Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DOJ lawsuit: Physical test for police officers discriminates against women
Washington Examiner ^ | 7/3/12 | Joel Gehrke

Posted on 07/03/2012 4:08:35 PM PDT by Nachum

The Corpus Christi, Tex. Police Department has found itself on the business end of a civil rights lawsuit after the Justice Department concluded that a physical ability test used when considering job applications discriminates against women. As a condition for employment, new applicants must pass a physical ability test (PAT) involving: pullups, a 300-meter run, a 1.5 mile run, and sit-ups. Only 19 percent of female applicants passed this test between 2005 and 2009, compared to 63 percent of men, the DOJ complaint records. The Justice Department says that the test discriminates

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: doj; fitness; lawsuit; physical; physicalfitness; test
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Nachum

Requiring Lawyers to pass the Bar discriminates against idiots.................wait! Forget I posted this.


21 posted on 07/03/2012 4:34:53 PM PDT by Starstruck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Can the ladies pull a trigger and hit the target?


22 posted on 07/03/2012 4:36:49 PM PDT by pointsal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Raise your hand if you want a 5’1”, 90 lb. female coming to your rescue in a volatile situation. I didn’t think so.


23 posted on 07/03/2012 4:37:07 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

How much strength does it really take to shoot a dog?! (snork, snork!)


24 posted on 07/03/2012 4:37:20 PM PDT by momtothree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: EQAndyBuzz
Time to dig up an old time favorite.. A MUST SEE! LOL:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6aSJgcpqePk/a

26 posted on 07/03/2012 4:40:07 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
"one day one of these “affirmative action” candidates is going to get killed"

Scary, alarmist talk. Male criminals (who, of course, vote Democrat) will only go up against male police officers and female criminals will occupy the female officers. Case closed.

27 posted on 07/03/2012 4:40:17 PM PDT by I am Richard Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
As a condition for employment, new applicants must pass a physical ability test (PAT) involving: pullups, a 300-meter run, a 1.5 mile run, and sit-ups. Only 19 percent of female applicants passed this test between 2005 and 2009, compared to 63 percent of men...

Any questions?.....The word discriminate has been raped by the left.

Look, if you can't do what the job requires, you don't get the job...in any government or private sector.

Is this sooo hard to understand?

Let's qualify 105lb women to be firefighters, cops and Marines....what do you say???

FMCDH(BITS)

28 posted on 07/03/2012 4:40:26 PM PDT by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This is good video of why women should not be in combat and are not capable of combat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fy—whDNNKk


29 posted on 07/03/2012 4:42:25 PM PDT by pterional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
I might agree if they were required to pass a physical ability test more than one time.
There are so many older, fat, and out of shape cops. I doubt some of them could even run a block. I am sure most woman that are in shape could outperform them.
I don't see them as being anymore of a hindrance than some out of shape man.

However, physical strength may be a different story.

30 posted on 07/03/2012 4:46:47 PM PDT by kara37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz; scbison

” And in the process she is going to get her partner killed also.”

You have to learn to think like a liberal to understand that this is the part that makes it fair. Obama probably would give it a fancy name like “Critical Gender Theory”


31 posted on 07/03/2012 4:46:47 PM PDT by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Women should be able to get by with a 10 minute stroll of 200 yards.

Unless purses or shoes are on a sale on the way, then they'll never make the end line...

I'm gonna get it, ain't I?

32 posted on 07/03/2012 4:47:32 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Guns Walked -- People Died -- Holder Lied -- Obama Golfed (thanks, Secret Agent Man))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Here is another video of why a weak female police officer is of little help and is actually detrimental in a physical conflict.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3JiilljhOQ&feature=related


33 posted on 07/03/2012 4:50:43 PM PDT by pterional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Oh for goodness sakes!!! Enough of this bleep already! If a girl can’t do a mans job, then she can’t do it, period, end of story.

He made men and women different. Those differences compliment each other. I sure as heck would NOT want some 115lb 5’3 woman fire fighter coming to “rescue” me from a burning building.

There are standardized tests for a reason. If you can’t pass it, then you FAIL and cannot move on. This goes for men as well.

Deal with it. I sure as heck could not, nor would not want to do such a thing. As a girl, if I really wanted to, I’d go for it.

If I failed (which I know I would), so be it. There are SO many other opportunities out there.

Why on earth do girls want to be guys anyway?


34 posted on 07/03/2012 4:51:20 PM PDT by NoGrayZone (For evil to triumph it is only necessary for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

When they started to recruit women into the Charleston, WV police force, the add read “Amazon and butch women encouraged to apply”.


35 posted on 07/03/2012 4:52:07 PM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

When they started to recruit women into the Charleston, WV police force, the ad read “Amazon and butch women encouraged to apply”.


36 posted on 07/03/2012 4:52:20 PM PDT by LetsRok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Also discriminates against paraplegics and quadriplegics.


37 posted on 07/03/2012 4:55:48 PM PDT by NoLibZone (We must get down on our knees each day and thank God that McCain/Palin didn't win in '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
pretty much...
38 posted on 07/03/2012 4:57:30 PM PDT by Chode (American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This does not sound like a difficult physical fitness test for someone epected to defend their own lives and those of others. I’m surprised so many men failed it. Do they not know what this test constists of before they take it? Most likely they had plenty of time to get in shape.

Sounds to me like perhaps those taking it are simply a bit too lazy to do what it takes to get into peak physical condition. It does take a some work if you are not used to it.


39 posted on 07/03/2012 4:59:34 PM PDT by formosa (Formosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pointsal
Can the ladies pull a trigger and hit the target?

Oh sure...When it's time to carry the 250 pound bloated woman out of the house fire, or hostage situation, the lady cops can just shoot the cow.

Where's the beef?

40 posted on 07/03/2012 5:06:38 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson