Skip to comments.
MALKIN UNLOADS on Liberal Over Fast and Furious: ‘THE BLOOD IS ON YOUR PEOPLE’s HANDS!’
TheBlaze.com ^
| June 21, 2012
| Jonathon M. Seidl
Posted on 06/21/2012 6:36:08 AM PDT by Yosemitest
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
To: rxtn41
Do you mean, perhaps, "he background"?
Hmmmm ~ ever hear what she had to say about tossing American chillun' in prison during WWII?
41
posted on
06/21/2012 7:50:54 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: rxtn41
Do you mean, perhaps, "he background"?
Hmmmm ~ ever hear what she had to say about tossing American chillun' in prison during WWII?
42
posted on
06/21/2012 7:51:13 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: CatherineofAragon
During the Juan Williams take down - I saw a poster somewhere say that Michelle went all “cut-eye” on him.
She did the same thing with this woman.
To: pistolpackinpapa
Hannity is trying to keep the conversation on track and not going back to the liberal talking points. We heard this shi! a million times from liberals.
To: MrB
The GOP would be in far better shape if King Solomon were their ‘Architect’ rather than Karl Rove.
45
posted on
06/21/2012 7:53:04 AM PDT
by
skeeter
To: trisham
Didn't I say they had "visas"? That's how you know they were here legally. But were they citizens?
The answer is NO!
Was she born before they had immigration visas? The same answer.
I'm all for the technicalities.
46
posted on
06/21/2012 7:54:05 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: All
Let us ALL remember,
Over a barrel? Meet White House gun policy adviser Steve Croley
By Jason Horowitz,
(excerpt) ... On March 30, the 30th anniversary of the assassination attempt on President Ronald Reagan, Jim Brady, who sustained a debilitating head wound in the attack,
and his wife, Sarah, came to Capitol Hill to push for a ban on the controversial large magazines.
Brady, for whom the law requiring background checks on handgun purchasers is named, then met with White House press secretary Jay Carney.
During the meeting, President Obama dropped in and, according to Sarah Brady, brought up the issue of gun control, to fill us in that it was very much on his agenda, she said.
I just want you to know that we are working on it, Brady recalled the president telling them.
We have to go through a few processes, but under the radar.
In the meeting, she said, Obama discussed how records get into the system and what can be done about firearms retailers.
Her husband specifically brought up the proposed ban on large magazine clips,
and she noted that even former vice president Dick Cheney had suggested that some restrictions on the clips might make sense.
He just laughed, Sarah Brady said approvingly of the president.
Both she and her husband, she emphasized, had absolute confidence that the president was committed to regulation.
In simpler, pre-administration times, so was the presidents point man.
In Croleys book, he argued that for all the healthy skepticism, in a complex world, regulation still amounted to the least-worst solution to pressing social problems.
47
posted on
06/21/2012 7:55:10 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die!)
To: Joe Brower
"I cannot spare this woman... she fights."
Isn't this borrowed from what Lincoln said about Grant?
To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
Under Socialism/Communism the individual owns nothing, not even their self.And, Sir, that if just where we are heading. What do we own now that is not under the control of Government. You are right on and needs to be said over and over. We are no longer free, but wards of the State. You can bet on that.
To: muawiyah; rxtn41
Hmmmm ~ ever hear what she had to say about tossing American chillun’ in prison during WWII?
Based on clear evidence uncovered after the war which proved many “Japanese-Americans” living on the west coast were saboteurs, she said the internment camps were prudent and right.
Now I bet you're gonna wax poetically and emotionally about them poor “chillun’” languishing in chains.
To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
This is why, immediately after a communist takeover, they teach evolution and get rid of all religion. When your existance is merely an accident of time and chance, and you’re not valuable accountable to a higher being, the state becomes of primary universal importance.
51
posted on
06/21/2012 8:03:41 AM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: pistolpackinpapa
I turned-off that liberal-RINO blowhard Hannity years ago; he’s dogcrap and 10x worse than nails on a blackboard.
52
posted on
06/21/2012 8:06:31 AM PDT
by
Carriage Hill
(All libs & most dems think that life is just a sponge bath, with a happy ending.)
To: workerbee
That’s the typical ploy by an ignoramous liberal rat to combine both sides as one in the argument when it clearly falls heavily on their side. Truly scumbags, they are!
53
posted on
06/21/2012 8:13:53 AM PDT
by
SgtHooper
(The last thing I want to do is hurt you. But it's still on the list.)
To: CaribCarter
” - - - Unfortunately, Im sure Mitt and his GOP insiders wont either.”
McCain chose Palin, (his best Campaign decision), and the Tampa Convention should draft Malkin to be Romney’s Veep.
Romney has more faults than I have time to list. However, near the top of the list is Romney’s absolute total lack of “FIRE IN THE BELLY!”
Malkin has more than enough for both of them.
BTW, the “GOP insiders” are on a track, in 2012, to repeat the same mistakes McCain made in his loss to Obama in 2008.
54
posted on
06/21/2012 8:19:54 AM PDT
by
Graewoulf
((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
To: RummyChick
Thanks for reminding me about the Juan Williams thing. I didn’t see it when it happened; going to dig up the video.
And yes, she did have a cut-eye going on last night....at the end, she even did a soul-sister “snap” gesture, LOL.
55
posted on
06/21/2012 8:23:06 AM PDT
by
CatherineofAragon
(Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
To: Rides_A_Red_Horse
First off you'll need to come up with the evidence ~ since no one else has. But secondly I didn't say anything about Japanese, just children.
Michelle was happy to imprison infants even.
She's all about the technicalities that serve to punish the innocent ~ which is why I don't cut her any slack on any of this stuff.
56
posted on
06/21/2012 8:26:39 AM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: pistolpackinpapa
57
posted on
06/21/2012 8:27:06 AM PDT
by
clbiel
(Islamophobia: The irrational fear of being decapitated)
To: Yosemitest
Tamara Holder is such a shill for liberals she has become nothing more than a joke!!!
58
posted on
06/21/2012 8:27:32 AM PDT
by
ontap
To: Mouton
The one that made me puke was when she tried to suck up to the military/
To: ontap
Why is Tamara Holder's last name the same as Eric Holder?
60
posted on
06/21/2012 8:32:51 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's simple, fight or die!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-88 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson