releasing the digital PDF fake is a pretty big scam to cover up a pretty unimportant detail.)
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Along with that pattern is ALWAYS the threat to either take the child or kill the child.
Sven has indicated in his posts that 0 was made a ward of Catholic Services and his grandmother was appointed guardian. My dad worked with children in need of services for over forty years. He said to remove custody from the mother more had to be going on then just letting him travel without adult accompaniment.....Wonder if that is when he got the scar on his head. Is the scar mentioned in the book. It's a doosey! Thanks for your information...List of books to read is getting higher and higher.
We are expected to believe that the kenyan came to Hawaii around christmas 1971, zero was already at school in Hawaii as his teacher tells us; the kenyan gave a talk to the class while he was there. Maya, we are expected to believe was born in August 1970 according to the divorce document Dunham/Soetoro.
Did Maraniss have any idea what SAD was expected to do with her daughter? Leave her behind in Indonesia perhaps?
Maybe Maraniss might have benefitted from lurking on FR for a while before he wrote this nonsense...
With all the speculation why not throw in that Ann and Obama sr. were married in Kenya where multi wives are permitted. There are a lot of dots as to a Kenya connection. In all the speculation somethings appear to be surfacing, i.e. the mother was a slut and Obama was not born on USA territory among others.
Photographs and documents are ignored, direct questions are never answered, one can write an entire page outlining some of the perhaps known events, and it all falls on deaf ears...one turns to the next page, and there it is again...SAD was a communist at the age of seventeen, she was a girl totally without morals, she was attracted to black men forty or so years older than herself, she not only copulated with FMD, what about all those other men on the army base in Hawaii?
And all this for a girl who had NEVER BEEN SEEN in Hawaii! For whom there’s not a single sighting, not a single person has come forward and said they knew her, or attended classes with her or even shared an ice-cream with her or went to the beach with her...
And the only photograph of her on the beach in a bikini TURNS OUT TO BE A PHOTOGRAPH OF BARBARA BUSH WHEN SHE WAS A BEAUTIFUL YOUNG LADY!
I would laugh if it wasn’t so darn SAD.
Btw, when I first saw this image identified as SAD, I wrote to the website where it appeared and informed them WHO THE PHOTOGRAPH WAS AN IMAGE OF and although they did not apologize, they did at least have the grace to remove it. BUT THE STORY STILL LIVES. BARABARA BUSH IS STANLEY ANN DUNHAM!
Nah, Obama was an anchor baby for a man who wasn’t even his biological father. It was complicated by the fact that Obama, SR. was already married and the marriage wasn’t legal.
What about this evidence:
That image is ‘evidence’ only that at some time and in some place, a particular child was sitting on a fence while a woman who was probably Stanley Ann Dunham, held him.
It tells you nothing about where he came from, who his parents were, what his name was, when he was born or where he was born...
I doubt grandma Dunham knew that a girl of Stanley’s age was too young to confer American citizenship on her baby born in Canada, and anyway, they were not planning for Stanley ann to become a mother. She was to return home with no baby.
I am sure for YEARS baby Barack had no need of a BC. And then when it was time to travel to Indonesia, problems arose. They may have been desperate for Lolo to swear to Indonesia that this was his son, just to get him any travel docs at all. I bet if you are high up inindonesian society you can baksheesh your way to anything you want.
That’s my favorite theory...Stanley Armour knocked up some black prostitute and had to cover. It’s probably quite as simple as that not all this cloak and dagger stuff, but it makes for interesting reading. That’s why Madelyn didn’t want to be buried next to him.
If we only had DNA samples from George, Maya & Ø.
or adoption records- maybe sheriff joe will have some interesting news.. but i got a feeling its going to be something like that
Do you see the dark hued baby issuing from the birth canal?
Do you see the dark hued baby nursing from breast?
Do you see dark hued infant snuggled in her arms?
No?
Then all the photo proves is that she is holding a child who looks to be no younger than 3 years old.
And btw - that is the earliest photo of 0bastard with her. Odd that there is not one single baby/infant/toddler photo of him with her. That is the youngest he appears with SAD. He’s older than 2 I would bet on it.
My guess:
I think that they are going to find that the Dr. David Sinclair delivered Virginia S. and that the forgers used her birth certificate as the base for Obama’s. Changing information to match what Obama wants it to say.
Stanley Ann’s signature was cobbled together bits and pieces from other documents. So I speculate that she didn’t sign it as Ann Dunham or Stanley Ann Dunham Obama because she never signed it at all.
That would mean there is no Hawaii birth certificate only what Obama or someone submitted much, much, much later trying to get a late certificate.
there are said to be photos of Ann Dunham on Waikiki Beach taken in or about July 1961, when she is supposed to have been in her third simester. and not pregnant— BUT, i havent seen them.. just rumors back around 08 i think.. but if i had to bet on it, i would say its true—Wolf Blitzer probally has it locked up with his BC...lol
Jack Cashill points out that Susan Blake originally told Michael Patrick Leahy of the Seattle Times in 2008 that Dunham was going to Kenya (with the 3 week old) not Cambridge to be with her husband.
Dunham didn’t seem to have a problem coming up with money to get around. Probably funded by her parents.
http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/05/m-what_does_composite_girl_tell_us_about_obama.html
In April 2008, Botkin told the Seattle Times that Ann was excited about her husband’s plans to return not to Harvard, but to Kenya. Botkin said the same thing to writer Michael Patrick Leahy, who interviewed her early in the summer of 2008. Here, too, Botkin adds a clarifying detail: “[Dunham] left [Hawaii] just as soon she had clearance from her doctor to travel with her new baby.”
As Botkin acknowledged in several interviews, she never saw her friend again. The visit at Botkin’s mother’s house had to be in 1961, a year before Barack Sr. left for Harvard. Dunham arrived in Seattle in August 1961 and stayed for a year, enrolling at the University of Washington. Obama would not see Obama Sr. until he was ten.
http://cashill.com/intellect_fraud/how_washington_post.htm
Maraniss also appears to have overlooked an April 2008 article in the Seattle-Times, which reported, “Susan Blake [Botkin], another high-school classmate, said that during a brief visit in 1961, Dunham was excited about her husband’s plans to return to Kenya.” Note that the year was 1961, and the destination was Kenya.
Maraniss likewise missed a video interview with Botkin that had been posted online in which she specifically placed the date of Dunham’s visit as an “afternoon in 1961 when Barry was just a few weeks old.” She even claims to have “changed Barry’s diaper and showed [Dunham] how to do it.”
On August 23, 2008, a day before the Maraniss article appeared, author Michael Patrick Leahy interviewed Botkin by phone for his 2008 book, “What Does Barack Believe.”
Again, Botkin placed the visit in late summer 1961. “She left just as soon she had clearance from her doctor to travel with her new baby,” Botkin said of Dunham. “He was just 3 weeks old.”
Another high school friend, Maxine Box, confirmed for Leahy what Botkin was saying. The year Dunham showed up in Seattle was 1961. The baby was a newborn. And Dunham was on her way to see her husband, but Box was not sure where. Both Botkin and Box told Leahy they never saw Dunham again.
On this point, Botkin was very specific. Leahy reports that
Botkin sent Dunham an invitation to her own 1964 wedding to her last known address in Hawaii, but it was returned with no known forwarding address.
Instead of the hard data confirming Dunham’s presence in Seattle, Maraniss relied heavily on Susan Botkin and Maxine Box, but he either seriously misinterpreted their testimony or he massaged it to suit his own purposes.
As Maraniss acknowledged, Obama Sr. left Hawaii for the mainland and Harvard in June 1962, nearly a year after Barry’s birth in August 1961. This much is true. According to Maraniss, there was an “unresolved part of the story,” namely whether Dunham tried to follow Obama Sr. to Cambridge.
http://mobile.wnd.com/2012/03/will-wapo-author-un-tell-obamas-story/
“Something happened in Cambridge, and Stanley Ann returned to Seattle. [Her friends] saw her a few more times, and they thought she even tried to enroll in classes at the University of Washington, before she packed up and returned to Hawaii.”
Despite the fact that he was writing a lengthy biographical piece two months before the election, Maraniss made a hash of it. He has Ann following Obama Sr. to Harvard in the fall of 1961, but he did not enroll there until the fall of 1962.
By this time, too, Blake seems to have changed her story. She told Maraniss that Dunham was on her way to Cambridge, not Kenya, as she had told the Seattle Times months earlier.
Susan Blake’s story is a mess.
The only baby picture I’ve ever seen has little barry bastard commie looking like Frank Marshall Davis int he face. But is that picture also a photoshop? Disinformation is a strategy liars use ...
That stone box, BTW, has all the earmarks of a concrete product, albeit an as yet un-rediscovered concrete recipe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.