Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/27/2012 11:48:12 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: SeekAndFind

Liberalism, controlled by mocking and shame if you stray from its tight borders, is seen as normal by a whole generation of people. Why? Because they control the mass media.

I myself grew up thinking liberal = normal until I got some sense. I thought the NEWS was the truth.

Here, Scalia is defending freedom within sovereign borders and this WaPo idiot is defending — the liberals’ desire to trick more people into keeping them in power. Nothing more. That is what “immigration reform” is. They finally got through generations of family values to fool Latinos.


26 posted on 06/27/2012 12:04:06 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Is there nothing these people won’t do to protect their corrupt president?


27 posted on 06/27/2012 12:05:23 PM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

“Not content with issuing a fiery written dissent, Scalia offered a bench statement questioning President Obama’s decision to allow some immigrants who were brought to the United States illegally as children to stay. Obama’s move had nothing to do with the case in question. Scalia just wanted you to know where he stood.”

Why shouldn’t he question Obama’s refusal to enforce immigration law particular on this case. Is it not the very essence of the case that if Arizona could fully enforce Federal immigration law that Obama’s refusal to enforce federal immigration law would become irrelevant?

I can’t think of anything more appropriate to bring up, as Obama’s actions are indeed at the very heart of the dispute for both sides.


28 posted on 06/27/2012 12:05:23 PM PDT by Monorprise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

EJ Dionne and the rest of the messedupnbc “corpse” must give themselves a swirly in a post-chili-dog exodus toilet.


30 posted on 06/27/2012 12:06:08 PM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (I prefer liberty with danger to peace with slavery, IXNAY THE TSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I wonder what Dionne’s response would be if Scalia called on him to resign?


31 posted on 06/27/2012 12:07:15 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Behind enemy lines in the city where it's illegal to buy a Big Gulp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Dionne ought get back on his meds.


35 posted on 06/27/2012 12:09:06 PM PDT by BigEdLB (Now there ARE 1,000,000 regrets - but it may be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is the best reason for Scalia eing on the court, Just to PO Dionne.


37 posted on 06/27/2012 12:09:16 PM PDT by golfisnr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

This is the best reason for Scalia eing on the court, Just to PO Dionne.


38 posted on 06/27/2012 12:09:23 PM PDT by golfisnr1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Yeah, one can never tell how Kagan, Breyer, Ginsburg or The Wise Latina will ever vote on any issue, huh EJ?

These affirmative action Jacksons don’t have an original thought, are poor excuses for the highest court in the land and are the worst appointments ever. What a disgrace they always vote in a bloc, never thinking for themselves. Same ol same ol with these losers.


39 posted on 06/27/2012 12:09:54 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Free the Zimmermans. . . end this political, racist travesty of a "prosecution")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I guess even Justice Scalia doesn’t have freedom of speech, eh, E.J.?


41 posted on 06/27/2012 12:11:10 PM PDT by Crucial (Tolerance at the expense of equal treatment is the path to tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
So often, Scalia has chosen to ignore the obligation of a Supreme Court justice to be, and appear to be, impartial.

Where in hell did he get a crazy idea like that?............

43 posted on 06/27/2012 12:12:17 PM PDT by Red Badger (Think logically. Act normally.................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
EJ Dionne would be more suited for a janitorial position. In time, he might aspire to be an SEIU union steward. Intelligent writing is well beyond his capability.
45 posted on 06/27/2012 12:12:59 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Hey EJ Dionne..... Photobucket
46 posted on 06/27/2012 12:13:21 PM PDT by baddog 219
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

LMFAO! Boy, that’s a real knee slapper, E.J., you should be a ****ing comedian.


47 posted on 06/27/2012 12:13:39 PM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

So Scalia commenting on how things are, or are not, Constitutional is considered being a politician? He was chosen for the Supremes because he’s a smart man, who actually THINKS about the Constitutionality of laws. I can’t see why on earth that would be a problem, but then, I don’t look at life through a radical liberal lens.


48 posted on 06/27/2012 12:14:35 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

The left, as represented in this case by EJ Dionne, want to preempt the inevitable decision by SCOTUS to overturn all or part of 0bamacare by personalizing its attacks on the Justices and their principled interpretations of the law. Whatever Justice Scalia says is far more interesting and correct in its interpretation of the Constitution than any noise from EJ Dionne. What a loser.


49 posted on 06/27/2012 12:17:07 PM PDT by kevinm13 (Tim Geithner is a tax cheat. Manmade "Global Warming" is a HOAX!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

Although I agree with what Scalia said, I “concur” with Dionne partially. I worry that Scalia’s mouthing off about current events may result in his having to recuse himself in a forthcoming case about immigration.


51 posted on 06/27/2012 12:17:53 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

I am so angry at this write up in the Washington Post. I tried to put my comment in, but their system is having problems and won’t let me post.

Grrr... I want to post!

Since I can’t - here it is!

I think you have a problem! The President took an oath of office that was to protect and defend its citizens. He has become a President that decides which laws he will and will not obey. If you have a President that can just say we will ignore illegal entry into our country and then also give them preferential treatment, then you are breaking the law. If you agree with him, then you are an idiot!

Immigrants (legal) should be given preferential treatment. Illegal - no matter how they got here, should not be brought to the front of the line. Especially when you are talking about 800,000 to 1.3 million people. This is not fair to those legal immigrants that have waited to become citizens. Once these legal immigrants become citizens, then they have the right to bring their family here as well to begin the process of citizenship.

Our President has decided to break the law and grant people who illegally cross more rights than it’s own citizens which should be condemned. I agree with Justice Scalia in his anger towards this corrupt government! E.J. Dionne Jr. you should be ashamed at yourself for going after a man who has the integrity to state it how it is.


53 posted on 06/27/2012 12:18:18 PM PDT by jcsjcm (This country was built on exceptionalism and individualism. In God we Trust - Laus Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind

EJ Dionne needs to go play in rush hour traffic.


55 posted on 06/27/2012 12:20:37 PM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama’s move had nothing to do with the case in question. Scalia just wanted you to know where he stood.

Neither did the grounds Kagan and company used in their ruling. They are on common ground there.

61 posted on 06/27/2012 12:24:48 PM PDT by Ingtar ("As the light begins to fade in the city on the hill")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson