MALKIN UNLOADS on Liberal Over Fast and Furious: ‘THE BLOOD IS ON YOUR PEOPLE’s HANDS!’

TheBlaze.com ^ | June 21, 2012 | Jonathon M. Seidl

[Yosemitest]

MALKIN UNLOADS ON LIBERAL ‘HANNITY’ GUEST OVER FAST AND FURIOUS:
‘THE BLOOD IS ON YOUR PEOPLE'S HANDS!’

June 21, 2012 by Jonathon M. Seidl


Last week, Michelle Malkin stoked the conservative fire after she challenged Juan Williams for calling her “just” a blogger.
But if that was stoking the fire, what she did Wednesday night on “Hannity” to liberal Tamara Holder was torching the place with napalm.

Malkin was a guest along with Holder on a segment talking about the day’s Fast and Furious news
(Obama granting executive privilege and Holder being held in contempt).
About three minutes in, Holder tried to use the liberal talking point
that the entire operation was really started under the Bush administration
(the “blame Bush” mantra is really popular these days).
That’s where things first got tense, after Holder scolded Hannity who tried to make a point and told him,
“No no, let me finish.
Give me the same amount of time you give all your Republican friends.”



But after Holder continued to try and use the argument, Malkin eventually had enough.

“Can I just go back to this, the tiresome blame Bush card,
because I don‘t think that Tamara knows what she’s talking about
when we talk about the difference between Fast and Furious and Operation Wide Receiver and Project Gunrunner,” Malkin said.

“Excuse me!” Malkin shouted back when Holder tried to interrupt.
“This is not a partisan thing!”

Holder, clearly offended, took a shot at Malkin:
“Sure, sure, I don’t know what I am talking about.
No no, to be attacked and say that I don‘t know what I am talking about
just because I’m not a New York Times best-selling author–.”


Hannity stepped in and let Malkin finish, who delivered another blow:
“For some of us the core issues of national security, Second Amendment rights, integrity in government actually matters,
it is not just some sort of TV game debate for us, Tamara.”

Holder did not appreciate that,
and there were plenty more raised voices before Malkin pointed out
that Wide Receiver was “planned, controlled delivery and retrieval“
and that ”they got those guns back,”
but that didn’t happen in the Obama administration
because there was “underlying gun control agenda that is clear in these documents.”

“Clearly they are the ones with the ideological zealotry that caused bloodshed in this country.
The blood is on your people’s hands, Tamara!” she said passionately.

“No, actually we‘re all Americans and it’s on all of our hands,” Holder responded,
before saying these things just “take time” to figure out and that the contempt charge is too soon.

Malkin interrupted, and when Holder objected Malkin shot back,
“No, I’m not going to let you get away with that lie!”

Watch the segment below.
The setup starts at about 3:30, but the fireworks show begins about two minutes later:

[ThisLittleLightofMine]

Jeopardy has been shilling for Obama for the last year, we watch it every night and without fail something Obama comes into every episode. They think people don't notice or they just don't care.

[Mountain Mary]

Yeah, every word that Michelle says is worth it’s price in gold...especially compared to Hannity’s broken record.

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

That's really not fair. You're bringing facts and truth into an emotionally based argument.

Besides, it's all about “the chillun’.” That reminds me, who knew Nancy Pelosi was on a conservative website?

[lentulusgracchus]

Weeper of the House Boehner should have half the spine Michelle Malkin has.

Hey, that gives me an idea .....

Bye-bye BooHoo.

[liberty or death]

I stopped watching O’Wiley when he gave the Socialist thug Obama a pass in his interviews. “Lookin out for the Folks”? Ha!

[lentulusgracchus]

Hannity pisses me off. He cannot help himself; he just has to interrupt every person he has on his show.

I've noticed the same thing about Charlie Rose. Many's the time I've found myself shouting at the television, "SHUT UP, CHARLIE, DAMMIT!!" (or even worse, when he gets really annoying and tries to bullsteer his guest's responses in the direction Rose wants to take him).

[lentulusgracchus]

Based on clear evidence uncovered after the war which proved many “Japanese-Americans” living on the west coast were saboteurs, she said the internment camps were prudent and right.

Really?! I never heard that!

Now, why would liberals refuse to let that cat out of the bag in dozens of stories since 1945 about internment?

Thanks for that bit of revisionist info .... so they lied to me again, eh? This is getting .... tedious.

[Rides_A_Red_Horse]

To be fair, not all of the Japanese were sabateurs. Then again, not all of them were innocent either.

Unfortunately, opportunists took advantage of the situation to purchase their property far below fair market value. In many cases, they were forced to abandon it.

If done right, war is violent, ugly, brutal and brief. This is something we’ve forgotten in our quest to be “kind.”

War should never stretch out over a decade. Once the U.S. joined WWII it was over within a few years.