Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

“I think Roberts changed his vote”

I can’t buy anything coming from Salon....

But I wouldn’t be surprised - I can also believe in the black helicopter stuff as well.

But I still have to think the world is generally sane and Roberts did what he did because he thought it out.

If I read the tea leaves, this was indeed his “gift” to the GOP, but he’ll never say so. I just hope we don’t screw it up.

One thing I’ve noticed already is that the extreme right wingers who would never vote for Romney have been quiet...


125 posted on 06/29/2012 12:38:32 PM PDT by mike_9958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: mike_9958

It doesn’t matter where the analysis is posted. Read it across the net. And then read the decision for yourself.

There is no doubt in my mind that Roberts switch his vote.

I can assure you that the 4 in the dissent were not happy with this outcome. It’s a betrayal to them because everything had already been sorted out.

What is yet to be discovered is if they left clues on purpose because there were pissed or if they just didn’t have time to fully rewrite and edit the opinions .

200 years from now people are going to be wondering about this

“Finally, we must observe that rewriting §5000A as a tax in order to sustain its constitutionality would force us to confront a difficult constitutional question: whether this is a direct tax that must be apportioned among the States according to their population. Art. I, §9, cl. 4. Perhaps it is not (we have no need to address the point); but the meaning of the Direct Tax Clause is famously unclear, and its application here is a question of first impression that deserves more thoughtful consideration.”

Well,it must not be a tax since Scotus didn’t discuss whether this had to be apportioned among states. RIGHT?????

No, ...

“The dissenters are saying that construing the mandate as a tax would require them to address a constitutional question that they don’t have to address. But the only reason the Court would not have to address this question is if the majority in fact refused to construe the mandate as a tax – which is exactly what the Court’s majority ended up doing.”

The opinions are a very poorly worded because Roberts changed the vote.


128 posted on 06/29/2012 4:41:33 PM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson